Bugs and Suggestions

ASP.NET MVC is a sub-type of ASP.NET and MVC is a separate framework

1-Jul-15 13:31

Message Removed

modified 2-Jul-15 9:29am.

Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan1-Jul-15 8:00

Re: ASP.NET MVC is a sub-type of ASP.NET and MVC is a separate framework

1-Jul-15 8:00

ASP.NET is the framework used to develop website and web applications, ASP.NET MVC is a sub-type or sub-framework used to develop web applications, there is no difference in both of them. MVC on the other side is a software development framework, and is not related to ASP.NET in any ways.

Where as in the Learning zones, ASP.NET is a separate where as MVC is a separate zone. Which must be combined. Also, in future releases there would be only one framework, ASP.NET MVC. Web Pages and Web API would be combined with MVC to make up MVC 6.

So, I guess these changes are also required to be made. Smile | :)

The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~

modified 1-Jul-15 14:32pm.

Richard Deeming1-Jul-15 8:18

Richard Deeming

1-Jul-15 8:18

Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote:
Web Forms is no longer a part of ASP.NET family

What makes you think that? Confused | :confused:

Updates for ASP.NET 4.6 – Web Forms/ MVC 5/ Web API 2[^]
What’s New in ASP.NET Web Forms in .NET 4.6[^]
Web Forms 4.6[^]

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

Re: ASP.NET MVC is a sub-type of ASP.NET and MVC is a separate framework

Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan1-Jul-15 8:31

Re: ASP.NET MVC is a sub-type of ASP.NET and MVC is a separate framework

1-Jul-15 8:31

I am sorry, I didn't mean to say .NET framework family, I mean ASP.NET 5 family. Because in ASP.NET, MVC would be upgraded to MVC 6 (consuming Web Pages, Web API and SignalR). Web Forms would be maintained in ASP.NET 4.6, not .NET framework 4.6.

Sorry for that error.

The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~

Chris Maunder16-Feb-17 3:46

Chris Maunder

16-Feb-17 3:46

MVC is separate from ASP.NET. Neither rely on each other.

cheers
Chris Maunder

Re: ASP.NET MVC is a sub-type of ASP.NET and MVC is a separate framework

Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan16-Feb-17 4:50

Considering anonymous down voting a message as armful [solved thanks]

16-Feb-17 4:50

Indeed. This is exactly what I meant to say.

But, getting over the previous post, let me know: Are we open to other categories as learning paths? Smile | :)

The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~

Patrice T1-Jul-15 6:59

Re: Considering anonymous down voting a message as armful

1-Jul-15 6:59

I consider anonymous down voting a message without an explanation as armful

In this discussion http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5081785/Re-Maybe-Original-Algorithm-Created.aspx[^]
I posted 2 messages -> Debator +2 points
The member how asked the question tanked me for my answer that lead him to the right place.
and, I am anonymously down voted -> Debator -16 points

Result -> Debator -14 points and the author of the discussion is happy.
What kind of expertise can I get of that ?

Patrice

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

modified 1-Jul-15 17:13pm.

Pete O'Hanlon1-Jul-15 7:10

Pete O'Hanlon

1-Jul-15 7:10

I rather suspect that whoever downvoted you did so deliberately because it appears as though you were fishing for votes with the second off last sentence in this post.

Re: Considering anonymous down voting a message as armful

Patrice T1-Jul-15 7:48

Re: Considering anonymous down voting a message as armful

1-Jul-15 7:48

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
I rather suspect that whoever downvoted you did so deliberately because it appears as though you were fishing for votes with the second off last sentence in this post.

I did it because the other member's reputation is more than 95% as participant. its message saying he is happy is its very first point as Debator.

Is there a rule ion CP forbidding it ?

Patrice

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

Pete O'Hanlon1-Jul-15 10:49

Pete O'Hanlon

1-Jul-15 10:49

There's no rule forbidding it, but some members seem to find it distasteful. At least you know you didn't offend one of the high rep voters - the downvote would have been much greater if you did.

Re: Considering anonymous down voting a message as armful

Patrice T1-Jul-15 11:12

Re: Considering anonymous down voting a message as armful

1-Jul-15 11:12

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
At least you know you didn't offend one of the high rep voters

and happy with it Smile | :)

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
the downvote would have been much greater if you did.

Yes I guess so

As I said, apart from participant reputation, the member is a whole 24 points after I up voted its question. What I consider a newbie in the forum usage.
On the other side, asking up vote to a 5 or 6 digits reputation member, I would consider it as disrespectful.

Patrice

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

Patrice T1-Jul-15 8:36

Re: Considering anonymous down voting a message as armful

1-Jul-15 8:36

Thanks you ! Thanks you ! Thanks you all up voters Smile | :)

Patrice

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

Patrice T6-Jul-15 12:21

I'd like a link to the Spam and Abuse Watch forum from the Discussions or Community menu

6-Jul-15 12:21

I guess the author of first message was not upset by my "fishing" since he just upvoted my answer.

Patrice

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

Jörgen Andersson1-Jul-15 3:05

Jörgen Andersson

1-Jul-15 3:05

To reach it faster from moderation.

Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

Request for new section

Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan1-Jul-15 2:25

Question appeared as article in moderation

1-Jul-15 2:25

When posting a new article, there is no section to write for Windows 10 or Universal Application Platform. I did mention this need a few days ago[^], but it didn't catch the eye.

Now in the article sections, there is no section for Windows 10 or Universal Application Platform. Windows Runtime, C# or other similar section won't serve well. I was going to publish a starter-guide to Windows 10 platform, but I was not able to find anything that might serve as a valid candidate so I chose Windows Runtime... But I am still requesting for a new section to be made available separately for Windows 10 or Universal Application Platform.

Thank you.

The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~

OriginalGriff30-Jun-15 23:13

OriginalGriff

30-Jun-15 23:13

A screenshot in case it disappears (very likely): https://www.dropbox.com/s/b6c6atr6imcm88a/2015-07-01CPScreen0001.jpg?dl=0[^]
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=174879&aid=1005606[^]
Not sure how he did it, but the header says:

This is a new version of the currently published question.

Article Moderation: Should this article be published?
Is purpose and goal of the article clear?
Could the article help someone in their day-to-day work?
...

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan1-Jul-15 2:21

1-Jul-15 2:21

Also, the article was added under Section: Uncategorized Quick Answers. I hope this would be helpful in figuring out what went wrong. Smile | :)

The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~

Chris Maunder16-Feb-17 3:47

Chris Maunder

16-Feb-17 3:47

You can do it if you're sneaky.

(It's a throwback to a bad design decision in 2008)

cheers
Chris Maunder

OriginalGriff16-Feb-17 3:52

OriginalGriff

16-Feb-17 3:52

My word.
You really are bad at catching up your emails, aren't you? Laugh | :laugh:

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...