|
Again, the most selective facts from you. One example: the banking crisis was precipitated by the first Clinton who came up with the idea that if you gave loans to people who could not pay them back, it would help them. The crisis built throughout Clinton's 8 years. When Bush came in, he tried to stop what was going on with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to no avail - Chris Todd and Barney Frank blocked every single attempt to stop what was going on.
Saying it was Bush's fault - jeesh. Just keep digging.
As for your "religious right" blah, blah, blah, the same brush slings to your side as well.
Koch Brothers vs. Soros, and on it goes. Your blind with your bigotry.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: e first Clinton who came up with the idea that if you gave loans to people who could not pay them back, i
WRONG!
It was to make loans easier - but predatory loans were still illegal. That, of course, assumes that someone in government was watching. During the Shrub's tenure, money was piling in to the big banks and so nothing was done. Then they packaged them, sold the bundled junk to get more money to do it again: a pyramid scheme allowed by the anti-government-regulation crowd. Note, too, that the loans were made by local mortgage brokers (not Wall Street, but Main Street, despite the sloganism). They talked people into loans they should make and couldn't maintain. That was never part of any law.
Quote: Often, banks would offload this risk to insurance companies or other counterparties through credit default swaps, making their actual risk exposures extremely difficult for investors and creditors to discern.[35]
from Wikipedia lookup of Fannie May - scroll down to "Mortgage Chrisis from Late 2007"
Quote: It could have been prevented, except:
In the Wiki paragraph above that cited above, you'll notice how Bush opposed legislation that was designed to fix a problem:
Quote: "The regulatory regime envisioned by H.R. 1461 is considerably weaker than that which governs other large, complex financial institutions."
a problem, in his anti-regulatory mindset, should not be fixed.
We paid the price. Wall Street and Main Street brokers kept the money.
As for my gripe with the religious right? I don't follow their faith and I'd consider using some second amendment rights to protect my first amendment rights. Remember the hell they created with prohibition of alcohol? They're just an American version of the Taliban.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
DoD answers to Congress (or at least it should).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
United States Department of Defense - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[^]
If we can trust Wikipedia... the DOD is an executive branch department controlled directly by the Secretary of Defense (an appointed cabinet level position) who answers directly to the president.
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
But only congress can declare war and allocate money for defense, so ultimately, the DoD answers to congress.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Surely any company that bits for a contract would expect to recruit staff if required after they win the contract, not have it all in place for the bid unless it can be absorbed by current staffing levels?
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, but our MoD wouldn't accept an offer from an "economically disadvantaged" company. They require documentation of longevity/tenure, proof of assets, and evidence that sufficient resources can be applied to the contract.
It's the MoD, not the guy down the road who runs the post office and needs a spreadsheet app. You have to prove that you can deliver and that you'll still be around to fix it, n years down the line.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Officially a small business setaside, with all the box ticks that charlieg listed acting as boosters in the selection process. From what it sounds the company is a parasite that will effectively skim off a passthrough for administering as many of JSOPs coworkers as they end up hiring when taking over. The company in question was competing to administer the existing workforce after takeover not to provide a new one. 
And yeah it's not uncommon for positions where the DoD has contractors running onsite operations for it. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot to mention that we can't even get to the company web site from work...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I've already GOTTEN half a dozen headhunters contacting me letting me know that the position I currently hold is available.
That is bizarre 
|
|
|
|
|
...and a completely unnecessary abuse of the English language.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Suck it, Maunder.
BTW, is CP hiring?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
With an attitude like that I'm almost certain either you won't be receiving a message from @chris-maunder saying that you've GOTTEN the job, or that you have successfully completed the interview post and GOTTEN an offer as Sean's minion and full time mankini cleaner. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
you forgot the italic tag.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: BTW, is CP hiring?
I couldn't imagine a Texan moving to Toronto (as winter's about to start) and liking it.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I'm probably going to switch over from my typical cheery, sensitive demeanor, to someone that is more surly, short-tempered, and just plain rude.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
A few decades ago something similar happened during the commissioning of the (then) new Denver airport. They had a bid from a competent company to develop the software for the baggage handling system, but decided to give the contract to another, utterly inexperienced company to satisfy affirmative action requirements. Why not? Programming is just typing and any moron can do it, not so? 
The end result: The opening of the airport was severely delayed, by more than a year as far as I remember, and in the end they had to go back and appoint the competent company, who saw them coming and made them pay through their noses, because getting the baggage system to work was now a crisis. I love this story!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
This story raised a little bit my faith in the Universe!
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: I love this story!
I don't think it's exactly true. 
http://calleam.com/WTPF/wp-content/uploads/articles/DIABaggage.pdf[^]
The company hired to create the baggage system was BAE Systems - a huge multinational corporation of over 80,000 employees - not an affirmative action charity case.
The problems at DIA were way more than software and the ultimate "solution" was not hiring a competent software company - they reverted to a "manual" system that still runs today.
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! I told the story the way it was told to me.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
This is the way government eventually fails.
New guy: "Hello, I'm new here."
Incumbent: "Great, this is the way we run things, as it was relayed to me."
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Traditionally, I've been a Linux/Shell/Bash disliker. I had completely grown up on Windows. The last thing I loved on a black screen was DOS. Though I still use Windows Command prompt, and those techie C# Console tools I write.
The windows chain of tools & utils has been so productive with drag n drops,click-clucks.
Now unfortunately I'd been often forced to look into Linux
I had suffered enough because of my Linux-ignorance, losing some of our valuable customers.
(Yes we should ideally hire a Linux admin, we have that in the To-Do for an year.)
Linux environment, I simply couldn't take it. It brings so much fatigue to the brain if I'm continuously traversing like, Okay to do this, do that. To do that, install this. to install this, install that. For that, type this. And finally I realize, what I have is a bare naked system. And every damn thing has to be manually set up. How unproductive this is.
It's a total fatigue. May be it's because I've identified myself too much with windows and nothing else. I don't know.
Now I'm at a point to give it a try again. I believe I can Sit down and learn all those things that I see on a dry linux Book. I believe I can still do with so much eye sore.
The question is, is that any worth? Or the linux world is by any chance moving towards GUI, click-cluck direction. I've seen ubuntu desktops and got some sigh of relief- okay, may be it's time we learn some linux stuff! (with mouse)
but what I'm talking about is Server. you think, Linux _SERVER_ . Is this always going to need Shell commands expertise. Will there be something like remote-desktop, Click to deploy etc coming up.
If Linux is just going to stay with Shell prompt and commands, and nothing new coming up, then I should give a try again. this never ending story...
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look I think you maybe surprised, its moved along a lot since you last used it in, I would guess the early 1990's.
Start with the Ubuntu desktop distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. but I'm asking about Server editions.
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Vunic wrote: If Linux is just going to stay with Shell prompt and commands, and nothing new coming up, then I should give a try again. this never ending story...
Well... I work for a company quite uptodate and innovating (technologically speaking) and I have to do with Linux Console servers and some web based apps that helps the other people, but through console I can do more things and even some tricks that are not possible using the click-tools.
I started with linux around 18 months ago and I am far from being an expert, that's why I am very careful and don't do things where I am not sure about the result... but it is not bad as I thought before starting and have already built some things where people working there longer have told "nice"
In my opinion... interfaces as Ubuntu are fine for private users, but I don't think is going to get into Server side so fast, they still need a lot console to be configured, changed, secured and other staff.
If that is enough for you to start learning it or not... is another question.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
