|
So? Was I right or was I right? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I am more of a leads guy, not all that into tails.
|
|
|
|
|
it's not a problem to follow multiple lines but im talking about FOCUS, when you do 2 movies in the same universe squeezing out every bit of story you possibly could i imagine sw VIII to flop.
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry about that. It's two different stories, two different sets of characters and two different periods in time. I think they can come up with sufficient material for that.
What I WOULD worry about, though, is them using up their entire SFX arsenal in one movie. Now THAT's an actual possibility.
But nevertheless, It's with SW movies like sex: Even bad SW movies are better than no SW movies at all! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a prequel to the first one (Episode IV) in a trilogy of seven involving the same universe but from a different viewpoint and explaining some of the bits they glossed over in the original. (And boy did they gloss over things in the original!)
In that sense, it's like ST-DS9, ST-V, or ST-E compared with ST and ST-TNG. Same universe, different characters.
It's gotta be better than Force Awakens - which was ... um ... not that good, but a good starter for the next series. If they stop crossing it with Harry Potter!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Actually i might be lonely on that road but i kinda liked tfa, it was no star wars but it was a good movie. For a real star wars movie it should have been bigger, like big battles and big battles, did i already mention big battles?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I think the problem for me was that it spent too much time trying to "establish its credentials" as part of the Star Wars canon: "cram in the old familiar faces and everyone will know it's real" kinda thing. And what it missed out was the "soul" of Star Wars, the "feel" that made you want to watch it.
And there was a definite "Harry Potter" smell to the whole story! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: And there was a definite "Harry Potter" smell to the whole story!
At least Rey didn't get a letter to Hogwarts 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
"You're a Wizard Jedi haRey!"
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Her parents left her for good, the only thing that reminds her of their existance is the scar on her forehead...
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like my record of having seen none of them is going to continue unbroken.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Lawrence lookalike. Couldn't they hire her? With Forest Whitaker it would be at least some good acting I guess.
it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Impressive, and very interesting! 
Also, some guys have got X11 running on top of this shell.
Now, that is cool
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: Also, some guys have got X11 running on top of this shell.
Give some people an inch and they take a mile.
Give others one OS and they take another.
|
|
|
|
|
Well you have Ubuntu running on Windows 10, and X11 running on Ubuntu, so now if someone gets Wine running on X11, then we can have Notepad running on Wine running on X11 running on Ubuntu running on Windows 10. Inception!
|
|
|
|
|
Mind blown!
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: Inception
|
|
|
|
|
and if get Ubuntu to run inside Wine?
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa now - let's not get fancy!
/a singularity appears beneath your feet...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gratz! 
Might finally run X11 application, out of curiosity!
(hey, I heard there was nice SVG editors on Linux! might be worth it!!!)
|
|
|
|
|
I think I'll get to learn some Linux, at last 
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
I am very interested in this since I use linux and windows about 50% each. I'd like to see if performance is improved over the cygwin implementation as far as processing bash scripts.
John
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
