|
Hi. I have just posted an article [^]. I've uploaded demo source code, but when I've tried to download it, the error occured. It says that the files uploaded are actually missing from the codeproject servers due to the "system" error. Before posting the article I've tried to download these files from the preview page, but there was no error.
Could you help me to correct this problem? 
|
|
|
|
|
Your link just brings us back to this page. Could you please post the correct link?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. The problem is already solved. The article's page contains valid links to source demo project. Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Any one should not suppose to vote his/her own articles, tips or technical blogs...As I can vote mine... 
|
|
|
|
|
You can vote for your own content. Why shouldn't you be able to?
|
|
|
|
|
why should I? If so then points should not be added into your point list...
|
|
|
|
|
The point of a vote is to say whether something is good, or not. Do you not think your article is good? On the other side - do the points matter that much to you that you care how many you have?
|
|
|
|
|
Take a bow Sir...
nothing to say after this....Grant my apology... It just looks little bit odd.. thats why I told..nothig else..and you are 200% right number does matter..
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing to apologise for. This is a common question and not something you should ever apologise about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Do you not think your article is good?
In that vein, would anyone actually down-vote their own article?
You can't vote for your own questions or answers in QA, so it's obviously recognised as a potential problem there. It does seem slightly odd that you can up-vote your own articles and forum messages.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: It does seem slightly odd that you can up-vote your own articles and forum messages
As the forums and articles came first, I don't think they slavishly have to follow QA.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: You can vote for your own content. Why shouldn't you be able to?
Noooo, seriouly ?
I think my reputation will improve faster than planned 
Hope my opinion about my own posts is not biassed.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
even I thought so.... 
|
|
|
|
|
Today is 1st July, not 1st April !
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since some month I get no notification mails. I checked my settings, my spam-folder, modified my email-address twice and reported it here at Codeproject - and still get no mails. The notification at the top of the page beside my loginname are OK.
What to do?
|
|
|
|
|
I've sent an email asking you to confirm you actually own your email address. Click the link and emails will start flowing.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris
thanks - I just clicked and am awaiting "the flow" 
|
|
|
|
|
May it be a flow and not a flood
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
"May the flow be with you ..."
Thanks, I got just the first mail. I hope the setting will last - it is the third time since my registration (5-6 years ago??) that the notification has to be fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
This idea may have been discussed previously. There are questions that are asked over and again. I'll pick this one because it was recent doubt in address of array? difference between usage of arr and &arr[^]. They often get very comprehensive answers. These could form the basis of a peer reviewed database where questions are added because they are common and maybe a couple of high rated answers are allowed to form the solution - or another agreed method.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Also the never ending "Object not set to instance" questions that get copy/pasted answers over and over.
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 30-Jun-15 4:36am.
|
|
|
|
|
Why to post this in this forum? BTW, answer removed.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
