|
Can you please send me a link that failed to work?
We need to look up the message by message ID to get the location of that message, and from there we get the forum. Everything's cached so there shouldn't be any issues. Database loads (the way we did it a few years ago) have a limiter that stops you going back too far in order to limit the pain on the server.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There were several that I tried, and when I tried newer ones, the newer ones worked as expected.
I'm probably hitting the limiter. The messages I was trying to load were from 2001. However, if they're in the list, I should be able to see them when I click on them, correct?
In any case, here's a link to a message from 2000.
The Lounge[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
There shouldn't be any limit. A message from 2001 is something dark and dusty. If you have the ID I'll put on my Stetson, grab a torch and enter the archives.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
15297
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Lately I have noticed some questions tagged as "C++14", or variants of that, appear on the main page when the "All" option is selected but when I click on "C++" those questions no longer appear. I think they should appear in the C++ category also. I noticed another one just now that I answered.
|
|
|
|
|
Done. The change will take a bit to propagate.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to vote for this answer[^] reloads the page, and displays a validation error for the "new solution" box. The vote is not recorded.
There's also a problem with the display of the rating control, and the dreaded "f.tabs is not a function" error:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Should be good now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, all working now. Thanks. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm really getting tired of being downvoted on my Q/A answers because the OP CHANGED HIS QUESTION after I posted my answer, rendering my answer in some way invalid.
Is there any convenient way to resolve this? I'm sick right now, so my mind ain't workin' at full capacity, otherwise, I'd offer at least one way this could be addressed.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
You have been voted "smaller 5" in about 5 answers from total about 100 in this year. Where is the Problem?
Btw: Of course, I can understand the Frustration to get negative points while trying to help.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not complaining about the points. I'm complaining about being downvoted *after* the OP changes the question, with that change rendering my solution invalid.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I think to understand you. The question is, was it really OP? I hope not!
Whenever I asked a question and somebody tried to help me I never voted below a 3, except it was obviously a spammy answer.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: I think to understand you
No, you don't.
0x01AA wrote: The question is, was it really OP?
He is not saying, the OP downvoted him. He is saying, someone voted him down... AFTER an edit of the question. This edit, made the previous posted answer look bad.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Adding insult to injury, my answer (after reviewing the new version of the question) is STILL valid.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Allowing a questioner to vote on a solution is problematic. Apart from the matter you raise some questioners are simply not qualified to rate an answer and sometimes hastily reject perfectly good solutions. I'd say just allowing the OP to accept one or more answers is all that is needed.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Is there any convenient way to resolve this?
I have edited answer(s) in the past using something like:
[EDIT]
This answer is for the initial question. The question has been modified meanwhile so that the answer might not apply anymore.
[/EDIT]
|
|
|
|
|
I saw that case. I was thinking that OP voted 1 (I voted 5, as it was a totally unperfect answer for a totally unperfect questin - perfect fit  )...
You can not change these thing, so it is better to getting over... "just make believe it's nothing"
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
The only real solution here is to remove all answers to questions that are modified.
Or, in a perfect world, to have the community remove (not downvote) answers that no longer suit a question that's been modified.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Could it be possible to lock the first version of a question after, say 10 minutes?
The later versions would only be addendum to the original and would be shown separately.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't post a Q/A answer (says server is too busy).
Sunday morning, 7:30am central time
-----------
Seems okay now. Nevermind.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 18-Mar-18 9:36am.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a fairly regular issue on Sundays. I guess that's when the big houskeeping jobs are running.
|
|
|
|
|
I was deploying updates. Bad timing...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Should I notify you when I'm on the site so you can reschedule that kind of thing?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
