|
|
Working OK for me in Firefox:
Has Chrome updated recently?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting.
No, Chrome is running the same version on Desktop and my Surface - but my Surface is showing the ads and my desktop isn't ...
Both use uBlock, both have Kaspersky IS, both on same internet connection / router / ISP.
Both running same version of Win10: 20H2 19042.867
Bingo! That was it: Kaspersky enabled Anti-banner on the desktop but not the Surface (don't know why. I haven't changed its settings for ages). Disabled for CP, ads restored.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, Kaspersky. Thanks for nothing.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Can that be added so it's obvious that it's TypeScript, not Javascript?
(Or am I just not seeing that option, haha)
|
|
|
|
|
Done 
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
|
G'day guys.
Long time CodeProject fan and consumer, new producer here. I've recently created a proper account to use and linked my blog's RSS feed to it, so the articles that I publish on my blog are syndicated to CodeProject, which is great.
I recently received an email from an editor (who I won't name, to respect their privacy) mentioning some edits to the post. They asked me to review the edits and let them know if I have any problems.
The email itself says it comes from an unattended mailbox though, and looking at the editor's profile, I don't see any means of contacting them for clarification. To be clear, their edits are fine - it's just somewhat frustrating and confusing not to be even able to say _thanks for the edits, all looking good now!_ I suspect I'm not seeing the feature since this is a new account, but I'm not sure. If so, it'd be good to actually see some indication of that, like _you need x reputation to send a message_. Though I'm not sure I agree about that policy anyway.
I guess this is both a question and a suggestion. Was my assumption correct, in that I can't send a private message due to not having enough reputation? If so, I suggest we re-think that, since it's somewhat frustrating for new users. I have no way to reply to edits made to an article now. Instead, you could perhaps not allow unverified accounts to send messages.
Sorry for my rambling!
Cheers,
Jason.
|
|
|
|
|
No, you can send messages ok - look at the bottom of this one and you'll see an "email" link which would send a private message to me - including your email address, so be sure that you want to do that before you press "Send"!
With staff editor messages there is no link in the message to let you talk to them - but you can contact her if you need to via the Article Writing Discussion Boards[^]
I get exactly the same messages!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
G'day Jason - nice to hear a voice from back home! I think we have one of those situations where it all seems so sensible and obvious to us, but a fresh set of eyes says otherwise.
I'm, going to work with the guys to get the "reply to" email address to go to submit@codeproject so that when you reply the emails will go directly back to the editors.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Quick update: The "This message has been sent from an unattended email box" is a blatant lie. You can simply reply to it and the editors will get your email no worries.
Sorry about the confusion. I'll get this fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys! Thanks for the messages, and sorry for my late reply. I've bookmarked Article Writing Discussion Boards[^] for future reference, though it's nice to know that I can just reply to the email as well - a handy hidden feature 
Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
In the "Still alives" of @OriginalGriff there is at least 30% of the accounts marked as "disabled" and with very low reports (mine was #2 in most of the disabled ones).
And there are a couple things I don't understand yet.
#1 What's the call with disabling an account instead of closing it?
#1a where are the differences between disabled and closed?
#2 Why are the reports wipped out when disabled?
#2a If there is a possibility of a 2nd chance for them and that's the reason of the wipe... why is the red flag still there?
#3 Can a disabled user come back to life again?
#3a Only with the help of CP Staff? Or are there other possibilities?
I find it a bit confusing. Could someone bring a bit of light into this?
Thank you
EDIT: Question added since it didn't got answered yet
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 14-Apr-21 7:31am.
|
|
|
|
|
This [^] was reported in the S&A and when I visited id... the message being given is a bit odd.
Quote: This article is currently in progress. This version is not yet publicly viewable
The versions list shows it as "closed" by @Richard-MacCutchan
so I suppose it is nuked.
In case I am right, then the message is a bit confusing (or wrong?)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll look into this.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
What do y'all use to syntax highlight pre blocks?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
We use a homegrown system that's based off some code Troy Marchand from Dundas Software wrote as part of their documentation system. It's been expanded and rewritten so many times it's now like Grandpa's axe.
What I've been meaning to do, forever, is either rewrite it so it uses TextMate's syntax definition, or just tax the language colourising service from the VS Code. TextMate is line by line only, whereas our coluoriser is token-based and, while it understands and can respond to newlines, it doesn't consider them especially important. So, my idea may already be doomed from the start.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. I haven’t heard the name “Dundas” in years.  Are they still around?
I was looking at JavaScript highlighters, but I can’t seem to find any that let you specify the language with the lang element. Maybe I’m just being too picky.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Dundas Software is now Dundas Data Visualization. They are going strong and all grow'd up with suits and ties and stuff.
The Javascript solutions auto-detect the language for you. From what I understood a few years ago at least one of them would simply run through all the languages it could and then choose the one that produced the highest colour score. It would then recolour using that chosen brush.
I thought it insane at the time but it makes sense: it's client side, so doesn't stress a server, and JS engines are now so fast, and the snippets using small, that you can't even notice the processing time.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
"If it ain't bust ..." 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
err...rewrite the whole thing in the latest technology in order to burn a month of productivity and opportunity while introducing new bugs at almost no change to the user experience?
At least I think that's the standard accepted answer in our industry.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot "... but add a few buzzwords to my resume."
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Posting from a temporary account because I did not feel so comfortable doing this from my real one (been pretty active for several years). But it is a real question I have, and I think it is important to discuss.
Why do I think CodeProject is dying? I am seeing a decrease of activity in almost all areas of the website:
- Quick Answers: over the years, the volume of questions has clearly gone down. Questions per day, or perhaps number of Authority points as per the Top Experts list, is the metric I am basing this on.
- Forums: more anecdotal than anything else because I do not have the hard stats here, but I also felt a decrease of activity here. Both in the programming and non-programming forums.
- Articles: the most important one in my opinion. Newly published articles get way less views and votes than they did years ago. I believe the number of new articles is also decreasing: years ago, we still had a Monthly Article competition for several topics. Now it's just one competition to rule them all. (And is January missing from this list, or did we actually skip it?)
Granted, it's not all areas. The high-profile, high-prizes competitions of the past 3 years is an area which is better than many years ago, which is cool. For the site's main activities, however, the decrease feels bit worrying.
What do I believe is the cause? This is a more difficult and speculative question.
For questions, the answer seems simplest: CodeProject cannot keep up with the popularity of Stack Overflow. I know many CPians' negative feelings on Stack Overflow and its moderation (I personally do not entirely agree there, but that is beyond this post's topic), but it is hard to deny that everyone has heard of Stack Overflow, and CodeProject is generally less known. Especially if you are a novice programmer. That is not good, because people unavoidable leave sites and communities, so you need to guarantee a certain influx.
Why are people not discovering CodeProject then? Again mostly anecdotal but years ago, CodeProject articles were very often top Google results for my search queries. Nowadays this never seems to happen anymore. That is not helping CP's overall visibility.
When it comes to questions, there is no winning against Stack Overflow there. (Their strict, disliked moderation paying off, supposedly? But I digress.) What about articles? This ties in with the fact that general article activity decreased. I am not certain why this is. Are people these days less interested in reading? Has it become more difficult to write articles on original topics, especially appealing to more novice programmers? Has the CodeProject community not caught up with today's hot technologies? Are people moving more and more to their personal blogs, or platforms like Medium? I think there is some truth in all of those aspects.
What's the way forward? I have always liked CodeProject and would hate to see the site die a slow death. I would love to hear the community's, and CP's management's, opinion on this topic. I just personally believe that something needs to change to turn the tide. I do not immediately know how, but I wanted to bring it up either way.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
It is a pity that you felt the need to hide behind a false name to start a serious discussion. What are you afraid of?
|
|
|
|
|
This is always a good discussion to have so they question I'll pose to you right off the bat is "what do you want from CodeProject"?
CodeProject was and is always about helping people code by sharing code. The forums and Quick Answers were always second to this, and as you've pointed out, StackOverflow owns that space now for better or worse. We offer Quick Answers as a direct ask-a-question-get-an-answer service for those who feel uncomfortable (or find it impossible) to ask a question on SO. It's very, very hard to walk the fine line between being firm and being rude and almost impossible to have this translate to millions of people across hundreds of cultures. We're more forgiving, more understanding that not everyone is perfect.
So CodeProject and StackOverflow serve very different audiences: we look to teach, to provide full working solutions, and we in turn ask readers to, well, read and dig in a little. Obviously tastes change over the years and there's more demand for right here right now cut and paste snippets (SO's April Fools joke of their stackoverflow Ctrl-C Ctrl-V keyboard said it all) so we definitely lose traffic to those who need to get in, get out quickly.
Discovery: yep, this is a killer, no doubt. We've spent the last 6 months or so working on performance to chase Google's Mercurial search engine demands and are now making them happy again. We hope this will translate into an increase in ranking, but overall Google's engine has, for years, been tuned to exactly what Stackoverflow offers: A question, a bite-sized answer that can be displayed in Google's search preview, and move on. It's a tough gig no doubt.
Articles: Our level of posting has been fairly consistent over the last 3 years, which is not to say I wouldn't like more. A big issue for us is one of trends. We started as an MFC site, then moved on to .NET, Web development, and now AI, Python, IoT - you name it - but our core audience is still mainly .NET. While there's an absolute bucket load of C++, MFC and .NET devs around (even VB is still very much in demand) the questions and the interest are often in newer technologies where there isn't as rich a depth of information lying around. Things are obviously still changing in the .NET and C++ world but not to the degree that other languages and technologies are constantly springing up. IF we don't have an answer or article the we won't appear in Google.
So what can you do?
- Share your code or your knowledge as an article. It doesn't have to be long. It just has to help someone - anyone. There's an insane amount of new stuff coming online every day so write about it. Let's be the first to get articles up on these new platforms, libraries, and languages
- While posting answers on online forums link to written articles on CodeProject. The reader may just get a solution rather than just an answer
- Edit questions in Quick Answers so their title better reflects the question. Make titles be something that someone would type into a search engine. This massively helps our search ranking
- Tell us what you'd like to see, keeping in mind we need to look forward, not backwards.
So again, thanks for the post. I love what we've built here and CodeProject has exceeded my wildest dreams. Obviously we can do better, so let's do it together.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
