|
But are the managers safe?
|
|
|
|
|
Replacing them probably would be easier and more effective and easier to accomplish. 
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: But are the managers safe?
I hope so. We don't really want them on the beach enjoying retirement with us, do we?
|
|
|
|
|
I think so; the AI will delegate to the managers; who will, etc.
No smart AI would want to deal with users / humans.
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then".
― Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
so the managers then become the developers using AI as a tool?
|
|
|
|
|
Only if AI stands for artificial insanity. Those good people are unable to say what they want, refuse to waste a thought on the consequences when they finally make up their minds and change their minds quicker than the average woman at a shoe sale.
They need someone who tells them what's wrong with their ideas, just like a mother explains things to a retarded child. Without that they will go overboard completely and probably cry for someone to come and fix that defective AI.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny enough that's what I was thinking last night while watching this:
Will Artificial Intelligence Take Over The World? - YouTube
It's a "Thoughty2" video, and while the channel has gone a bit down hill of late, this one did catch my eye.
He's trying to be a bit of a dramatic doom bringer, but he does bring up some interesting points, and yes that was exactly what I was thinking.
which to be fair is what most folks are saying on the subject too.
It's not that AI is inherently dangerous, or is going to snap up all our jobs, it's that WE, the HUMAN RACE are the ones that are designing it, in our image, and WE ARE the dangerous ones.
SO ultimately, it's not that AI will take our jobs, it's the people who will be designing it that want to take our jobs away from us, and if you think about the economics behind business, well how much more money would be available to give out to the fat cats as "Performance Bonuses" if they didn't have a work force that needed paying.
Ultimately someone will design an AI system, that will take software developers jobs, because they will see a way to use it to increase their own net worth.
Just sayin
Shawty
=========================================================
Update 5 mins later:
And just as if there was some grander design for me.... I opened my next email newsletter, and here's one of the main articles:
Here are some of the ways experts think AI might screw with us in the next five years - The Verge
YIKES!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
After 42+ years of doing corporate development under the aegis of many incompetent technical managers, I am looking forward to this. Hopefully, it will force a lot of corrupt organizations out of business...
Steve Naidamast
Sr. Software Engineer
Black Falcon Software, Inc.
blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com
|
|
|
|
|
I also had my share. Having to work in such places is like hell and their products usually look like that. By now I tend to walk out of job interviews as soon as I get that impression. So yes, let them try their luck with AI. I wonder who they want to blame then for the results.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
|
|
|
|
|
They will do the same thing we do, ignore what was asked for and do it the way we want.
|
|
|
|
|
When they can solve and explain the answers to CCC, then I'll take notice.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be happy if there'll be any form of intelligence at all 
|
|
|
|
|
Soon I hope..rather than have to deal with all these JavaScript Frameworks eating your brain...
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about you, but I use my brain in my job so no AI will ever take over my job.
And I'm having deja vu about your post. 
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
I keep using the same argument all the time: Given how easy it is for all computers I've ever used to fail miserably just trying to keep themselves up to date without my help, I'm not too worried about them taking over anything.
|
|
|
|
|
AI is a myth if you ask me. It is impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's let AI start in the QA forum... If he doesn't give up after that we'll promote him.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: What she put together in just a few weeks would have taken me months to do manually.
Not because of AI but because some developers built a great tool.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
011111100010 wrote: Not because of AI but because some developers built a great tool.
Agreed!  I guess an AI based tool wouldn't have needed my help at all! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Now you make us curious what tool she used !
But of course, being an integer person, you can not mention that here as that would be considered as spamming 
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, gotta stay as vague ASPossible to keep from RUNNing afoul of thE Rules! Sorry I can't help you. 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, grumble, sulk, sulk ... 
oh, coded message, starting the Enigma machine ...
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: It's already happening.
What you are describing is similar to what existed in the 80s, an entire industry. It was called Computer Aided Design (CAD). It was supposed to replace programmers then also.
Yet we are still here plodding away now.
modified 3-Mar-18 15:43pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
)