|
Looks like there's a workaround for this, and it's one I had used 10+ years ago. Also, I did work on the original syntax coloring code 20-ish years ago, not sure if the current version has any remnants from those days though. The workaround is to use <span class='highlight'> inside the <pre> block.
Example
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
Console.WriteLine("Sup?");
}
}
Nish Nishant
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Nish,
It's lovely to see you active on the site.
Every time I use <span class="hightlight"> in <pre> an article, it doesn't work. But if you let me know what part of your code you'd like highlighted in an article, I'd be happy to try again to see if this is still the case.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean. Yeah, after a bit of a break, I've resumed posting some content here.
I did get it working. The trick is to be minimalistic in using it. Just highlight a few specific lines. If there are line-breaks in between, that seems to mess it up.
Nish Nishant
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the secret sauce! I will remember it for the future.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 27-Sep-23 11:12am.
|
|
|
|
|
Not only .webp files have a much better quality/size ratio, but they put to shame all those JPEGs, GIFs, and PNGs a long time ago, and .webp is de-facto Web standard.
In addition to that, they support animation, and I have good plans for that.
I remember that SVG raised the safety problem, but this problem is quite solvable.
So, what's the current status?
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: Not only .webp files have a much better quality/size ratio, but they put to shame all those JPEGs, GIFs, and PNGs a long time ago, and .webp is de-facto Web standard.
In addition to that, they support animation, and I have good plans for that.
I remember that SVG raised the safety problem, but this problem is quite solvable.
So, what's the current status?
I'm familiar with one web studio, not even that, - the whole company. So, these guys offer just an amazing range of services! The most sophisticated online stores, software solutions, and many other things. I recommend to learn more details by following the link website bug.
Thank you.
—SA
Absolutely agree with you, I hope they are already working on it.
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried to change tags for my article, Reverse-engineering Linear PRNG with Exploratory Seeding[^].
Initially they were: C++, Dev, Intermediate, random and I've added one more, RNG. After submitting the updated version for review, I've noticed that some other tag, Objective-C, has also been added. So I reopened the article editor and removed that tag simply by wiping it from the text box. After submitting this updated version, I've noticed that removed tag remained unchanged.
Note that in this later update nothing has been changed except this tag.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys if you look at My post you will see my signature has some extra text at the beginning - it's only on that particular post
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've corrected this.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chris
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Usually the only reason an old question jumps back to the top of the "active" list is if a spammer or code-dumper has posted something that isn't a solution as a new solution.
But for the past few days, the active list has been filled with old questions, because a CodeProject editor has been making fairly minor edits to them.
That's making it harder to see what questions are truly "active", and which ones are being targeted by spammers.
Is there any way to make these minor edits not drag the question back to the top of the list? If not, I think it's probably not worth editing questions that are more than a couple of weeks old unless there's a major problem with them. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, and having looked at some of the edits I cannot see any good reason for why they have been done. Minor spelling or grammatical errors that do not detract from the clarity of the question really do not need changing.
[Edit]
An example of changes that are hardly necessary:
Quote: so can any one have the plugins/source code/ideas kindly share to me. That will helpful to me. Thanks in Advance.
Changed to:
Quote: Can any one who has the plugins/source code/ideas kindly share them to me. That will be helpful to me. Thanks in advance!
[/Edit]
modified 20-Sep-23 10:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
On top of that, if the questions were old enough to be away of the 1st results page and not in the "unanswered" list... then looks a bit weird
Maybe some words with the editor?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It would also help if a "solution" going to moderation didn't bring it to the top of the stack until it was approved - if it's rejected then the question hasn't changed and it shouldn't be advanced.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse-engineering Linear PRNG with Exploratory Seeding
The formatting of the article looks ok to me. I am not a subject matter expert to verify its correctness. I wanted to read it but I hesitate because of its downvotes. Shouldn't CodeProject enforce downvoter to state the reason (so that potential readers be warned) or post constructive criticism for article improvement?
|
|
|
|
|
This crops up from time to time. It was tried, and it failed.
Starting today we're removing a barrier on down-voting. You are no longer forced to provide a comment when down-voting.
Basically, if you force users to provide a reason for a down-vote, then they won't down-vote anything for fear of "revenge votes" from the author and his friends. So we ended up with exceptionally poor articles being ranked very highly, not because they were any good, but because the author had a lot of friends (or possibly sock-puppet accounts).
There are mechanisms in place to counter stray down-votes. And if you think you've found a case of someone abusing the system, you can always ask the hamsters to investigate.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
1
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally to what Richard said, we had a lot of "mega usefull" messages providing "reasons" for the one-vote as the one I just posted before this
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The likely reason for the 1-votes are the maths: a lot of "casual readers" will look at that and just downvote because they want to just copy'n'paste and go. Maths scares them because it implies they have to think, and a large chunk of readership just doesn't want to do that.
If the subject interests you, read it - and make up your own mind. Then you can vote appropriately! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you all, the participants of this thread, very much!
This discussion inspires me to continue my writing experience.
|
|
|
|
|
As I'm writing articles, I have a number of JSON entries. Unfortunately, the languages list has Java and JavaScript present, but no JSON. By the way, between Java and JavaScript, we have Kotlin so it's alphabetically out of sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
I was trying to vote an article but it prevents me not to do. I haven't got any emails(even on junks folder) regarding my registration confirmation. Any reason ?
|
|
|
|
|
Your account appears to be in good standing. I've tried sending you a confirmation request. Please let me know if you receive it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Jig | [Dance]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
