|
I would hold on a mo Sean. Let's get it clarified that this article is plagiarized first - I'm not so sure it is.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
This thread has risen over anything that can be used to discuss.
Are you now sure, or unsure?
|
|
|
|
|
Go ahead, see Jochen's message below.
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-Ewingtonn ,I have send you mail,Today i chat with Mr Kelly Martens and asked permission to use the function and also in article to add his name and link to his original blog post,Kindly check your mail and if all fine kindly reopen the closed article.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you think this is plagiarized? The only versions of this I see are both by the same user (he posted on C-Sharp Corner and in Technet). He regularly posts versions of the same article in multiple locations.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
The message where Tim explained his concerns in detail is gone with the article..
Anyways, the biggest discussion point was the rather large chunk of code he grabbed from here[^]
He seemingly has grabbed a lot of the code to download from there, and that's just rewrapping an old gift.
|
|
|
|
|
I see that Syed linked out to that page in his list of references.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
He added the link after Tino's message.
But it still does not match the requirements:
- Even with the link there is no indication what has been copied.
- There may be a license discrepance (article is CPOL but the used source may have a different license). He should have asked the author.
- The source code (downloads and browse) does not contain a reference.
- Most of the article code is located in one file which is completely based on the source from Kelly's Chronicles.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification works, Jochen!
|
|
|
|
|
Nevermind - I managed to see where he's doing the repackaging. Very naughty.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Dear All,
@Sean-Ewington ,I have send you mail,Today i chat with Mr Kelly Martens and asked permission to use the function and also in article to add his name and link to his original blog post,Kindly check your mail and if all fine kindly reopen the closed article.
Thank you all for your comments.let me clear something here.
1) The article which is in discussion was been initially published during 2014.it was the time when i start writing articles.
2).The idea of the article is to read and write text from the external program without modifying the source code.
3) For this concept i search and found few articles which is related to that and using that i have made a sample which is some what advance version for reading and writing text from external programs.
4) When i read Kelly's Chronicles article all his background process few functions was related to my work and used and extended that to make with live sample.
5) In Kelly's Chronicles link he has mentioned as " I won’t be able to use these concepts at work yet but will once we upgrade our framework version. Hope it helps someone."Even kelly's Chronicles point is the source code is useful for some for implementing in their project and also i have developed this article not for own use ,I made that for the community.
6) I have added kelly's Chronicles name and link as reference in my article.
7) The article is closed now,I know well as Plagiarized article should be deleted,I respect that but the article is not exactly plagiarized ,as i have presented the reference links and my demo application is entirely different from others and it contains few functions which will be as common function method for reading and writing text from and to external programs.
I just want to clarify what it has and never mind even if its deleted as the article is very old I respect Plagiarized article should be deleted.
modified 26-Apr-17 0:21am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
... but the Article is closed now 
modified 25-Apr-17 6:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spamming in the Lounge - obfuscated with Korean characters:
KierstenMarc16 - Professional Profile[^]
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
modified 25-Apr-17 4:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 13150070 - Professional Profile[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 25-Apr-17 4:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer: Stevenro - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Latest Messages[^]
No links (yet), but both visible messages are in the "free tools" forum, and are recommending a product which starts at $24.70. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 25-Apr-17 1:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer: Alicjakr - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Latest Messages[^]
Joined yesterday, and posted a reply to a message from 2015 with a link to his "advertising management software".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 25-Apr-17 2:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
Relatiegeschenken Nederland - Professional Profile[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 24-Apr-17 15:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Wait and kill the payload provider as well?
I know that RyanDev can be a bit PITA sometimes, but nuking him... is it not a bit too much? 
P.S. Joke explanation... he is the one who answered the question
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 25-Apr-17 2:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: I think the question is clear and valid to ask.
Agreed. Which is why the first time he asked, he got an answer. The answer isn't going to change just because he reposted the same question over and over. How many times do you think we should answer the exact same questions? Look at how many time we get the same copy/paste answer to "Why do I get a null reference exception" questions. it's the same answer over and over.
Speed of sound - 1100 ft/sec
Speed of light - 186,000 mi/sec
Speed of stupid - instantaneous.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
