|
Then please search for all Messages containing "f***", "f******" and similar and Report them. Sick from my Point of view! I do not Support using this words, but writing it in English it is automatically "masked" and usually nobody to bother about it.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need to re-read my message, particularly the second line. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I had a Feeling that I don't understand it in the right way, sorry, a non native noob 
It was/is really not clear for me what has been removed.... But that is more a leak of my English 
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one is over sensitive here. This is not parliament and we are not here to rule the world. You should be aware that Hindi and English are totally different languages. It must not be translated in such cases. People who have english as there native language uses the word "fu***" in discussion,agree but the translated word "Ch****" is not used anywhere in India in "General" conversations. You are in USA. Ask your relatives living in India since when ch**** became a normal word. Its really really abusive as per as Hindi is concerned.
Don't defend people who insults someone. It is abusive and it will be.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
modified 10-Dec-15 16:31pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I am living in India and I know the meaning of c***** word, its common word genteelly used in India its meaning is 'An Idiot' or when some thing is not important so we normally say "Kya c******giri hai", but how can you mark a person abusive without knowing that word meaning?
For you f*** is common word, and that word you don't know is abusive 
|
|
|
|
|
I think same that it was not too much abusive word in India. I think, there is an option to devote/remove/mark any abusive comment if someone feel that the post should be removed, But deleting his account is not fairly enough.
He was CP member since 6 years, and just because of one special word, he lost his account.
Anyway, is there any option to re-activate his account?
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
So you mean, if i say 'you are biggest ch*** on this website' on a public forum in unmasked text,it is totally ok?
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
See this : http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5147174/Abuse.aspx[^]
Your friend used highly abusive words. It won't be tolerated even in future.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: It won't be tolerated even in future.
Unless they can get to 10,000 points first. Then it won't matter.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Unless they can get to 10,000 points first. Then it won't matter.
If you are talking about me,you are wrong. I've reported some high reputation accounts in past and as a result,highly abusive words are being supported just to oppose me! Funny. If you consider whole site,i agree with your point. Some of the members will be questioned on almost every occasion where some selective members(influential?) won't be even asked for clarification on same issues. Fact.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: If you are talking about me,you are wrong.
No it was in reference to someone I reported as abusive in spam and abuse forum a few days ago. Just have to laugh it off sometimes. Can't take it too serious.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
10k's definitely not enough Michael Martin[^] probably had ~40k when he was repeatedly nuked from orbit over the posts that gave us elephants and sunshines. IIRC Fatboy had more than that when he was banned; but I can't find his account to check what his rep score was.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't surprise me that it is Rohan that reported this originally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK not sure what part is directed at me?
"I've reported some high reputation accounts in past and as a result,highly abusive words are being supported just to oppose me! "
If so you need to get over yourself, I'm pretty sure I have not used highly abusive words towards you.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not that little guy who becomes personal over silly issues . I'm just concerned about double standards.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: I'm not that little guy who becomes personal over silly issues
Oh yes you are[^].
You shall be known as 'little guy' from now on. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's got nothing to do with how many points members have compared to him, the little guy just likes to apply his own set of rules when voting members off, despite it being pointed out to him by me and others that he is too over-zealous.
About the rep points, interestingly almost half of his overall points come from voting members as abusive - yet he doesn't even realise that he is causing most damge to the site.
|
|
|
|
|
Totally agreed (about his rep points),
He(little guy) marked any person abusive even if he don't know the meaning of that word and,
Even if he don't like or satisfied with solution given by any new member he marked that person to abusive its not fair at all.
|
|
|
|
|
The "member" who was banned replied to my post. I asked him not to use the abusive word (CHU****) and told him to retract his post.
If he has not done it , what should we do. you have any suggestion?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
