|
There's your problem. You didn't delete your Google account. Youtube is owned by Google (Alphabet).
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Will the cookies survive if I completely delete the browser history?
Yes - cookies have nothing to do with history, AFAIK.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks... Q: How I can delete these sweets`?
|
|
|
|
|
Somewhere in browser settings 
On more serious note install plugin that deletes cookies automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
Or switch to Edge and configure it for Strict security. No third party cookie will be accepted and they'll simply not be downloaded to your machine.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you heard of browser fingerprinting?
Cover Your Tracks[^]
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting. Thank you very much for this!
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Have you heard of browser fingerprinting?
YT may or may not use fingerprinting for Google's nefarious purposes, but YT defiantly won't serve you curated content based on it. It's enough to clean your cookies, to avoid curation.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link.
My settings seem to be doing the trick.
>64
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
It's because they care about you. You're their valued user and friend. They want to help you. You are not a number, 0x01AA, you are... oh, wait...
Well, that's screwed that theory up.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: any idea?
You are in a matrix and cannot delete anything. It knows everything.
Or, stop watching such creepy videos. Otherwise why would you care? 
|
|
|
|
|
So what does that make of YouTube, who is hosting said "creepy videos"?
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: So what does that make of YouTube, who is hosting said "creepy videos"?
They don't know what's actually being uploaded. They are just a host.
Just kidding, google knows and sees everything.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 15329613 wrote: Just kidding, google knows and sees everything.
They're taking down stuff all the time; most of it is automated. So yeah, they don't exactly turn a blind eye...
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: most of it is automated.
Or conservative. 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am interested in getting a signature pad to be able to get my daily job accepted by signature at the end of the day when I am out of the office working for customers.
I could use a paper based system like usual, but I have a small PHP application I made to keep track of my job and it is capable to print PDFs with all the information automatically, so those pads seem the way to go.
I'm in doubt between those 2 brands and device types.
Have any of you used them?
Any important detail to be aware of before buying?
Wacom STU-430 Signature Pad Overview | Wacom for Business[^]
Product Page signotec Zeta | signotec GmbH[^]
Thank you all!
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: I haven't used Signotec, but I have never had any problems with Wacom products. Their products are typically more pricey, but they have always had good build quality.
|
|
|
|
|
How good is python for website development? What are your thoughts?
ed
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: How good is python for website development?
Well, first off, Python is not something you use for website development. But if you're talking about Python hosting a website...
Python is interpreted. Therefore slow. Very slow. I would not want to do DB work in Python, even if the low-level implementation is in complied C, the business logic would be in Python, and that would be dog slow for certain things.
That said, if all you're doing is implementing something simple, for example a website hosted on an SBC, then go for it.
If you want to use Python for anything complicated, then I'd suggest using Django as the web framework. That said, when I tried using Django a few years ago, some things were a bit of a WTF experience. Maybe things have improved.
Personally, I would never use Python for hosting anything but the most simplest of websites. Like displaying a clock. Oh wait, than can be done entirely in front-end JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot to mention I am doing a small ecommerce website, with a limited number of users.
Albert Spangler
|
|
|
|
|
Slow Eddie wrote: I forgot to mention I am doing a small ecommerce website, with a limited number of users.
Oh, then sure, go for Python. There are some decent eCommerce modules out there and some lightweight ORM stuff - theoretically, it should almost be plug & play.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc,
I wholeheartedly agree with you. I recently worked for a mid-sized company that decided to use Python/Django as their core framework for all of their web solutions. We had to transition from using .NET Core/Dagger/VueJS to this monstrosity. Hugely confusing and the framework design/architecture seemingly "thrown together" and SLOW. Why would anyone go this route. Did I mention SLOW? Needless to say, we didn't see eye to eye and I left to go do bigger and better things (in .NET Core and VueJS, of course ).
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Oh wow, they dropped .NET Core for Python / Django? Why in the world would they do that? Let me guess - some manager's kid wanted a job and all they knew was Python?
|
|
|
|
|
First off, ignore people telling you that you can't build something big or good with Python and Django: 10 Popular Websites Built With Django
Secondly, check out Obey The Testing Goat to learn how - either buy the book or use the free online version.
Happy hunting.
------------------------------------------------
If you say that getting the money
is the most important thing
You will spend your life
completely wasting your time
You will be doing things
you don't like doing
In order to go on living
That is, to go on doing things
you don't like doing
Which is stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting, most on the list are quite braindead sites - not sure related to Django, but the cuts hurt me.
MI things, like music offerings on Spotify are quite good, on the other hand. YouTube algorithm is world-renowned for offers, too.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
