|
See the thread two down...
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree (fulsomely). This is a valid attempt at an article.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
The content looks fine but the links points to career/jobs site.
|
|
|
|
|
Why not assist the author by telling them the problem instead of posting here where others will blindly vote for nuking the author?
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
by seeing his profile page and the links in the article made me to suspect.So expected an advice from others on this.
modified 12-Nov-17 22:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Karthik Bangalore wrote: the links in the article made me to suspect
I think that the example is a choice from the current work he is doing. Probably better if he used CodeProject or another non-specific (that could be seen as spam) as the sample website however if may not cover all the types of querystrings he is trying to demonstrate.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
However the content is not sufficient to publish as an article. mostly the spam articles will be of lesser size.
|
|
|
|
|
I was only addressing the comment that you made within the context of your post. You're only now adding to it... Of course it's too short and poorly formated to get approved as an article.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Article is gone and user has some reports. I have taken a look and IMHO there were too many links (and for me some of them not really necessary).
Besides...
Quote: free basic version is available, but you must pay if you want the most advanced features.
I can understand that it can be taken as spam. I would probably have reported it too.
I would say... @Sean-Ewington should have a look and decide. Maybe some words with the author can do the job and if found "not guilty" then a wipe will be needed.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Was this meant for myself or @Karthik Bangalore?
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Neither nor...
It was meant for the rest that might read the thread.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No to the article, I'll let the author stay for now
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, let's be honest - you would, even if you were! 
And we get a lot of spammers, most of which will say anything to post their garbage.
The member that reported you was prompted by the automated system, and has a lot of experience in spotting spam while you joined today and your first post looks like spam to both the automated system and an experienced member. Which one do you think we will believe?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I just was looking for feedback for my first open source project (like in that other community where they suggested to add an Installer for example).
If the wish for opinions makes one a spammer over here.. Ok, then rule out the "dis" in my foregoing post.
|
|
|
|
|
Get off your high horse, and see it from our point of view for a moment!
I can't see exactly what you posted: the automated detector didn't like it, and an experienced member agreed, so it was deleted and nobody else can read it and tell.
The "wish for opinions" doesn't make you a spammer, but it's possible that the way you asked did. If your post was along the lines of "I wrote this, look at it, it's great!" then yes, it probably looks more like spam than anything else.
If it was a detailed description of the project, what it does, how it works, how it came to be the way it is, and a request for comments, then it probably should have got through as an article - there are a huge number of articles just like that here already: Site Map, Articles[^]
Perhaps if you rephrase the way you asked, it might get through? I dunno - I have no idea what you originally wrote!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I got your point.
(FYI: I posted a link to the project's homepage and asked something like "Do you think this is an useful tool?")
Let's see, maybe I can re-try with providing some more information respectively a more detailled hint to what I am actually looking / asking for.
.. if I would still be allowed to? Or is my account now stigmatized as "spam account" and therefore banned for new posts? Okok, I will just try later on.
Thanks for your feedback btw! Even if it was not related to my project itself, you gave me some useful tips which I will take into account in the future when there is a "wish for opinions" coming up (no kidding)
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
sebdotnet wrote: is my account now stigmatized as "spam account" and therefore banned for new posts?
The ways of the Spam Detector are not for us mere mortal minds: it's heuristic, and has been know to take a dislike to individuals before...
But no post is deleted automatically: everything the detector picks up goes to a queue for a human moderator to review and pass or reject for publication. (It's a necessary evil - you would not believe the amount of spam we got before it was introduced.)
So far, your account is still open - though it has "spammer tags" associated with it, those will fade with time - so posting is still open and allowed.
Why not write up the project as an article: Submit a new Article[^] - that way you can get feedback and educate people!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: If your post was along the lines of "I wrote this, look at it, it's great!" then yes, it probably looks more like spam than anything else.
It wasn't even that much, was asked (perhaps unintentionally) more in the mode of "I found this project over here, do you guys thinks it's worthwhile using?" It smelled spammy, I looked, I saw it was published by the user, so I called it as I saw it -- trying to drive traffic to his project.
|
|
|
|
|
In which case I think you made exactly the right call - but in this case it was probably a case of the OP "posting first and thinking later".
Give him another chance and keep an eye on him?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
