|
And we are truly the architects of our obsolescence. Just wait 'til I get some code generators wired up to these AI projects I see on here all the time. 
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Happened to me the other way round: I have somewhat always liked coding and, well, designing software, but it was a rather insignificant hobby until I landed my current programming job which made me enjoy DYI electronics for realsies. Now I'm an avid DYI hobbyist, thanks to my job.
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve been retired now for almost 8 years. I spent the last 15+ years preceding my retirement as a consultant (contractor), working for banks, specializing in lending applications, commercial and mortgage lending. I spent the previous 30 years working for three major banks, specializing in lending applications. As a consultant, I was able to charge upwards of $175.00 per hour, always triple digit rates, expenses included. Most assignments lasted about 6 months. Although the longest was 2 ½ years. I’ve worked on every continent except Antarctica. I enjoyed the work and especially the money.
I mention the foregoing not to brag, but to point out that I didn’t have much variety in my specialty domain nor much choice in computer languages, yet made worthwhile career. Banks still have applications in COBOL, but many other ancillary applications in languages popular for the time: dBase, Clipper, and Visual Basic 6. I sold my time and my expertise, which many companies were willing to pay my rate and terms most often without question.
I studied changes in lending laws as well as kept up with computer languages popular for the time. Becoming the best at what I did made me known as an expert in my domain. Computer languages , most often weren’t even a consideration.
I enjoy programming, I’ve been studying C# and SQL Server. Being able to exploit software features wasn’t an objective, providing a solution to a problem was.
Early in my career my manager gave me the following advice: Work to live, not live to work. There’s just too much more in life than twiddling bits.
|
|
|
|
|
Love-god (on the edge) in a spin about planetoid (8)
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
modified 7-Aug-19 7:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
Asteroid ?
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Nope
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
That's a relief - I had the same. I figured EROS for the love god but couldn't fit ATID into the rest even as an anagram, except AT ID which didn't make any sense.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Same as but thought I'd eliminate it ( picked my practice lock today with a single pick ( no raking yet))
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I think I know the solution, but I'm not fit to set a themed CCC for tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't have to do a themed clue
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
BALLSACK
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
I see where you're coming from there 
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Best wrong answer as always!
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
prolapse
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Kerberos?
Eros from the love god, as others have hinted. Not sure on the rest though, so I assume it's wrong... I guess it could be Kerb like the thing on the edge of pavement?
|
|
|
|
|
I think you have it there 
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Yay!
That's the one.
I was being a little naughty in not having an overly literal literal i.e "in a spin about planetoid" but I figured that people would know that it was likely to be a moon.
I was going to add a hint (as I'm on the road tomorrow) that the "plantoid" would have been "planet" a few years back as poor old Pluto has been demoted (rather unfairly to my mind but we'll save that particular hot topic for the Soapbox, where it belongs)! 
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I actually thought "planetoid" on it's own was the indicator for moon, and the spin bit was just to indicate swapping Eros and Kerb around. Now you have explained it, it's a nice way to say moon
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: I guess it could be Kerb like the thing on the edge of pavement?
Or Eros (love-god) at the end of the word.
|
|
|
|
|
Preface: I am learning Git (since some years  , very slowly) and English is not my native language. So, I don't know that what I believe about 'check-in' and 'check-out' is correct in English or not.
If I am in/on a Git branch, shouldn't it be called 'checked in branch' instead of 'checked out branch'?
If I 'checkout' (from) a branch then shouldn't it actually get me out of that branch?
And what is the command to 'get out from current branch'?
Is it possible that I am not in/on any Git branch?
|
|
|
|
|
I use Sourcetree, much easier using a UI
|
|
|
|
|
It's like a library: you join the library, and they give you a membership ticket.
You want a book, you hand it and the ticket to the librarian and she records that you have it and you can take it away to read.
When you are finished, you return the book and she records against your ticket that you returned the book.
Getting the book is called "checking out", returning it is called "checking in". These terms have been used for hundreds - possibly thousands! - of years, and they refer to historical usage when the identity of the book was physically checked against the records and your library ticket.
When source control was invented, these terms were adopted for pretty much the same events: to get a copy of the code, you "checked out" the branch. When you are done modifying, you "checked in" your changes.
English can be a strange language, and you shouldn't take technical terms too literally! 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Except when you check out that book what happens is that the librarian creates an exact duplicate for you to borrow.
When you bring the book back the librarian then has to find the book on the shelf and duplicate all the crumpled pages, missing pages, dog ears and notes you have put in the margin of the page.
Woe betide should you have borrowed the same book at the same time as someone else and both added different notes to the same page or crumpled the same page in a different manner.
Now when you check the book in the librarian has to figure out whether your page crumple or that of the other person should be applied to the book being held in stock.
I feel sorry for librarians.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
GuyThiebaut wrote: I feel sorry for librarians.
Been doing this = managing the main source code stream for several years in a team of more than 50 people. Never again. Librarian is highly interesting since you are the one knowing every single part of the code after some time, but resolving conflicts, in the code while merging and of course among the developers in the team, is exhausting.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
