|
Oh dear you are right, i need codereviews!
But since me and my other half are sticking to CLEAN CODE most of the code should be a ok.
Yeah maybe i train both hands on fully programming and rock of on two pc's to meet capacity needs 
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I have only been on one team in, say, eight years, where we didn't use basic, non-religious, scrum. OK, one other team we used Kanban, but I think that's close enough to scrum. For the non-religious, that is. It's always been good, and at least felt better than more formal processes; I don't know whether business felt as good as the developers though.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
We use anti-agile, whatever that is called, I guess all of these look like valid descriptors for how work gets done;
Antonyms for agile
apathetic
depressed
dispirited
down
dull
ignorant
inactive
lazy
lethargic
lifeless
rigid
slow
sluggish
stiff
stupid
brittle
clumsy
Maxxx wrote: What tools are you using?
I think they are called Project Managers.
It is a shite way of working.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Agile is good and I like it. Most people have a hard time with it though, for whatever reason, and thus, don't really implement the methodology well. Eventually, they are no longer practicing Agile anymore, and they are back to their old habits. 
I have used Rally for managing our user stories and defects.
|
|
|
|
|
Ernst Stavro Blofeld wrote: and they are back to their old habits
I find they're the best habits to have. One is so much more comfortable with them.
|
|
|
|
|
I work across multiple teams running scrum and kanban, mostly it works well and I quite like it as long as the people working on it are pragmatic and stick to core principles instead of religiously sticking to the text book. We're using Team Foundation Server for backlog management, boards etc...
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty much identical to you. Multi teams, Scrum, TFS, pragmatic, generally like it...
|
|
|
|
|
Every day we have a meeting where we are not allowed to say anything of substance. Even though I tell them everyday I do not need help I have to say that every day now I just say something like did this, no road blocks no help needed.
Then once a week we have a session where everything that was said that morning is repeated.
We pay large money for a certified scrum master who would not know an html document from a squirrel.
No credit is ever given to the developer and at one point we were told that everyone is a developer. Therefore no one is a developer.
Hate is far to weak.
Scrum means take your coding time away from you.
The BA designed the lay out of an ASPX page and demanded that the labels for the radio button list be above the buttons.
The purpose of the agile team is to stop the development of software and deprecate developers.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, building it is.
I am quite surprised at how easy Python is to build. Run a batch script then open the solution file and build. That's it.
It would be nice if all open source projects were this easy to build/use.
The only hiccups I have had are the batch files for Python 2.7.9 failing with newer TCL/TK versions, so I had to run the nmake commands manually.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Yap.Its quite useful for automation tools. We have a bunch of tools that uses and processes a few of our financial apps.
modified 18-May-15 18:09pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean building the compiler?
|
|
|
|
|
Yup. Building the Python Compiler/Interpreter/Runtime/etc. It just works™.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
|
WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India
into a SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and
to secure to all its citizens:
JUSTICE, social, economic and political;
LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among them all
FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the Nation;
Constitutions tend to be just so much hot air. I suppose there's a reason you didn't post this in the Soapbox.
I guess it's the ideal that counts, eh?
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I suppose there's a reason you didn't post this in the Soapbox.
Mostly that I didn't consider it political in the least, and felt the momentary need to tell the joke in the headline.
Don't worry, I won't bother your eye space further (today)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: and felt the momentary need to tell the joke in the headline.
Indeed, and it was quite excellent!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are the kind of things only to happen in the UK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Homer Simpson had a crayon up his nose for 30 odd years[^]
..and has it again up his nose 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure he hasn't some british ancestors?
|
|
|
|
|
Blutfaust wrote: These are the kind of things only to happen in the UK.
Well, if it happened in Russia, it would be an alien brain implant.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
That does snot sound like fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, seems like a crazy booger.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
