|
That's nothing... today we had one with 17.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't it the same one? See the reply above yours. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Nope... the one I meant was earlier today and mine was #17 so probably got more
This one I didn't report it AFAIK
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It did eventually go under. I'm digging in a little to see what the delay was.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Should the '@' character be allowed in usernames?
We all know that you should never post your email address in any forum, unless you really like spam, and that CP will automatically send you an email if anyone replies to you.
So should CP allow usernames like this: akash.[DELETED]@gmail.com - Professional Profile[^]
Given the existence of spambots, bulk mailers, and phishing, isn't it just doing part of their job for them?*
* I'm not even sure but it could fall foul of GDPR, it's personal information after all, and they are specifically included, so ... but I'm not a GDPR expert ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: it could fall foul of GDPR
I'm no lawyer, but I don't think even GDPR would cover cases where users deliberately reveal their own PII. Otherwise, you'd have to moderate every single message, to ensure that nobody posted their email address, name, date of birth, etc.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Nor am I, but I'm pretty sure it's something that "no win no fee" lawyers would be prepared to argue expensively ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I'm no lawyer, but I don't think even GDPR would cover cases where users deliberately reveal their own PII.
That may be the case, Its still sticky because If I am correct, User can always says that he mistakenly entered the email in the name field and may ask where was the checks and balance from the Site?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Expensive lawyers just love little details like that!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You can't legislate for stupidity.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: You can't legislate for stupidity.
Unfortunately they can, and have done many times. Maybe you meant
You can't legislate against stupidity. 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is new, I think: An empty message moderation list with a "check all" option:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody moderated the message between the time you saw the link to moderate it and when you got to the page.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I though about that, but it persists if I wait and refresh.
If I go direct to the page via my browser history, it's still there now - and only the QA queue has items to moderate.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If navigate to the moderation page and there are no messages in moderation, then the list of messages is empty. We didn't display anything special on the page to indicate the moderation queue is now empty.
I'll add it to the bug list.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
i was asking a question about programming and my question got reported.
my question was:
i want to use football teams logos in my android app.
how can i use logos for free?
or how can i get licence for logos?
thanks in advance.
i think this website is for developers to communicate and find a solution for their programming
problems.
and i am android developer and this is my problem and it is about android app.
but i don't know why my question is reported !!!!!!!
i am very disappointed
|
|
|
|
|
The closed question shows as:
Closed because this post is not related to software development or IT.
I want to use football teams logos in my android app.[^]
And I'd say that's a bit dubious either way.
But since I replied to it before it was closed, you have an answer, even if it isn't the one you wanted.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You'd have to contact the NFL to find out what their licensing options are. Or whatever league runs the "football" teams you are referring to.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
Although it is related to an andriod app, the "issue" you are describing has almost nothing to do with programming. It is more related to resources, licenses and asking the owners for permission to use their copyrigthed logos / emblemas / pictures.
Additionally it looks a bit like a spam bait, which are questions that are used later to put publicity links for free and this is not allowed.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 15-Jan-20 10:51am.
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not edit my articles in such a way as to change the layout or add content. Thanks in advance for understanding.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies. Note taken.
Can you please let me know which article needs fixing? I'll work with you to make it right.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't necessarily need to be fixed by anyone at CP (I can roll it back (I think)). I just do stuff for a reason, and IMHO I do a pretty good job of formatting my articles.
If the edit is for a misspelling, that's fine, but in this instance, some of the layout changed, and some content was added. The only reason this is posted here is because I couldn't find a way to email her directly.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
This is worth a bit of a discussion.
We're trying to make our editor a little easier to use. We've also worked really, really hard to ensure that all articles on CodeProject have a consistent look and feel. This has been a critical point for us forever.
In order to make things consistent we limit the tags that can be added and we will go in and fix up formatting that's messed up. You've seen the sorts of things that get posted. To give every article a chance we need to sometimes hose it down and give it some fresh clothes.
One way to ensure consistency, and a way many editor components have moved towards, is to simply remove the concept of markup. You edit in design mode and there is no markup, no HTML. Your formatting is limited to what's available in the formatting options.
Personally I'm not a fan of this because I'm a control freak, but it does enable us to ensure a more consistent look and feel for new articles.
So, ultimately, what formatting do you need that would ever be removed by a CodeProject editor? To put it another way, what formatting features do you need that are "non-standard"? The only things I can think of are
- colours
- specific padding and margins
- floating elements such as images
- specific fonts (eg for discussions on design)
Anything else?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
