|
Me and Og posted the answer pretty much the same time - he can type faster than me 
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, posted the same minute!
|
|
|
|
|
@OriginalGriff
It's about time you did a Oi GregUtas
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nah ... he's reliable ! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm watching you… | CommitStrip[^]
It's a good feature, but ... it does get kinda stupid from time to time ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. In a few minutes I'm going to wrestle with that thing for the rest of the day. Again. In the last few months i had a lot of fun with this feature by using VS as a text editor for my assembly code. It actually kept quiet, but once in a while I let it 'check' my code, have a good laugh at the hysterical nonsense it 'found' in my code and then build it with 0 errors or warnings. I still hope that it just drops dead one day.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
VS is quite configurable. When I first started using it, I felt all the warnings so annoying that I turned off everthing that could be turned off. Gradually, I have become accustomed to those markers it puts into the code. They are like ads in the newspaper: I can easily read the article even with an ad to the right. When it suits me, I right click it to see if it should be fixed up. Often it can be ignored (such as This variable should be made read-only, when I haven't yet written the code that willl use it), but often they are also timely reminders.
I am actually far more bothered by those editors to use a whole bouquet glaringly bright colors to identify the class of each and every token. As if I didn't know that "if" is a reserved word and "+" is an operator... In some editors, the screen looks like an art painter's palette; the code structure drowns in all the visual effects. (I do not use such editors myself, and every time some other developer displays his code in that way, I repeat to myself that his editor is not for me!  )
VS makes use of color as well, but in a much softer, limited way. It is not fat signal read, florescent green and sun-brigth yellow, on a black background, but a few less saturated colors that doesn't blind you. The way you are hinted may be as subtle as changing from black to grey color, or a discrete dotted underlining.
So today, I have turned a lot of warnings back on. It is obviously a matter of habit (those people wanting their screen to look like a caleidoscope of colors obviously have no problems focusing on the program structure). Right now I am working with Javascript (embedded in an application, so I can't use a browser's debugging facilities), and every time I run into some runtime bug/issue I long back to VS where I would have been told at editing time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And he'd have got away with if it hadn't been for those meddling kids!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only person on the planet who liked Clippy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damn it, I knew the a-holes who did that final purge didn't check their work.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yep 
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Deveaux wrote: yep
Good thing I didn't say foxtrot, you would have said 'yep' four times.
|
|
|
|
|
This really is more of a poll and not a technical question.
I'm wondering what is _really_ used to build the User Interface for python programs?
I know there is Django (web-based python that would use HTML), but what about desktop apps?
Is it still 95% Tkinter? Just curious what you Professional Python Devs are using.
EDIT
Secondary: Maybe desktop apps are just out for Python???
In that case, is that the answer...Most Python is just used for command-line scripting type of apps, data-type apps that work on data with no graphical output?
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: Maybe desktop apps are just out for Python???
That's what I like to think - I've yet to see a decent Python UI maybe you go IronPython if that's what you need
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the input. It does seem as if there isn't a great way to build a UI that python uses.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't do much Python myself, but some of the guys where I work have achieved decent results with [^]Kivy
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks I'll check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
wxPython, with the added help of wxFormBuilder, (because writing interface code/data by hand is hell).
|
|
|
|
|
Asday wrote: wxPython, with the added help of wxFormBuilder
Searched on this and I see that it says this is "bundled" with python and it is an alternative to tkinter. Thanks. Basically what I'm learning is there isn't a great way to add a GUI on top of python. But also understand Python may be used for other types of things too.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
