|
A "helpful member" edited the messages and removed the spam links - so I have deleted the messages rather than confuse the spam detector with further "innocent" message reports.
(I'll contact the member and explain why it's a bad idea)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=12022607[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion it is very minor and not worth posting here. Just flag the message as abusive and move on. Someone already responded and told them it was abusive and they have not continued.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
The abusive comment is edited/Closed. You are not seeing the original one made in response to my comment. The comment you are looking at is second one. So its repeating.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: You are not seeing the original one made in response to my comment.
In that case, please edit your OP and provide details. I, for one, won't flag someone's account just because it's posted here but I believe many do without even looking why.
Let's make sure people get a fair trial.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: I, for one, won't flag someone's account just because it's posted here
I(and many others) provide details as much as possible,but when it comes to comment especially like in this case, there is no way to show what the original content was as it's inaccessible.
BTW, updating the post.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: there is no way to show what the original content was as it's inaccessible.
Then I would not post it here.
I do see one comment that is marked as Closed. It reads, "if you dont have solution then stop to doing comments." That is not abusive. His next comment is "and you stop doing F******* comment" which is rude but hardly a reason for them to be kicked off this site.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
"if you dont have solution then stop to doing comments" was the same as the later one. He edited it and hence you are seeing the edited one which is ofcourse not abusive. Further, SUCH comment is abusive and must not be tolerated. I would have removed the post if he did it just once. This is the second comment.
It is Abusive and will be in future. It's not Lounge,it's QA. And one should not forget while making comment that this is a professional place,not his personal playground.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like you are saying that "if you dont have solution then stop to doing comments" is an abusive comment. If so, then no, not at all.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
No. It's not,but its original version was. Which is inaccessible.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Telling people to "shut up" if they say something you don't like, particularly when accompanied by rude language, has always been considered abuse in the past:
Even the Hamster in Chief agrees:
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5082276/Re-Shut-up-comments-are-bad-enough-even-without-us.aspx[^]
Not sure why you're suddenly arguing that it's acceptable behaviour? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 30-Sep-15 9:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Telling people to "shut up" if they say something you don't like,
That isn't how I see it. "if you dont have solution then stop to doing comments." Maybe I'm just not sensitive enough. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
As I read it, "if you dont have solution then stop to doing comments" is the same as "answer my question or shut up".
The second comment, "and you stop doing F******* comment", turns this from a rude exchange to an abusive one.
What interpretation of those comments did you have that didn't involve telling two people to shut up?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: "if you dont have solution then stop to doing comments" is the same as "answer my question or shut up".
I disagree.
Richard Deeming wrote: "and you stop doing F******* comment",
Yes, rude. Abusive? No.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree with your disagreement. 
Still waiting for your interpretation of those comments that doesn't involve telling two people to "shut up".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I disagree with your disagreement.
I agree that you disagree.
Richard Deeming wrote: Still waiting for your interpretation of those comments that doesn't involve telling two people to "shut up".
Keep waiting. You're the one who interpreted it to mean shut up. I didn't. I took it at face value. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: You're the one who interpreted it to mean shut up. I didn't. I took it at face value.
And that's the problem - I took it at face value as well, and I came to the fairly reasonable conclusion that saying "stop to doing comments" is equivalent to saying "shut up".
If it was just me, then we could agree to disagree. But at least two other people seem to have interpreted it in the same way, and previous comments along the same lines have also been interpreted to mean "shut up".
What is the difference between rudely telling someone to stop posing comments, and telling someone to shut up? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
You are way too persistent on something that means nothing at all. So, the only conclusion that seems logical is that you are unaware that not everyone thinks the same way you do. It's OK to have different opinions. After all, yours is an opinion and not a fact. If you can't see that then you may need other help.
You think asking someone to not post comments is the same as telling them to shut up. If your wife says, "Stop making comments" would you react the same exact way if she said, "Shut up." If you can answer that honestly then you'll see. If not, then good day.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: So, the only conclusion that seems logical is that you are unaware that not everyone thinks the same way you do.
Nope. If that was the case, why would I be asking you to explain your thinking? I'd just assume that you thought the same way as me, and were just being a contrary bugger for the fun of it.
RyanDev wrote: If your wife says, "Stop making comments" would you react the same exact way if she said, "Shut up."
If your wife told you to "stop f***ing talking", would that not count as telling you to shut up?
So, on the internet, doesn't telling someone to "stop doing F******* comment" count as well?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: If your wife told you to "stop f***ing talking", would that not count as telling you to shut up?
So, on the internet, doesn't telling someone to "stop doing F******* comment" count as well?
Now you're changing which quote your referring to just to suit your argument. Not interested.
I can go to the soapbox and chat with Mark or Collin to get this kind of behavior. No thanks.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I already stated 3 times that the comment you are talking about is not Abusive,but it is edited version and the problematic part was removed once i reported it here. Further,he made the same comment(original version) to another member. How on earth do you think that making such comments repeatedly doesn't mean Abusive?
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: I already stated 3 times that the comment you are talking about is not Abusive,but it is edited version and the problematic part was removed once i reported it here.How on earth do you think that making such comments repeatedly doesn't mean Abusive?
First off, I responded to Richard who said the edited version was abuse so I'm not sure why you think I was responding to you.
Secondly, as you said, I don't know what the comment was so how can I think it was abusive or not? I suggest posting what the comment was and if it got changed then don't be so sensitive about it. Let it go.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: I don't know what the comment was so how can I think it was abusive or not?
You are asking over and over again on many posts about why you should report something as Spam/Abuse? Consider the case,when we spot e.g. baba spam on moderation queue,we report it there so message will be nowhere. It gets deleted right away. Then we report it here,how to answer your question in such cases? There will be nothing to prove he/she was spammer. The thing is, this mechanism works like you have to trust some or the other way. Really. As per as OP is concerned, even one message is visible and i told you that the non abusive message was also abusive one in its previous form.
If you are unable to trust those tons of posts, i kindly request you to ignore them.Because most of the time, members don't have enough time for that discussion. Example is just above this thread.
Richard provided with the links which show past posts and even Chris is agree with the same. Then also you are not able to understand that posting comment "stop f**** comments" is abusive? I mean why?
Look at that account. Its disabled now. Enough people thought such comments as abusive. It IS and WILL BE abusive when it comes to Codeproject.com.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
