|
OriginalGriff wrote: and it makes sense to me
Now thats more than enough for me 
Fingers crossed and waiting for the KIND person who gives me a solution 
And guess what I already got a reply on the question by Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter, he suggested me to ask this to oracle.
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever you may think of the rules over here on CodeProject, they are a hundred times worse on StackOverflow. I've been flamed over there many times, sometimes even for just asking a question. I even got flamed for answering a question because someone didn't understand my answer so downvoted the answer.
Don't take anything personally. Keep up the good work, keep being helpful and keep being a good citizen of CodeProject. Your input is appreciated and absolutely vital to this community 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
I don't want to take anything personal. My point is these things is not good for a community. What if this happen to a newbie? They'll left the community for sure. We need a much better bond than this rather chasing those voting and all. I've seen a lot doing different things just to collect points 
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
|
|
|
|
|
I gave up on SO years ago: if you aren't part of the "ruling clique" then if you disagree with the establishment, your answers disappear. And sometimes the other answer magically changes to include what you said...strange that... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
SO is very, very cliquy. Whilst it can be good for answering very specific (black and white) type questions, it fails terribly on more discussion based, open-ended questions e.g. "What are the pros and cons of doing......." type questions.
There is a definite elitism about SO that jars with me. I much prefer the convivial nature of CP. I find it a far broader church
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few CP users who would fit in very well over there!
Mind you, they wouldn't go, because being "low on the totem pole" doesn't fit with their massive egos.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
And I know exactly who you mean too 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
And that of course would never happen on CP?
I had so many solutions deleted, because the questions were all of a sudden gone, I've essentially stopped bothering with answering any questions at all.
OriginalGriff wrote: if you aren't part of the "ruling clique"
Nothing to say, no siree!
OriginalGriff wrote: And sometimes the other answer magically changes to include what you said...strange that
Now that can't happen here, or can it?
 
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
|
I looked-up you subject (replace text inside Word's shapes) and found a lot of ideas how to do it (simple Selection do not contain the shapes and not the text inside shapes)...
You should do some Google, or reopen the question to let me (or others) to point you to the right direction...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I already resolved it myself.
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to hear that. By the way, don't judge the entire site based on the actions of a few people. Lots of sensible folks here as well
|
|
|
|
|
Just record a macro doing what you want and you'll see the code you need.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I get it done by considering the content with all the shapes. Check for shapes and fill it with the content.
If you've never failed... You've never lived...
|
|
|
|
|
A bit early, I know, but deal with it.
That chamber has a small door (5)
Good luck!
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Very good!
I'll not answer it now - far too early and I want to give the others a chance.
Possibly a little too easy?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Possibly a little too easy?
Yes, that's kind of how my clues are. 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe - but it's a good one! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I got an idea what i could be, but well i prefer waiting to see if i was right XD
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Cabin ??
That's what came to my mind when I read the word "chamber"
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, sorry. That's not it.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, okay.
Gotta think of something else having a door.
|
|
|
|
|
This one is too easy. I won't tell the answer, so that others can find out.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure. But if no one answers it, I will declare you or OriginalGriff as the winner. 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
OK...
THAT CHamber has a small door
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
