|
Hahahahahaha - I believe that! Made a long weekend seem like we spent it waiting for lights to change! 
Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer.
The End
|
|
|
|
|
You ought to be down here when it rains, wrecks everywhere.
Don't let your mind wander too far.
It's too small to be let out alone.
|
|
|
|
|
California is worse if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
|
No way - was pleased to get back to a normal place with normal traffic lights after 3 days in krazy Florida.
Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer.
The End
|
|
|
|
|
You want to really confuse 'em, change it for a roundabout... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
In Italy (we drive on the right side, you are from UK so you drive on the wrong - in facts the contrary of right is wrong) for some years roundabouts were to be traversed CLOCKWISE - which meant invading the opposite lane to access a roundabout.
Then the traffic laws changed to the intelligent way, roundabouts are to be traversed COUNTERCLOCKWISE so everybody stays on its own lane.
All right and good except that for 20 years elderly drivers took the roudabouts in the old ways and frontal collisions in roundabouts skyrocketed. Roundabouts have been the most dangerous road features in Italy for years and they still are in remote places where 90 years old drivers are common.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
OMG, I just booked a fly-drive vacation in Sicily 
|
|
|
|
|
Tips for driving in Italy:
1) At intersections, when you're clear to go, GO FOR FLOCK'S SAKE!! We aren't patient, at all;
2) Careful in roundabouts to the smartaxes who will enter even when you're already inside;
3) Careful in roundabouts to the smartaxes who will accelerate from 100 meters away to enter the nanosecond before you do;
4) Careful in roundabouts to the smartaxes don't know how to drive and will flank you from either side, or stop their car inside the roundabout and then shift to the rear gear because they missed their exit;
5) Pedestrians can and will jump out of nowhere with or without pedestrian crossings;
6) Don't honk if not absolutely necessary and you aren't ready to fight for dear life.
Bonus: cyclists without mandatory lights and mandatory reflective jackets are the norm. Especially when it's dark. Even worse if they are 80+ years old and can't go straight even on a ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ing rail.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was there 18 years ago. The drivers make Israeli drivers look good.
Never again!
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
According to some braniac, if you open an imagefile and edit it you are not permitted to save it as the file is locked.
That's an hour of headbanging I'm not getting back in a hurry!
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
If you mean in code, then yeah - in .NET at least that has been the case since V1.0: Image.FromFile Method (String) (System.Drawing)[^]
Quote: The file remains locked until the Image is disposed.
Simplest solution:
public static Image GetImage(string path)
{
using (Image im = Image.FromFile(path))
{
return new Bitmap(im);
}
}
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That's the solution I reached in the end.
But f'me, it's pretty damned stupid. If they're going to lock i, why not let you programatically open the image for r/w?
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
This is Microsoft we are talking about, and a boring bit of code.
They probably got the office junior to write it, and he got the code from SO... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: and he got the code from SO...
there's people making good money doing that... the hardest part is beating the job interview.
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Depressing, but true.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If you have the file still open, you should be able to overwrite it's contents. Of course, you do have to have opened it for writing. If you're trying to simultaneously open the file a second time for writing and change its contents.. well.. that way lies bugs, which is why you're not allowed to do such dumb things.
|
|
|
|
|
patbob wrote: If you have the file still open, you should be able to overwrite it's contents.
You can't if the file is locked.
So throw away your image instead of choosing "save as" 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
You think that's bad? (Yeah, it is.) PhotoShop refuses to write to my NAS. I have to store locally, then move the file.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: PhotoShop refuses to write to my NAS. I have to store locally, then move the file.
If your operating system has no problem writing to the NAS then but PhotoShop cannot... then I would suspect that PhotoShop is using its own SMB implementation. It may be attempting a SMBv1 connection[^] to your network storage device.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
That's rather horrible if that's the case. Why would any app even care? This should be completely abstracted away by the OS.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: This should be completely abstracted away by the OS.
Yeah. I completely agree.
Note that I am guessing here; but because most of the PhotoShop wielding graphics artists I've met were on Mac OSX[^] I am assuming that the PhotoShop SMB implementation is probably cross-platform.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: probably cross-platform
Obviously it failed.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: .. I would suspect that PhotoShop is using its own SMB implementation
Photoshop doesn't have an SMB implementation built in, that'd be silly. More likely, is that the NAS is using ext3 and it's SMB implementation isn't mapping all the SMB features to the foreign filesystem (or the foreign filesystem can't support them). If Photoshop is using one of those SMB features, then it might indeed faila write, not because Photoshop is deficient, but rather because the NAS is deficient. I've had to debug that exact issue before, twice, albeit not with Photoshop.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
