|
lopatir wrote: Like I said we all read news, what was gained by reposting it with nothing else said?
Like I said
Nelek wrote: I don't know what the original message was,
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the goat in your machine wrote: We all read/get the same news.
You don't speak for me.
the goat in your machine wrote: otherwise it's spam/phising on behalf of the organisations named/reporting.
Not even close. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
If the article is no blatant publicity and you use it as the source to start a debate, it is not spam.
But I agree in the "try to not repost" (if proceed).
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: If the article is no blatant publicity and you use it as the source to start a debate
Yeah but how does just reposting the article "start a debate"
by all means re-post an article, but then don't title it "let's discuss," without starting that discussion.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
If it is a repost, would you please link the first post of the topic?
I didn't see the original message... only the edited version after the answer of "the goat in your machine". So I can't say if the article linked had been already used or not.
I can recall something about this topic (can't find it, though) but not in recent times.
And anyways, I continue saying that the subject line is pretty much more an indicative for the start of a debate than many of the threads posted in the lounge.
But I can't tell for sure if it was one or not, because (again) I didn't read the original message.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
swampwiz wrote: but evidently that is considered spam.
No, it's not. Ignore those telling you it is, unless of course the site owners tell you it is.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A structure that holds a lexeme, including the symbol id and associated value
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh good. So what's a "symbol id"?
|
|
|
|
|
an id for a symbol
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
nice clue - how many letters?
ok that was erk.
How bout (4)
CARD
modified 27-Nov-19 1:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
i explain it all here
How to Build a Regex Engine in C#[^]
but basically a symbol is something you attach to an expression. as you move through text, several patterns/expressions are evaluated and the one that matches on each move is reported. The symbol id is what is reported.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
tl;dr - but I still think it's a nifty clue - hmm... now if we could do that for anagrams... hmmm
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, so it's basically a classification of the value -- such as the part-of-speech of a word.
I'm mainly asking due to my recent foray into the parsing (or probably just lexing) of JSON.
As it stands, my "tokens" are just bare strings with no classification -- or all have the implicit classification of "token".
|
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: IT WORKED ON THE FIRST TRY.
Haha, enjoy the feeling of magic 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm,
If you are trying to get back on the Visual Studio team... it ain't gonna happen there is a sign at all building entrances that says 'No witches allowed'. 
If you are looking for a job you should approach Saruman the White. I heard they are looking for witches to assist with building the network of seven palantíri[^].
|
|
|
|
|
I thought the sign was: "Don't feed the programmers"
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: IT WORKED ON THE FIRST TRY.
sits back and waits for Murphy's law* to strike
* If it worked at the first time, you did it wrong
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I did eventually find a very minor bug in it, but I fixed it.
What's funny is while I was building the code generation based on a reference implementation I made, I found a bug in the reference implementation in the process.
Though that never would have happened if I hadn't wrapped the CodeDOM.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
I am Invincible! (YouTube)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Most madmen think they are 
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: It generates a whole lot of really complicated code
That's the gold in the message.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
