|
No really... 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I know that since the days of 8 bit computers. Never get an interpreter to do a compiler's job. This kept me from being contaminated with BASIC and later it saved me from PHP or JavaScript.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
Javascript's been JIT compiled like C#/Java for a while now.
You need a new excuse to avoid it. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: Javascript's been JIT compiled like C#/Java for a while now.
The poor man's version, at best. It still is slow as hell and only notices that it's dead when it hits the line with the error, like all interpreters.
What do I need excuses for? Anyone who uses such a contraption for any serious work has greater problems than me not liking it.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Don't know why, but when I posted some replies to some posts in the lounge, the messages went straight for spam review. It did not happen before.
I understand the need for spam reviews but didn't think I would be the "marked man"
Can someone tell me what it this about?
Thanks
I am not the one who knocks. I never knock.
In fact, I hate knocking. Just barge in will'Ya?
|
|
|
|
|
We get a lot of spam coming in on the site, so we have a spam filter that catches anything it's "learned" might be spam. Fortunately the community is pretty quick to approve or disapprove of these things so you won't be in the filter long. You're not a marked man 
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I am having the same "issue" and believe it stems from a disgruntled reader marking one of my responses as spam (it was reversed, btw) and since then everything I post or reply goes to the spam review queue.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you get notified that one of your posts have been marked as spam by a reader. Only if you post a new message that gets caught automatically in the filter.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. You both deserve that, but don't worry. look at my answer to the OP below.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
Good news. You have made enough points in the last days to get the privilege 'Bypass spam checks when posting content'. Obviously you are trustworthy enough now. 
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: We get a lot of spam coming in on the site, so we have a spam filter that catches anything it's "learned" might be spam. Fortunately the community is pretty quick to approve or disapprove of these things so you won't be in the filter long. You're not a marked man
More correctly, everyone(*) is a marked man until proven unmarked.
(* With apologies for gender incorrectness)
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
That's a relief.
I am not the one who knocks. I never knock.
In fact, I hate knocking. Just barge in will'Ya?
|
|
|
|
|
You deserve that. The site's rules want it so.
Don't worry, it will be over quickly. As you gain reputation points, you also will be trusted with more privileges.
Look here: GKP1992 - Professional Profile[^] and select the tab 'Privileges'.
These are your privileges. You will not have a green check mark at 'Bypass spam checks when posting content' yet and you just need to fulfill at least one of the shown categories. In this case that would be silver in almost anything at all.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the explanation. I became regular on CP very recently, explains the noobiness  .
I am not the one who knocks. I never knock.
In fact, I hate knocking. Just barge in will'Ya?
|
|
|
|
|
GKP1992 wrote: Can someone tell me what it this about?
<Gives The Look> YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DID!!! </Gives The Look> 
On the other hand, you have different fingers. - Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
It happens now and then - especially this close to a full moon.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Can a religious magician pull a rabbi out of his hat?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
can a wildling magi pull a rabid out of his skull cap?
Sin tack
the any key okay
|
|
|
|
|
That hat hold the (Dalai) Lama not the Rabbi
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you are pastor point of no return.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, although he still seems to be pretty popeular.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
He seems to have reached a reverendly status.
|
|
|
|
|
A plateau, nun of us are likely to reach.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
The nirvana of some people proclaiming they're beyond such heights.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
