|
kmoorevs wrote: I never use external js resources for web apps, especially if they are out of my control. Am I being paranoid?
If you need to support Internet Explorer, that's the only solution.
For almost all other browsers, subresource integrity would ensure that the script you load from a CDN hasn't been changed since you first linked to it:
Subresource Integrity - Web security | MDN[^]
But if it's your local AV software injecting the script into your browser, then all bets are off.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard, Thanks for the informative link, but unfortunately I have to support IE. I did learn something though! 
Richard Deeming wrote: But if it's your local AV software injecting the script into your browser
The local AV was indeed injecting a link to a .js resource on their website. When I checked, the subscription was expiring in just a couple of days so I simply uninstalled it. No more problems. In fact, this fixed a really strange problem I had been having with this laptop where typing in IE was regularly missing keystrokes. (really bad on here on CP)
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: typing in IE was regularly missing keystrokes
There was a similar problem here a while back, when Chris accidentally made the script that updates the message preview use synchronous AJAX requests. Typing anything became incredibly painful, as the browser froze after every key press until the server responded.
It almost sounds like your AV was injecting a poorly-written key logger into your browser. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
... and they had drawn all over my face with permanent marker.
Was I really that drunk?
I'm a terrible babysitter. 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried out some pink rubber baby squid lures on a mackrel rig, 5 hooks, a light weight, off Teignmouth. Only about 600 yards out, put them in and literally within 10 minutes, 4 good sized mackrel!
That is a damned effective lure!
Got them off the net, from Japan I think, bloody amazing!
Too good though, I wanted to spend the afternoon out there, but dont need any more fish than that, you cant freeze them, so had to come in. 
|
|
|
|
|
So kiss 'em, and let 'em go!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
F*** that, Thai red curry!
(I dont torture animals for fun, I eat what I catch. )
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer chicken in my Thai Red Curry (but I'm doing fish tacos for supper tonight) - enjoy your mackerel though!
Are you making your own paste, or buying it in? I'll admit to buying Mae Ploy paste because cleaning the mortar and pestle after making the paste is too much like hard work...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: Got them off the net, from Japan
The Japanese are amazing fisherman and makers of most anything, really.
When you have time, there are some videos of Japanese craftsman making bamboo fishing poles and fishing in general, on YouTube - very cool...at least for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: you cant freeze them
Is that because they are an "oily" fish?
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is just mackerel, it has to be eaten fresh. Even after a few days it isnt as good. Mind you most fish doesnt freeze that well, except skate IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
It would shock you to see what tiny stuff we have to fish with up here.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you try gummy worms?
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
Are those the rubbery lug work lures? I have a lot of those too, and fake cray fish in the same box.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm thinking the real gummy worms that people eat  . Haven't try it myself, just thought about it, maybe I'll try it next time.
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
They will probably fall apart in the water, and I doubt they have a flavour fish would be interested in. 
|
|
|
|
|
Mixed it with the squid 🤪 . Sweet and stinky = yummy to the fish
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: Too good though, I wanted to spend the afternoon out there, but dont need any more fish than that, you cant freeze them, so had to come in. 
Smoke and refrigerate. Or simply give one to your neighbours in exchange for social points.
Good fish, but a bit pricey in the supermarket, and probably not as good as your fresh ones 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
If I had a smoker...
Yes, could get some for the friends and relos I guess. But you are right about it being best fresh, it is a nice fish fresh.
Next time I want to target some flounder, pollack and bass. Maybe a dog fish even.
|
|
|
|
|
... "Plastic Surgery Addicts Anonymous". I can see some new faces here today, and I have to say, I'm very disappointed in you all.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 4-Aug-18 4:12am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: "Plastic Surgery Addicts Anonymous". I can see some new faces here today, and I have to say, I'm very disappointed in you all. you're all a bunch of boobs.
FTFY
Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have film. Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
I saw this NY Times article The $3 Billion Plan to Turn Hoover Dam Into a Giant Battery[^]
Is it just me, or is this about the stupidest $3 billion boondoggle ever?
Rather than pumping water that you've just released through the dam, back into the reservoir behind the dam, why not just let less water flow through the dam and supplement the shortfall with the solar energy? You'd be thermodynamically ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems storage of bulk power is still an issue so if they have an oversupply of say solar energy they turn it off. Pumping water uphill would use that over supply instead of turning it off and the water at the top of the dam basically act as a storage device. What happens to unused electricity on the National Grid? | Science Focus[^]
justifying 3bn expenditure is another matter
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the concept of pumping water uphill into a reservoir as energy storage. And yes, a hydroelectric dam is what you use for this kind of energy storage.
The part I don't get, is where one uses a large dam like Hoover Dam for this. The thing's on a river. You can't pump more water upstream than you're letting flow downstream through the dam. The best you can do, is to pump all the water you let through back up. If you've got that much solar energy that you can do that, then you have more than enough to replace all of the electricity you get by letting any water through the dam. In fact, because of losses, you actually have more than enough energy.
Unless they're getting water from somewhere else, and the article doesn't say they're doing that, then this make absolutely no thermodynamic sense.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
