|
Thing is, I have Docker set up on a couple of QA Ubuntu servers, acting as replicas of prod environments, and they are brilliant. It makes testing so much easier because the image acts as a clone of prod, so I have a faithful reproduction that I can test against.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's time I stop being old then and look into it. Be one of the cool kids again.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
You never stopped being one of the cool kids. Me? Well, I never grew up. Never worry about having a second childhood; don't leave your first one.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Well I can't argue with this obviously extremely intelligent and highly inspired post. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Just read the first part of the first link, and I believe you just confirmed what I think. Docker for Windows requires Hyper-V correct?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Docker for Windows requires Hyper-V correct
Yup!
|
|
|
|
|
My condolences. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Its isn't a turnkey solution, but what you describe is essentially what Microsoft's Desktop App Converter[^] does -- it virtualizes the file system, registry, etc. for the desktop app that's being converted, and creates an installable windows UWP package. It probably won't keep that installed app from mucking with the main file system and registry once the installation is running on your machine, but at least all the registry keys and files related to the app itself are in a container.
I keep waiting for MS to deliver the community version of Visual Studio that way, so I don't have to permanently suffer the 750,000 registry entries it creates during installation on my personal machine, just to have it around for the odd time I want to use it.
Or.. would a sandbox product work? Something like SandboxIE maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
Contest marriage of country without a leading group (10)
Contest - race
marriage - m
country without a leading - nation - ation
group - racemation
modified 30-Nov-17 12:05pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well you stumped us all - I have no idea.
So what was the answer?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That's the echoing sound of us asking, what's the answer?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Should we, maybe, define an accepted dictionary for the CCC?
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I overheard a couple of people talking about this woman[^] today, and one of them called her a "Bucket O' Bats". Thought that was a rather interesting way of saying "Crazy Person".
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
One brick short of a full load.
Someone's therapist knows all about you!
|
|
|
|
|
It's so weird how people have names that betray their mission in life.
she did so to keep them safe and usher them onto heaven.
So says Amber Pasztor
I guess the 'z' caused a neural malfunction. 
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say she was a loon, but not as mad as a box of frogs.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely a kangaroo loose in the top paddock.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
She's definetely as out as a balcony.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we can disinfect her addled brain by warming her head in a microwave oven until the evil spirits steam out her eyeballs. Certainly worth a try.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
In between all these article I'm writing I'm also reading this fantastic book I stumbled upon.
It tells the story of Faraday's life and his great discoveries.
He is very inspiring because he always liked to do experiments himself to prove or disprove the science that was being discovered: he never took the answers for granted.
That is the core personality trait that the book cites that led to his great success.
Faraday, Maxwell, and the Electromagnetic Field: How Two Men Revolutionized Physics[^]
Really great book. Anyone else read it?
I highly recommend it if you're at all interested in Electronics, etc.
This is the guy who they named the measure of capacitance after (farads).
|
|
|
|
|
Just being pedantic:
does that mean physics worked differently before they came along?
or did they revolutionize the study of physics?
Installing Signature...
Do not switch off your computer.
|
|
|
|
|
There was no physics before they came along; it was all just magic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: it was all just magic
Still is: have you heard about magnets?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
