|
0x01AA wrote: Completely stupid the relation you make with the link!
I don't think it is more stupid than the message it answered.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I understand your concerns about the possession of weapons, same I have. But at the moment -if this continues - ... I do not know, it's not a good solution, but I would arm myself even ....
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This way, I understand you.
And taking into account that you are in Switzerland, the background is not the same as in USA.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: if a couple of French citizens had firearms...
...at the border.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: ...at the border.
Those French have some ...
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
You'd have a bigger bloodbath.
Please, no armsrace under the citizens, unless you provide each one with a (free) nuclear bomb.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Really? Over on this side of the Atlantic we have preferential locations for our crazies. They are called "gun free zones". But I really didn't mean to sidetrack the topic, truly I hope it's under control now. But someone just declared war on France. It is what it is.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
The difference, in Europe, is that citizens prefer to give guns to police and military rather having everyone (and anyone) carrying guns.
In Europe, we are choked by the number of weak spirited students fixing their grades by making bloodbath at their school. See how many times it append in a year! It is almost routine.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: But someone just declared war on France.
That "someone" is not recognized as a state o'er here.
And no, we do not "declare war" on everything around here. War is often not a very constructive way of solving issues.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed... What a tragedy folks... 
... having only that moment finished a vigorous game of Wiff-Waff and eaten a tartiflet. - Henry Minute
I'm still looking (eagerly) for wisdom in terms of best practices in OO design; and I doubt I'll ever quit looking. - BillWoodruff
Programming is a race between programmers trying to build bigger and better idiot proof programs, and the universe trying to build bigger and better idiots, so far... the universe is winning. - gavindon
|
|
|
|
|
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank You
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank You
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
Never rapped to do it 
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
modified 13-Nov-15 20:52pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Er, I think you dropped a 'p' there.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Possible, I am French and my English spelling can be approximative 
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't actually think this was possible:
class MyClass
{
OtherClass _otherClass;
...
public Populate()
{
OtherClass _otherClass = new OtherClass();
...
...
}
public void Process()
{
if (_otherClass.HasNoData)
TotallyFreakOut();
}
}
var thing = new MyClass();
thing.Populate();
thing.Process();
The gist is that I have a class with a member variable _otherClass. I initialise and fill that _otherClass with stuff in one method, then access and process _otherClass in another. The problem was that in the other method I was finding _otherClass empty, even though I'd traced line by line watching data be assigned to _otherClass.
I honestly thought the compiler would catch that - but evidently not! Live and learn.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Not classy, not classy at all.
|
|
|
|
|
That is expected, and the answer is "scope is a b*tch!"
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I honestly thought the compiler would catch that
It does. If you don't initialize this._otherClass.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Is this beyond the scope of it being Friday the 13th?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
You populated my head with buggy code, yet when I went and processed that code I found nothing!
I had to watch three times to find the bug
|
|
|
|
|
It won't compile because "public Populate()" is not valid without a return type.
If it's a CTOR, then it's named wrong. If it's a method, it needs a return type.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
