|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: VBA script in Excel Awesome. You can do all kinds of fun stuff. And, it's easy because you can record half of it usually.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you get therapy for this? You should write a blog about your painful experience, and other snowflakes can follow you.
|
|
|
|
|
Most doctors shake their head, and apologize for not being able to help me "because the hurt goes too deep".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sensing a pattern here...does JSOP dislike VB?
Variety is the spice of life! Yesterday for me was a mix of VB.Net, VBS, C#, JavaScript and CSS and I feel fine.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
It's the habanero chili of programming,
not the very hottest (the carolina reaper), but not far off
can be taken taken in small doses to excite the palette (or to show off)
but in large quantities will incinerate your mouth going in and basically de-ring you coming out.
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
Super, super far off from a Carolina Reaper.
One makes pale people cry a little. The other is weapons grade.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: es JSOP dislike VB? No no no!
It's the love of his life!
It's VBA that's the problem, because it's a watered-down perversion of his beloved!
Please, cheer him up by sending all your questions about VB (NOT VBA!) to him!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
On my gravestone, I want "He was an evil b@st@rd!"
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
As I always say, it's not the tool that is used that's the problem, it's usually the tool that uses it.
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
That the clever method you made, isn't conforming with the MSDN documentation and therefore might be dependent on a bug.
What do you do?
- Fix the (at the moment nonexistent) problem despite taking several days, just to make sure a nasty bug doesn't appear whenever MS changes their method, which they might never do.
- Or do you add a comment to the method in question stating what the fix is if it's ever needed.
- Other.
|
|
|
|
|
In a idilliac situation point 1. Since I'm always overworked and underpaid, point 2.
CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"Go ahead, make my day"
|
|
|
|
|
The answer would depending on many things like:
- If MS fixes their bug, would our bug immediately be visible, and if so, how severe would its impact be?
- Would it affect the core functionality of whatever product/system it's part of?
- Would it lead to revenue loss?
- Would this have a domino effect of some sort?
- How difficult is it to fix the bug at our end?
No matter what, I'd most certainly log it as a defect so that it could be tracked formally. And based on the answers to the questions above, the bug might have an appropriate priority anywhere from "Sometime before Christmas" to "MUST BE DONE YESTERDAY!"
All said, if the said code could be easily re-written or a fix could be made available relatively painlessly, I'd fix it up without putting it off.
|
|
|
|
|
You can't deploy code to production that requires special instructions. "In case of fire, pull handle, kiss ass goodbye".
I would try to use another way, if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Other: Pretend I haven't noticed anything and hope that I'm far gone by the time it gets to be an issue...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Are you by any chance working as a consultant?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope - If I were, I wouldn't do it that way. As a consultant you have to bill as many hours as humanly possible so in that case, I would definitely investigate the problem... Slowly... Very slowly...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
So you're implementing methods before reading the documentation?
How do you fully know how/when/what it does and may not do then?
At least a skim of the headings/parameters/return/exceptions is worthwhile, MSDN docs are not bad and they will note special info in there as well.
I mean, if you find a strange substance do you taste it before checking the label to see if its poisonous?
"Mmmm looks like cookies, yum <crunch crunch="">, wonder what they are called ... Rat-X!!! Yikes!!!"
A bit later from the wife, "Sorry dear, put the rat bait in the cupboard next to the snack foods... dear? ... are you listening to me? ... dear?"
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: "Mmmm looks like cookies, yum <crunch crunch>, wonder what they are called ... Rat-X!!! Yikes!!!" If I had a penny for every time I'd done that...
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Lopatir wrote: "Mmmm looks like cookies, yum <crunch crunch>, wonder what they are called ... Rat-X!!! Yikes!!!" If I had a penny for every time I'd done that...
Eating pennies also not such a good idea.
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
Go get a latte and fuggedaboudit!
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
|
certainly
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I might need some help here.
I'm recording some music on computer. As long as I use clean instruments (song, acoustic guitar, clean electric guitar, drums, ...) everything is fine, but from the moment I turn on my distortion, it sounds like a dentist drill shoved up my brain.
I've tried many, many things and I ruled out some issues already:
* It's not my Marshall (MG 100 HDFX)
* It's not the pedals themselves (Boss GT-3)
* It's not the guitar (Gibson Studio +)
* It's not my wireless guitar system, tried with a cable as well
I'm thinking the issue is with the sound device (Roland UA-55), but there I tried almost everything I could set: using autosense, playing mono instead of stereo, setting all the switches on/off.
It's not the laptop I think, because the sound is plugged in/out via the sound device in/out, not the laptop. Besides, It's an expensive piece of equipment, I would think it would just "work".
I've searched google, but very little comes up. Except that recording overdrive/distortion can be "tricky" business, yet my friend uses a pod device and never had any issues.
If all else fails I can always turn to my irig, which should still work (it's emulated on the laptop), but frankly this just has to work. (and the Marshall distortion is just great, I'd like to use that one)
Anyone any experience with this? what could the problem be?
Many thanks for any tips on resolving my issue.
[update]
Luckily for me the irig through my iPad works! Clean as a wistle. (Well, "clean" as in, not sounding like the dentist drill mentioned above). Still I'll try to resolve the issue with the pedals/amp.
[/update]
modified 2-Feb-17 8:06am.
|
|
|
|