|
Iiiiigit, why not invest in a Espresso machine. Heat up in between something around 20 seconds and get a more or less fresh Cup of coffee?
Sorry  and all the best 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: concert tickets to see Dream Theater
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: that lasts around 2.5 hours on a charge
so you make your coffee, and realise you forgot to charge the cup.
...anyway I'd never take that long to drink a cup of coffee, unless I fall asleep half way through (which does happen once in a while and no, it's never decaf), in which case I make a fresh one.
(In fact anything over 10 mins (very rare) is pour out and make another, I can't abide stale coffee.)
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Got a bag of loose white tea for Christmas 
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm,
According to the TIOBE Index the self-heating java mug is the most popular programming utility of 2018.
JAVA MUG
The Visual Basic mug was the second most popular and the C# mug came in third-place this year. Unfortunately the C++ mug came in last place again signaling the decline of this once popular programming utility.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
I thought about getting one of these for my wife to keep her tea warm due to this thread. I found it on Amazon and everything looks great until you read the reviews. Three things keep popping up. Delamination occurs after a few weeks, the springs in the charger contacts fail causing the charger to no longer work, and the app is buggy causing it not to work on Android devices.
Ember Temperature Control Ceramic Mug, Black
When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others.
Same thing when you are stupid.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
If the app won't install on your tablet, then just get any random app that keeps the CPU busy. Then flip the tablet over, and place the mug on top of the spot where the CPU is.
(not entirely joking...)
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: or Windows Phone
Err...because they want to support phones that most people use? And ones that people will be using in the future?
Realistically though it probably supports whatever devices the single developer working on the project already knew. Or at least I am hoping it didn't take a team of 100 developers to make that app.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not getting it: Why do you need to keep the mug warm for 2 h 20 minutes, after you have emptied it?
|
|
|
|
|
That was my first thought. 
|
|
|
|
|
But what about those times when you have a problem piece of code? The normal solution is to wander over and get another coffee, by the time you get back you can see the answer. This mug sounds counterproductive to me.
|
|
|
|
|
ormonds wrote: This mug sounds counterproductive to me.
Well it is on the small side, so more trips to the coffee pot, but less waiting on the microwave. If it's a tough problem, I go out to the woodshed. 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
ormonds wrote: by the time you get back you can see the answer
... but we were talkin Java here!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow.
So at least one person has woken up and smelled the coffee -- about 20 years late, but at least he got there.
On a couple of the major points:
The fake advertising clicks/views thing will never go away, and will, in fact, get worse until it achieves the downhill slope on the balance of how much the main web-advertising businesses can screw out of businesses.
Google and fb don't care if clicks/views are faked, because they get paid a lot more per click/view than the scammers do.
And their customers don't care too much, because the money comes out of their tax-deductible advertising budget, so as long as they can say "this campaign drew n more sales, which covered our costs, they will continue to cough up -- until, as I say, that happy balance tips the wrong way, and the costs outweigh the investment by too big a margin.
The outcome of that will probably be a reduction in the per-click/view price, which will make it less attractive to some of the scammers, so the balance will level off -- until the next time.
___
The bot traffic will never go away, partly because a reasonable proportion of it (perhaps as much a 15%) is genuine stuff, which helps the Interwebs function and is there for proper business purposes; but mostly because there will always be a huge supply of people who want to do things that no decent person would do -- and it's unlikely that there will ever be a reliable, robust way of telling the bad bots from the genuine ones.
There will always be enough bandwidth for you to stream your funny cat videos, so live with it.
___
One change that we are pretty much guaranteed to see, over the next couple of years, is a reduction of the reliance on unregulated news sites, half-arsed blogs, and wikis (yes, I'm looking at you, wikipedia), because, thankfully, the majority is beginning to recognise the fact that their accuracy (or, at least, their professionalism in attempting to be accurate) cannot be relied upon.
Such sites will, of course, always exist, but the tendency to cite them is already on the way down, because people don't like being ridiculed for having believed made-up or distorted crap from click-bait web-sites. We can be thankful that the words "reputation" and "trust" are being used more, where it comes to news.
___
Faked videos?
Bring 'em on! I look forward to seeing how creative and satirical people can get!
Who doesn't want to watch a "fixed" oscars ceremony, where everyone admits how much they hate the guts of the @rseholes they worked with; or see a certain inhabitant of a particularly coloured house open his mouth and something true come out of it?
Click-baiting, unregulated news sites will of course jump on such videos and try to portray them as real, but this will only push everyone to treat such sites as entertainment, while they rely the more professional sites for the real news.
___
It's the Interwebs. It will never be perfect, because no three people will ever agree on what perfect is, in this context; but it's been in a bad dip, where ontrustworthiness became the norm, and it's beginning to recover, so it ain't all doom and gloom.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: but this will only push everyone to treat such sites as entertainment, while they rely the more professional sites for the real news
Just checked on Fox and CNN, they're still not funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Really?
They always make me laugh.
Or cry, depending on the grammar.
I'm pretty sure that neither reaction is their intention, but that's about all they ever get out of me.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
And MSNBC. Their news is real but the interpretation should be questioned.
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever you find one that leaves the interpretation to me, tell me please.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: One change that we are pretty much guaranteed to see, over the next couple of years, is a reduction of the reliance on unregulated news sites, half-arsed blogs, and wikis (yes, I'm looking at you, wikipedia), because, thankfully, the majority is beginning to recognise the fact that their accuracy (or, at least, their professionalism in attempting to be accurate) cannot be relied upon.
there is a problem in your theory cause i do get to see tons of brainwashed people who do believe in their fake sites and fake news and believe in what they seen or read there and will defend it till the end, and when you show them the evidences of it being fake they just say its the other sides propaganda and that everyone lies. And i just lose my will to argue with them or try and open their eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a real reply by a real human containing real content...damn forgot what I was going to say!
I may not be that good looking, or athletic, or funny, or talented, or smart
I forgot where I was going with this but I do know I love bacon!
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: damn forgot what I was going to say!
That's the most convincing proof in the world that you're real.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
and older than dirt!
I may not be that good looking, or athletic, or funny, or talented, or smart
I forgot where I was going with this but I do know I love bacon!
|
|
|
|
|
So if they can replace pizza makers with robots why can't the replace ad viewers with robots?
|
|
|
|
|
That’s a whole different subject. Don’t get me started. Besides, are robots smart enough know they are viewing the same ad?
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
