|
the only ones i've noticed that do that are the ones connected to the heist mission.
there's a donut chain or something i use to bank with because it doesn't fluctuate that much.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had good luck sticking with the first few entries (listed alphabetically by name). I find the other ones way too unpredictable. Or they'll nosedive and then never recover.
|
|
|
|
|
maybe the doughnut place is just lucky for me. =)
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
"The doughnut place". I'll have to look for it. It doesn't ring a bell. You sure it wasn't just one of the fast-food chains? Or coffee shops?
|
|
|
|
|
it might have been a coffee shop. one of the shops reminded me of dunkin doughnuts for some reason.
i haven't played in over a year. Forgive me. =)
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
adding, if you're patient, at the beginning of the game, or at least by the time you've opened up trevor and can drive him to the city:
there's a briefcase off the coast of a major beach with $10,000 in it and it respawns. if you swim above it, dive. grab it. resurface. quick save. Load. Repeat. you can get starting out money for each of them.
Then all you have to do is wait until the assassination missions to do investing - all but the first you hold off until after the end-game heist.
you can get them investing equal amounts with a bit of grinding and then they will all have about the same amount of money, but you have to plan for it and work for it, and it's a bit of a cheese move.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
codewitch honey crisis wrote: there's a briefcase off the coast of a major beach with $10,000 in it and it respawns
I've heard about that one, and my understanding is that Rockstar became aware of this and they've released a patch, so it no longer respawns.
codewitch honey crisis wrote: Then all you have to do is wait until the assassination missions to do investing
Yeah, that's what all those "get rich quick in GTA5" posts/videos discuss--wait until after the storyline missions to be completed before doing the assassination missions. However, at this point, I'm not going to restart the game once more...
|
|
|
|
|
last time i played it still works.
I understand not wanting to start the game again. But, assuming you're not doing so right now, eventually you may dust it off a year or more down the line and achieve the "100%" rating, at that point you can try to maximise your heist earnings.
I think you can get it as high as 3 or 4 bili, but like i said, you have to keep all but 2 on the market - which you then treat as a volatile "bank" of sorts, although I've noticed a lot of the non-story significant stocks don't change in price that much.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - if there's still a limit, then I'm happy enough knowing I've reached the "first limit" and not spend any more time trying to reach the second.
It's also unlikely I'm ever going to restart the game...I've been stuck at 99.56% for a very, very long time now, and all that's missing is winning a golf game at or under par (not likely to happen, the way things have progressed), and tennis, which I'm apparently useless at--and I find it so boring I can't bring myself to spend time retrying.
Not sure if you know anything about this...but am I correct in my understanding that there's still a few things you can do/unlock if the account used with the PC game is also associated with the Xbox 360/PS3 version (not XB1/PS4)...? If so, I may still get that (given how cheap it is nowadays)...not that I intend to play it on a console...
|
|
|
|
|
I think so. I know you get extra goodies if you bought both the PS3 and PS4 version (which I did)
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it enough to let the game know you own the other version, or do you have to actually play it on the other platforms...I hate console controllers with a passion - I've played GTA4 a tiny bit, for example - but there's no way I'd ever try to complete it
|
|
|
|
|
that's a good question. If i had to guess, i think just signing in with the game once is probably enough to do it.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Everett Dirksen once said, "A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money."
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
While a small number of people in the world are well past the Int32 limit (two billion) on their bank account and are heading to the Int64 limit (9 quintillion, that's a 9 with 18 zeros) most of us (still relatively rich developers) struggle to get even past the Int16 limit (32 thousand).
Of course most people don't even need a byte (255) to store their financials.
Think about that, I'm saying we're relatively rich with just 32,000 when there are people who have 5 million times as much! 
Capitalism has failed, but I don't know of a better alternative...
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Capitalism has failed, but I don't know of a better alternative...
I disagree, but the debate would be better suited for the Soapbox...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just saying the extravagantly rich are getting even richer while the poor are getting poorer (or at least not richer).
I guess that's part of capitalism so it hasn't particularly failed.
So maybe what I mean is that it's not a suitable economic and political system to live by (but still better than the tried alternatives, like communism).
If a system allows for seven people to be as wealthy as about 4 billion other people combined it's not a very good or fair system (and I know, those people aren't necessarily poor because of capitalism, but corruption as well).
Anyway, I was just giving my 2 cents (a day's work in some countries) without necessarily engaging debate 
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: heading to the Int64 limit (9 quintillion, that's a 9 with 18 zeros)
...but barely getting started. This 2017 article claims "...the total wealth in the world" to be $280 trillion.
Sander Rossel wrote: Capitalism has failed, but I don't know of a better alternative...
Loopholes in the various taxation systems have allowed it to fail. It can be corrected. You just need to have politicians willing to pass new laws (and commit political suicide in the process, which is why it won't happen)
|
|
|
|
|
[^]Quote: Within that document, you could create tables with formulas, similar to how you could with later integrated packages such as Microsoft Works or the modern Web document processors Quip or Coda. The Cat even allowed you to include computer code in the middle of a document that could be executed with a button press.
Instead of a mouse, the Cat had two thumb-accessible buttons under its space bar for its signature navigation/selection feature, Leaping. Say, for example, you wanted to navigate to the word ” feline” 150 lines up from the current cursor position (and thus offscreen). To move the cursor to the word, you would hold down the Leap key, type the first few letters (“fel”) and release the Leap key when the cursor arrived at its intended destination. Leaping was also used to highlight text, after which it could be formatted, moved, erased or printed. It married the efficiency of keyboard shortcuts with the intuitiveness and free-form access of graphical interfaces.
Video: [^]
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
This is the first time I ever saw one, and I was around for the pc revolution. Cool video. thank for posting.
|
|
|
|
|
So there's this tool, GOLD Parsing System - A Free, Multi-Programming Language, Parser Generator[^] that hasn't been updated since like 2012 or so.
It is (was?) a popular parser generator that uses a LALR(1) parsing algorithm.
I've written a LALR parser before and was thinking about reviving the project.
However, one of the things it could do was directly import this guy's material- including all of the grammars people have built for his parser over the years- into my system.
Not only that, my system is more powerful than his. So doing so comes with a number of advantages.
That being said, if I do this, and my project picks up any steam at all I'll have basically eclipsed his project.
And because it could use his grammars, a large part of the reason it could eclipse his is using his own material to do so.
Is this wrong of me? Should I remove that feature?
Edit: I haven't heard back from him so far. It's been over a month.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
modified 27-Jul-19 15:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried contacting him? He has a contact address on the site. If you don't hear from him after a couple attempts and a few weeks, then ask here. 
|
|
|
|
|
i should have mentioned that i did try contacting him.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
No need:
Quote:
The GOLD Freeware License Agreement
This software is provided 'as-is', without any expressed or implied warranty. In no event will the author(s) be held liable for any damages arising from the use of this software.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose. If you use this software in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be deeply appreciated but is not required.
In the case of the GOLD Parser Engine source code, permission is granted to anyone to alter it and redistribute it freely, subject to the following restrictions:
The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not claim that you wrote the original software.
Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be misrepresented as being the original software.
This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution
So include the notices, add him to the "About" box, and thank him - and include a github link to your project if that's open as well.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
i mean yeah, legally i'm within my rights or i wouldn't even be asking this. I just don't think this was what he intended.
still, you're right, I am on solid ground there. So why do I feel bad enough about it to ask the question?
Maybe a question for a shrink. 
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the fact that he licensed it the way he did was an invitation to use his stuff without worry.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
