|
...They know how to make a Star Wars trailer[^]
Pity the movie is unlikely to be as good* ...
* Judging by the previous two, here
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If they know how to do that, why didn't they do it?
That thing I saw was for the most part from old movies, with characters which they did their best to erase. And yeah, was that MaRey Sue with a red swiss army light saber? Shocking. Throw in some CGI and that's the best they can do? Thanks a lot.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hasn't everyone? I did. It even has its own debugger. 
Sorry, my cynicism sneaks out now and then.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have a link? I'd be very interested in having a look at it.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
I did it three employers ago. They were bought out and then I worked for the buyer for a while. The bottom line is it's a "captive" software package now, for internal use only. It was very flexible and we could do a lot with it but it wound up being used almost exclusively for one type of automation system known as a wetbench. Here's a video of one in operation : MEI Wet Processing - Full Auto Wet Bench[^]. Here's the page about the software : MEI Wet Processing Systems - IDX Flexware Software[^]. There were over a thousand systems installed the last time I checked. Although I am certain a good number of those have been de-commissioned over the years because they have a somewhat limited lifespan. I think there is at least one in just about every major semiconductor manufacturer in the world. I practically lived in clean rooms for about twenty years and I am very glad to be out of that industry.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Well,
Interesting. The software in both the screenshots and video look alot like a Wonderware HMI for SCADA.
You mentioned that you've written both an interpreted programming language and custom debugger. Could you expand more on that?
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it does look a bit like Wonderware but ours had more 3D effects. Apparently they became aware of us because one year at SemiCon in San Francisco they saw my badge and wouldn't let me enter their booth. I felt like I had really arrived. 
The language was a cross between C and FORTRAN with, as I used to say, the worst of both. It started out fully interpreted with a VM-type of design and then it morphed into a fully compiled-on-the-fly thing with native machine code generation when we heard concerns about its speed. It could be pre-compiled and loaded from a binary image also. It either called functions from DLLs that were mapped in or it executed an intrinsic operation like a computation or comparison. Everything was shared memory based and this was key to the whole system. We had the prototype definitions of all functions from the DLLs that were mapped in loaded into shared memory so it was like a pre-compiled header and it compiled very quickly. The script engine could be embedded and it was into three or four different process, including the operator interface. Every action in it like clicking a button could invoke a script function.
The shared memory part was very key. The whole system was based on it so you could access data anywhere. That forced things to be rather primitive in the sense that we could only have POD types in shared memory. There were what I called psuedo-pointers though which were actually offsets since pointers are useless outside of the owning process. Even the generated code was in shared memory and the script engine context was too. We started all of this in QNX but we became annoyed by the lack of driver support so we jumped into the Win32 world as soon as it was out and Windows NT when it was in beta. We also used Visual C++ version 1.0 with it. At that time, you could map into another process' memory space but you couldn't safely unmap from it. That was an important thing for us and meant everything had to go into shared memory. We wanted to be able to attach to a running process with the debugger, interact with it, and then detach from it so it could continue running.
The debugger was a pretty standard one for its time. It showed all of the script files used in the process and let you single step through the code, set break points, and all the standard stuff. You could also see the variables for current script function along with variables you selected to watch. This brings up one of the weakness of the design. Because everything had to be in shared memory for access by the debugger, the stack was too but it was a static stack like FORTRAN. This limited recursive functions but we never found a need to implement one so it wasn't a big deal. In retrospect, I could have made a big stack in shared memory and made the stack dynamic but I didn't think of it at the time. I was more concerned with mapping the symbols for the current function and it wasn't obvious to me how to do that dynamically then. It is now.
I mentioned QNX. We really liked its message passing, multi-processing architecture so we implemented that for Windows. With shared memory and a few synchronization events we were able to make a very fast message passing library. That made for a very flexible system architecture. We tried Windows 95 and found its context switch time to be too slow at more than ten times slower than NT so we stuck with NT. Both were out about the same time, at least in beta form. MSDN was really useful back then.
I keep writing we and that's because me and one other guy did all of this. It took about three years to get it all refined. We were very fortunate to get that much time.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Really?
A two-minute trailer with the first half consisting of old footage is exactly how not to make a trailer...IMNSHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Pity the movie is unlikely to be as good* ...
And yet we will still go and watch it on the big screen. Same with any new Trek movies 
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
No, we don't do that anymore.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Ummmm....no.
I haven't seen 7 or 8 or any that have come in-between "on the big screen" and don't intend to change that. I've seen each exactly once at a neighbor's, and that's about all the money Disney's gonna get out of me for the franchise.
I have seen the 3 Trek reboot movies in theaters (also exactly once) and, unlike every Trek incarnation that came before them, have not purchased them on disc. How bad does it have to be to break a nearly 50-year tradition? I own the very first 40-disc TOS set (which were sold as 2 episodes per disc) all the way to Enterprise.
I still watch what's being produced...but I have no incentive to spend money on them. I may make an exception for Picard, if it's any good. Just don't give me "re-imagined Klingons"...
|
|
|
|
|
I love the subtitles : [MUSIC INTENSIFIES] 
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Pity the movie is unlikely to be as good
Still, I am quite happy to have been of the generation who had the pleasure to live with the releses of Starwars movies. The bashing may be justified to some points, but this fantasy universe is still one of the best ever created and imagined.
Any maybe it really happened a long long time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, I'll go into the movie cold, Solo I saw the trailer and went 'Naahhh', saw the movie later on Amazon was pleasantly surprised. 'The Last Jedi' trailer looked better than the film...
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think it will burn out, or fade away?
It'd be kinda neat if over the next couple of days the background colour got darker and darker until all the text was just black on black and then it was replaced with a white dot in the middle of a black screen with a high pitched noise in the background ...
(Probably a fair amount of work for a silly joke though)
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And will you have more fuss to deal with when it's gone?
I was thinking maybe leave it there - read only - as a testament to man's greatness...
|
|
|
|
|
It is a soap box. It will be left alone when moving houses.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Or broken up for parts, and used for kindling. 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Only if it does not have any plastic.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
it would be really neat if it exploded like an Atomic bomb and with smoke effects, etc. and then the cries of a thousand soapbox profits will echo in the forums for days.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: the cries of a thousand soapbox profits prophets will echo in the forums for days.
FTFY
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Time for me to call it a day. 
|
|
|
|
|
I can see where the confusion is possible...profit/prophet/chosen one.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
