|
I would like three or four monitors plus the notebook. I now have two monitors plus the notebook and there is no room for anything else. I will be getting another computer fairly soon so it will a challenge to figure out what to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Rick York wrote: not enough room for everything I want to have on it.
Is there even such a thing?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the desk I previously had was just right with lots of room. I had to change desks and it was a huge step down.
|
|
|
|
|
I always demand a corner office or nothing.
No prizes for guessing which I normally get.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I demand the role of CEO or nothing.
Unfortunately, I know how to tie my own shoelaces, which makes me overqualified for most CEO jobs 
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Going from one person per less than a square meter with about 16 people crammed in a tiny room to one person per about two to three square meters with twelve in a bigger room.
Where is your workplace? Calcutta?
When I see that kind of space/person, the movie Soylent Green comes to mind.*
*I have 20-25 m2 office with an occasional room-mate. Even the clerks at their cubbies have about 2 m2 for the desktop. If I'm not mistaken, even a prison cell has more space than you currently get at your improved location.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: I have 20-25 m2 office with an occasional room-mate
That's a luxury not many of us get (although that's how I started).
I guess I have a little more than three square meters, depending on which desk I sit at.
At least the room is pretty spacious, so it's not as claustrophobic as my old workplace (which was really just horrible).
Today I was sitting next to the cutest girl in the office, so I kind of wanted the one square meter back 
W∴ Balboos wrote: If I'm not mistaken, even a prison cell has more space than you currently get at your improved location
But those people have to live there, I only have to write code there 
|
|
|
|
|
When we first moved in to our new building, everyone had 10x10 (feet) cubicles. After a period of increased hiring, we were running out of room, so they downsized all of the cubicles to 7x10 feet.
Almost immediately the company started having financial difficulties, and began laying people off.
After several years of layoff happening every 6-9 months, my floor of about 60 cubicles has only about 20 occupied.
No one has bothered suggesting re-upsizing the cubicles.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
A cubicle sounds even worse than an open space office.
We get like 1 x 2 m desks, but at least I can look outside and talk to my coworkers.
I don't think the cubicle is a thing here in the Netherlands, I've never actually seen one anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Wheeler wrote: my floor of about 60 cubicles has only about 20 occupied
Sounds like the problem solved itself then...?
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly, yes.
My team has gone from 14 people down to 5. We 5 have had to assume responsibility for those 14 folks' work, along with several other smaller products for people from other groups that have been laid off as well. This has also resulted in a 'brain gap', where we have no one on staff immediately capable of debugging customer issues. We now have very slow response times, angry customers, and trips to customer sites by engineers. Of course, this reduces our pace on new products even further.
This is not a happy workplace, unless you count the gallows humor  .
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I once got paid to stick around for months at a company that had been purchased by a bigger fish, and they needed someone on-site who knew our system while they transitioned to something else at their head-office.
Myself and our accountant had 6,000 square feet split amongst the two of us.
|
|
|
|
|
I was reading an article on Entrepreneur.com (entrepreneur magazine) and forgot about the tab.
At first I blamed Firefox when I saw that it had eaten over 4 Gigabytes of ram and lots of CPU. 
Then I investigated more closely and closed individual tabs until I found the bad one.
See the taskmanager output here : https://i.stack.imgur.com/USEhP.png[^]
Then I decided to load up Chrome and see what would happen on that page:
It's not been loaded as long but it's at 1.2GB and climbing and eating CPU too.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/fd8vI.png[^]
I know I shouldn't expect anything better than this from a cheap magazine web site...but I do!!! 
I think more sites than we expect do this kind of terrible behavior too.
Well, at least CP seems to be a good net citizen. 
|
|
|
|
|
You should've used IE. 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Forogar wrote: You should've used IE
Definitely. IE is making a comeback...with Windows XP!!
|
|
|
|
|
second this! IE does stop loading after 10% of the site(because of some internal problems) and therefore does use neither memory nor cpu
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Seamonkey. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
CodeProject is actually pretty good browsable on Lynx 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Go ahead and make them feel bad about it. Show them what they're doing wrong, and that a high school kid could fix it for them in about 10 minutes. Or to expedite the process, offer to fix the problem yourself at whatever your premium rate is, multiplied by some factor.
|
|
|
|
|
I think they know how terrible it is because they basically run numerous streaming videos as you try to read the article. It's a terrible site. Don't go there. It's now off the list or I will pull the articles back with my text browser.
|
|
|
|
|
FWIW, I suspect one of their advertisers is responsible for that. I have a lot of them shutdown with a massive HOSTS file so I didn't see any memory hogging.
|
|
|
|
|
Are they trying to mine bitcoins with your equipment?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Are they trying to mine bitcoins with your equipment?
That's exactly what I was thinking too. I wouldn't rule that out as a cause.
|
|
|
|
|
In the old days, all web browsers had a command to stop animated GIFs from executing. Just putting a few such GIFs into your web page could drive your CPU into saturation.
I am of course talking about those days when I was running a 25 MHz 386 with a luxurious amount of RAM, 512 kByte.
For some reason, you never see any "Stop GIF animations" command in today's browsers. Maybe it should be brought back, and extended to cover all background activity, whether sound, video, animations or whathaveyou.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
