|
A visit from the Ethics Committee, and immediate withdrawal of your funding.
Damn. Damn, damn, damn...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
My god, at this hour already in such a state !
|
|
|
|
|
Google translation is the butt of god.
|
|
|
|
|
unchewable steak, nooooo! (which btw was the ethics violation.)
Sin tack
the any key okay
modified 4-Aug-17 15:49pm.
|
|
|
|
|
RubberSteak (C)(TM)
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know, but, it's going to need a tentacularium, not a barn, and I suspect milking it will be an udder disaster.
«Differences between Big-Endians, who broke eggs at the larger end, and Little-Endians gave rise to six rebellions: one Emperor lost his life, another his crown. The Lilliputian religion says an egg should be broken on the convenient end, which is now interpreted by the Lilliputians as the smaller end. Big-Endians gained favor in Blefuscu.» J. Swift, 'Gulliver's Travels,' 1726CE
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is udderly ridiculous, and very fishy to boot.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I kept visualizing the offspring able to milk itself.
I blame you for that.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I see what I consider improper usage of the word "not" in a lot of writing these days, especially in news articles.
In the following, what do you think is more correct, grammatically speaking?
To say
a) "I'm going to not hit him."
or
b) "I'm not going to hit him."
I think (b) is correct. The first, (a) is a split infinitive and seems to imply you're going to do something else. Yet I see writing examples similar to (a) all over the place these days. Where did these people learn grammar?
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Just use Dutch: Ik ga hem niet slaan. 
|
|
|
|
|
...or German: Ich bin schlagen sie nicht!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Your German is impeccable !
|
|
|
|
|
I lived in München for six years and learned High German (Hochdeutsch) at a Swiss language school taught by a Venezuelan teacher (who spoke no English)!
Needless to say, I didn't understand half of what the locals said since they all spoke Bayerisch!
For Example:
- "I mog Bier!"
...instead of...
- "Ich möchte ein Bier, bitte!"
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Though I disagree with your reasoning, B is better for that particular sample set.
And bear in mind that I have no idea what a split infinitive is.
I have found that many people put the word "only" too early in many sentences.
Compare:
Only I will hit him
I will only hit him.
I will hit only him.
On the other hand...
God only knows.
Only God knows.
|
|
|
|
|
...and then there is inflection; the way you say something.
For example:
- "This is a fine country we live in!"
Depending upon how you say it it can mean the exact opposite of another way of saying the same words!
Whoever said English was an easy language?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Are to talking to me?[^]
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I hold sarcasm as one of Britain's greatest inventions.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
English was not a language, its a mix of German, French, Spanish, Italin, Latin, Flemish...it was not designed it happended...
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: split in·fin·i·tive
noun
a construction consisting of an infinitive with an adverb or other word inserted between to and the verb, e.g., she seems to really like it.
Basically, an infinitive is the "whole word" or the basic form of the word, so "to run", "to sing", "to bleat", "to see" --- the "to" is part of the word. Consequently, putting a word between "to" and "run" such as "to not run" splits the infinitive and confuses the meaning.
In each of your "only", the meaning is clear; "Only" applies to the word immediately following. Unless it doesn't as when there's a comma, in which case it applies to the preceding word.
God only knows.
God, only, knows.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
TheGreatAndPowerfulOz wrote: the "to" is part of the word
Is not.
|
|
|
|
|
is to!
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
