|
Doesn't work for me, I'm having 50 posts per page.
but for you he should be gone now. 
|
|
|
|
|
Mine is set to 0 results per page... I don't even know who or what I am replying to right now. I just had a feeling it was something about pages.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's one of them!
Oh bugger.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You must have known the whole OP was about getting you to post something - anything.
Did it work?
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
No, I spent the morning dismantling the car to fit my new hands free kit - only to reverse polarity it, make it go "foom!", and emit smoke ... 
The old one was built into the head unit, but that failed and I'm refitting the original sound system that came with the car - which doesn't have bluetooth, hence the hands free.
Replacement ordered, will be here tomorrow ... wiring corrected already ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll get you next time!
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Aha! I've worked out your secret identity[^]! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Next time say nothing, just post them, do a screenshot and then, post a "YES, we did it" with the link to the screenshot (to avoid the "no pic no happen" answers)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
"Google Calendar", "New reminder", "Post at CP", "Repeats every hour".
That should fix it ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Reading the daily news article about SSD reliability.
Quote: While this is an important and useful study, for many of us hard drives will remain primary storage for decades to come. While they are a little less reliable, and use more power, their cost per bit can't be beat.
I didn't know HDD were [measured?] less reliable than SSD. Hmmm.
My own machines have pairs of SSD's - one as a mirror (not raid, I do it manual) coz I thought it was t'other way around (HDD more reliable).
Anyway glad I future proofed and went all SSD - now see it's an even better decision than first thought.
Also noticed on Amazon the 256 G m2 SSD was $40 more then the 512 G.
- curious if caused by entry level laptop demand or losing interest in manufacturing smaller?
...lowest $/G still seems to be around 2TB - still with that quite a large $/G jump from 2T to 4T
6T spinners are cheaper than rocks (incase you're looking at paving your driveway etc),
... how cheap per GB can spinners get?
after many otherwise intelligent sounding suggestions that achieved nothing the nice folks at Technet said the only solution was to low level format my hard disk then reinstall my signature. Sadly, this still didn't fix the issue!
|
|
|
|
|
Current generation HDDs have exceptionally high density of data, that clashes with the inherent imprecision of high speed electromechanical systems.
Yet 6TB in a 3.5" format for 200€ or less are quite unbeatable. They are the modern equivalent of DAT tapes in most scenarios.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience a good quality spinner (like the Western Digital Black series) is not only more reliable than most SSDs, but when they fail, the data can in most cases be recovered by running chkdsk. When SSDs fail, they tend to fail utterly. In other words nothing can be recovered.
I use SSDs for the speed, but I keep my system drive well backed up by regularly taking an image of the drive (using Macrium Reflect) and I keep my data drive well backed up manually. I keep the backups on an external WD Black spinner.
modified 26-Feb-20 7:10am.
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience, HDDs are very, very reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
...unless "Seagate" is written anywhere on that drive.
|
|
|
|
|
Nahhh, I suppose there is one (or even a couple of) Seagate in the bunch of my very very (very) reliable hard disks.
Hard disks simply didn't fail, in my experience. I have many of them, and some are pretty dated.
|
|
|
|
|
I can realistically only speak for myself. I've only ever owned maybe 8 Seagate drives. Right now I'd say at least 5 are dead, and I can't bring myself to place much faith in the remaining ones.
Every other drive I've ever had (50+, at least), with few exceptions, is mostly Western Digital, and I don't think there's a single one of them I've stopped using because it died. Plenty have been retired because they're now so small they're no longer worth using in any machine - but they were still working the last time they were hooked up to a system.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: I can realistically only speak for myself. I've only ever owned maybe 8 Seagate drives. Right now I'd say at least 5 are dead, and I can't bring myself to place much faith in the remaining ones.
Been using Seagate since back in the 90's when they were Maxtor, been rock solid. Only issues I've had have been Desktop Barracuda drives running 24/7 for 3.5 - 5 years in a FreeNAS box and they started reporting dodgy sectors. Replace and they keep running.BR>
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
At one point in time they were okay. "The 90s" started 30 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: At one point in time they were okay. "The 90s" started 30 years ago.
And I've using them almost exclusively since then, I think it was 1993. I didn't use them once or twice in the 90's.
SSD's I pretty much use Samsung, but not enough time has passed to know if I've chosen good yet.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: Whenever a couple of drives bought at the same time (and therefore usually the same batch) broke down you could expect the rest to break within a short period of time.
I heard that too. Despite that, when I buy drives for myself here at home, I buy them in sets of 3 for my NAS (one live, one offline backup, one off-site backup). I can't say I've ever had any such issue (multiple drives failing at roughly the same time). I've been doing this starting with 2TB drives, 3, 4, 6, 8 and now 10TB drives.
That being said, this does mean there's only one of them running 24/7, and the other two are only being used for the duration of a backup update (one once a week, the other once a month, then they get rotated). So they get used very differently.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I'm definitely referring to drives with same or similar runtimes
|
|
|
|
|
When SSDs die, they die completely and without any warning. While they are great, back them up often my friends.
|
|
|
|
|
Whilethey are a little less reliable, and use more power
I suppose that depends on what they mean by "use more power". I was recently looking to add external storage to a PI4, and wondered about the difference in power usage between an HDD and an SSD. That led me to several sites like this one:
Does an SSD or HDD Consume More Power for Your Computer? - The Revisionist
The upshot is that an SSD uses more power per unit time, but since you can restart an SSD far quicker than a HDD, you can get good power savings by powering down an SSD after only a short idle time.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it will be long before SSDs of some kind will dominate the market. Prices are dropping steadily. I got a 1Tb SSD just before black Friday for around $90, odd that I got it cheaper than listed on black Friday.
Monday starts Diarrhea awareness week, runs until Friday!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
