Welcome to the Lounge

OriginalGriff wrote:

the inner foam was missing - presumed blown to pieces

OriginalGriff wrote:

Repair, reuse, recycle ... you know it's worth it.

Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

Quote:

It doesn't take much to reach out.

Greg Utas wrote:

my guess is that you haven't yet found a division of responsibilities that yields good encapsulation. And it might just be that there isn't one.

Greg Utas wrote:

When I parse C++ to do static analysis, I also "execute" it using operand and operator stacks, which can emit a sort of stack machine pseudo-code to verify that the code was properly understood.

bool Parser::HandleParentheses(ExprPtr& expr)
{
   //  The left parenthesis has already been parsed.  It could introduce a
   //  function call, a C-style cast, or simply parentheses for precedence
   //  (evaluation order).
   //
   auto back = expr->Back();

   //  A function name must precede the arguments for a function call.  The
   //  name could follow a selection operator, as in a.f() or a->f(), which
   //  is why Back(), and not just back(), is used.
   //
   if((back != nullptr) && (back->Type() == Cxx::QualName))
   {
      TokenPtr call;

      if(GetArgList(call))
      {
         expr->AddItem(call);
         return true;
      }
   }

   if(GetCast(expr)) return true;
   return GetPrecedence(expr);
}