|
Latest Messages[^]
He has a new one.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Note that although the 26 messages say "Message Removed", they are in fact not removed.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
If I am not wrong you see them due to your badge. But not all public can see them
At least the spam is not visible in the message list.
modified 2-Dec-16 11:41am.
|
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure you are wrong. If I log out from CP, I can still see the messages. There is no spam in them, just a number of emojis, but the messages are there. The text is different from the one message that has actually been 'removed'.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. The spammer has actually typed "Message Removed" as the title of his messages. The content is variations of "Message removed..." with various emoticons. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
There is people for eveything... :S
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting a link in a year old question. Member 11923267[^].
modified 27-Nov-16 12:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Gentleman's Vegetables" no longer workie? This guy has a miracle fix: Member 12871495 - Professional Profile[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 2-Dec-16 12:57pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Don't blindly report. I've put this here for discussion.
Code Review Checklist and Guidelines for C# Developers[^]
It certainly isn't an article per se. To me it seems like a collection of links. Whilst the content is valid (even though there are too many links in it for my taste) I'd consider it a Reference, not an article.
@sean-ewington Opinion on that?
modified 27-Nov-16 12:32pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quite right. A reference. One of the few, I imagine. Fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
