|
Have you tried FFMPEG? I was using it last night to trim the beginnings and ends off some MP4s and it was fast and easy. I put the command line into a BAT file and drag the videos onto that. I manually tweak the command line as necessary for start and duration, etc.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't - thanks! Something else to try 
|
|
|
|
|
Given that so many 'tools' are nothing more than a front-end for either ffmpeg or mencoder, yours is the suggestion I'd have made. 
|
|
|
|
|
Interestingly I went down this road about a year ago. My requirements were a bit more wide ranging from WebEx screen capture sessions all the way up to crop and chopping clips from GoPro and my Sony HD camcorder.
I ultimately decided on Cyberlink PowerDirector. It's overkill for simple crop and chop clips. Does lean a bit more toward hobbyist/professional end of the spectrum. But I found it balanced in codec abilities, ease, and performance. It has a 7 day free trial. Also handy at remastering and producing the final cuts into multiple formats from H.264 to wmv to mobile friendly formats.
Honestly, I'm not sure you can do chop/cut editing on the fly unless your source and final production are raw uncompressed formats. Compressed formats require recompilation. To use a programmer like comparison, If you have a CSV file with 5 million rows in a zip file (because no one has ever had that happen  ), go in and delete 500k rows from the end of the file, it still requires the file to be rezipped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This has made my morning for some reason. Love this stuff and it is so relevant, imo.
Code included in the video. I can say I have compiled and ran TensorFlow on ubuntu, then made a clonezilla of the build on my laptop.
Capsule Networks: An Improvement to Convolutional Networks
Capsule Networks: An Improvement to Convolutional Networks - YouTube[^]
|
|
|
|
|
What's with the hairdoo? I thought Halloween was over. 
Otherwise, interesting video!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. makes me want to reimage my laptop to play around with this but I would need to make an another clonezilla image of my current OS. I was chosen to be a STEM mentor for a student on my son's high school FIRST robotics team on this project competition [^]
I am wondering if we can use this as the student is, and some of you on CP might remember way back as this was my interest to at one time, predicting and simulating NFL games. Not exactly the "question of tomorrow" but it could use some tech from tomorrow. hhmmmm.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are selling your own software and get a request for a quote from a software distributor for a license for a single customer, do you play along or decline? I've been selling directly to the users of my software in the vast majority in the past but did sell a few licenses via distributors. But I didn't see any benefit of doing so in exchange for the expected discount... So today I declined another RFQ from a distributor.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
For a single licence? Probably the same as you - a polite decline, with a comment that if they want to set up a licensing agreement with targets and discount levels, you'll be happy to see what they propose.
Distros can be useful - they can reach into customers you haven't met or can't meet, and provided they make a good profit so can you!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Holy man's book takes a short time to devour - then it's gone. (9)
[edit]
Someone (who wishes to remain anonymous for now) has got this, but pointed out a slight issue with the tense. It didn't hinder them though, but perhaps the clue might be better as:
Holy man's book takes a short time to devour and get rid of (9)
if that makes it easier...
[/edit]
This being my first one here, I don’t think this is hard – don’t want you getting stuck and thinking “The new guy doesn’t know what he’s doing!” – but I discovered something while thinking of different puzzles: it’s hard to judge the level of difficulty when working backwards from the answer. They all look easy - but of course most problems do once you know how to solve them.
So here are a few bonus ones – no prizes for these, but I’d be interested to know if they’re as easy as I think they are (I’m sure the first one is!):
1. A bid to oust the President? (3, 2, 5)
2. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? It's a troll! (7)
3. Build a fake type (9)
4. Music an extreme revelation (8)
modified 2-Nov-17 6:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
Difficulty is in the eye of the solver. I've posted clues that I'd worried were far too easy and people have struggled. I've posted clues that I thought were absolutely fiendish and someone's posted the correct answer within a couple of minutes.
I'm sure that many of us will have have had the experience where we've gazed at a crossword for half an hour, written in two answers and given up, only to pick it up the next day and polish it off in a few minutes.
One thing that can be relied on with absolute certainty in the CCC OTD is that whenever the setter declares a clue to be easy, people struggle with it.
It should be noted, by the way, that we can't use the T-word round here.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - as I say, it's really hard to judge when you know the answer already. Solutions to any problem are nearly always obvious in retrospect.
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: we can't use the T-word round here
Trumpet?
Transgender?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Trumpet?
Transgender?
No, not those! Oh, God! You're going to make me say it ... T***derbirds!
To me, it was a rather innovative if somewhat repetitive bit of television but to others it was lazy, ill-considered and pushed the boundaries of plausibility way too far. Let's not discuss it any further or before we know it certain people will be calling each other a snow-globe or a librarian or something and threatening to shoot each other in the faeces or whatever it is that they do. I've said too much already, if there's going to be any further discussion on this matter, let's move it to The Dopebox ...
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm thinking "eliminate" but it would still have a tense issue with devour.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
You're right.
That was pointed out too - ok, slightly careless, but I don't think it stops anyone getting it. You did.
You win.
I will do better next time (if...)
Now get the other ones! They're easy!
|
|
|
|
|
They're not easy now that you've said that they are!
I'm certainly struggling with "Is it a bird ..."
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: 3. Build a fake type (9)
Comic Sans 
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricate ?
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stupid me - I couldn't think how to correct the clue, and all I had to do was change "takes" to "took"... <sigh> next time.... if... I'm clearly not at my sharpest in the morning's...
|
|
|
|
|
Devour would still be synonymous with "eat" rather than "ate", I'd have thought ...
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I'm going for a siesta!
But.. you can us "ate" in the past tense. It may not be technically correct, but people do:
"I ate a banana yesterday"
|
|
|
|
|
"I ate a banana yesterday" would be correct, "I devour a banana yesterday", on the other hand ...
Maybe "consumed" would be a better route.
Either way, a siesta sounds like a damned fine idea - I just need to run it by the boss 
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
