|
And that is the point... you are modifying the "raw" text
Please click on "edit" my first message, and pay attention to what I wrote, don't do any correction, just copy my full message, paste it in notepad and see the differences between that and what gets posted in the forum
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but whatever I post from your original message gives me the same two results. But in this case I don't get the <pre> tags. I assume I must still be missing something from your original message.
Quote: Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'
Quote: Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'
|
|
|
|
|
Have you done what I am saying?
Click "edit" in my original message, select all text, copy and paste in notepad and then compare my text with my output.
I have checked the content of your message and I can't understand where the difference is.
The message I wrote starting all this is:
Deploy ASP DotNet Core Web Applications on Ubuntu Linux (AWS EC2) behind Apache Server - Minor Improvement[^]
try to edit there and delete the carriage return before the end tag of blockquote...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have post some screenshots, see message below
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure I fully understand what you're doing here. You wrote:
writing
<blockquote class="quote"><div class="op">Quote:</div>Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'
</blockquote>
...
and "but writing"
<blockquote class="quote"><div class="op">Quote:</div>Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
<pre>sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'</blockquote></pre>
messes things up.
It *should* mess things up because you have your closing PRE and BLOCKQUOTE tags around the wrong way, meaning the ending BLOCKQUOTE will be HTML encoded, so the starting tag won't be closed.
I think I need more info.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
As I said to Richard...
Just edit my message and pay attention what I wrote versus what is the result
or even better... copy my very first snippet
<blockquote class="quote"><div class="op">Quote:</div>Following are the commands to install dotnet from the article in the link above for Ubuntu 16.04:
sudo sh -c 'echo "deb [arch=amd64] https://apt-mo.trafficmanager.net/repos/dotnet-release/ xenial main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dotnetdev.list'
</blockquote>
and do it yourself...
first time paste just as it is (logically without encoding the HTML tags)
second time paste it and then delete the carriage return before the closing tag < /blockquote > bringing it to the previous line behind "dotnetdev.list'"
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have posted some screenshots, have a look below
BTW... all started with FireFox at work and now I am using IE 11 at home. Same effect
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Could you have a look to the screenshots?
I am still curious if I was really doing something wrong or it is repeatable.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Screenshots here[^]
1) Message in the article OK
2) Message in the article messed
3) My original post here part 2 (part 1 is the one working fine, so I just deleted it for the screenshot, afterwards I aborted the edition)
4) My original post here part 3
To reproduce it you have to paste my snippet with the option "Use Markdown formatting" active
I suppose it is connected to the automatic snippet format (markdown) when using the indention. It takes the ending /blockquote as part of the code and then there is no "official" closing tag for the quote. Putting the tag in other line or deleting the 4 empty spaces before the bash command solves it.
But still... I find weird, that the editor brings additional "pre" tags without closing them on its own. See pic 3
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 19-Oct-16 18:08pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is you have the "Use Markdown formatting" checked.
Markdown and HTML just make life horrible. There are a hundred markdown interpreters. none of them do what you think they should. So I've started writing my own and then just got depressed about it all.
So...sorry. Them's the breaks with Markdown. It's a savage untamed beast.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I already have figured out that it was due to markdown, because Richard had no issues at all.
Thanks for confirmation.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The site keep showing me to confirm email, I confirmed many times by clicking on the provided link inside email, now and before months ago. But it keep shows that.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH A#@RFJ\c^JPL>;"[, /|+&WLEZGc
AFXc!L<br />
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_ADEPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[MUKs$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please send me a confirmation email you received? chris at codeproject.com.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have forwarded the email.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH A#@RFJ\c^JPL>;"[, /|+&WLEZGc
AFXc!L<br />
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_ADEPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[MUKs$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia> -----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing before the opening table tag in my gratuitous Eye Roll[^]; but an amount of white space equal to several dozen lines is being shown before the intended content. The same thing happens when it's appended to another message.[^]
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
1. Fixed.
2. You have way, WAY too much spare time.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to always cut off the first two characters of what you're pasting.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Which version of IE are you using?
(and I know it's IE because I spent way too long trying to track that issue down. I guess I didn't crack it)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When I try to tidy the removed spam in the lounge, I just get
Items that need attention:
The message cannot be replied to or modified
I used to be able to dump the detritus, once the community had killed it's content.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: used to be able to dump the detritus
As in: edit and remove the bad content?
No need to: only admins and protectors can see the content.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
As in delete the message so the forum isn't full of "Message automatically removed" paging everything else off the screen. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: No need to: only admins and protectors can see the content.
Open a new window and browse logged off  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you point me to a message you're trying to remove?
We've refactored the permissions system a little to make things more consistent. Checks are now (shockingly!) all done at the same place. I know - crazy talk. It may be that permissions have been, ahem, adjusted.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There's one in the Lounge right now: The Lounge[^] - I just tried and got:
Quote: Delete a Message
Items that need attention:
The message cannot be replied to or modified
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
took longer in aggregate because it was done by abusing for finer layout control; but even there v 1.0 took less than an hour and I've done occasional tweaks since then to smooth the eruption.