|
I don't program myself. I program others for which I use Jedi Mind Tricks.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
<wave hand="">We are not the fools you are looking for.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
CDP1802 wrote: We are not the fools you are looking for.
I don't program simpletons either. 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
My mother-tongue (Kannada - ಕನ್ನಡ) - because that's the language my mind thinks in, and understands best. And the body is subservient to the mind.
|
|
|
|
|
C++
It lets me encapsulate the parts that are nobody's business but mine, point the inquisitive anywhere else without regard for efficiency or accuracy, and I can keep parts private.
As a bonus, the source code is completely unintelligible and utterly un-maintainable, which saves the trouble of obfuscation.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote: C++
Roger Wright wrote: ... parts that are nobody's business but mine, ... , and I can keep parts private.
And yet, you let your friends touch them. 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Piet[^]
Art runs in my family. My father is a painter. It just makes sense.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
It began in the early twentieth-century when the ranch owner drilled a well to raise the quality of the agriculture. But when they had drilled the whole way down to the water they stopped because the water temperature was 200 degrees. In 1964 there was a second attempt. It also failed because the water was too hot. clickity[^]
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
F-word amazing! Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. Delightful 
According to my calculations, I should be able to retire about 5 years after I die.
|
|
|
|
|
My spidey sense says the owner is going to have it nationalized out from under him.
Rage against the narrative.
"To Build a Fire" - A dystopian novel about project management, and I am the dog.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I think you're right, but they'll do it with the excuse of saving some rare species of slime or to save the environment or some such crap.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
When you are dead you don't know it, it's only difficult for others.
It's the same when you're stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Navigator.PrepareMessageBox(TheApp.Messages.ErrorWarningMessages.StateProceduresMenuVM_MsgboxBody_OpenStateProcedureWithLock_2, stateProcedure.StateDescription, t.Result.LockMessage).UseButtons(MessageBoxOptions.OK).Show();
I've been working at this place about a month now, and EVERYTHING is way too abstracted out...
This is a classic example of over-coding something.. makes we want to find the guy who wrote and shake him violently.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
It does not add any obvious value over the standard way.
It does add the obvious disadvantage that it is different from those in all the textbooks and online examples. It would also incur an overhead, introduce the chance of bugs, and increase overall complexity.
But does it actually show a real MessageBox? Or is it something similar, with additional stuff? What does t.Result.LockMessage contain? Whotsitstype?
If it is simply the Windows MessageBox, then it is adding more costs than value 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
My point exactly... plus, they use the Fluent design (method chaining) EVERYWHERE.
I agree - there's not a whole lot of added value, IMHO.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
What a fool.
Everyone knows you should use ShowDialog() on MessageBoxes
|
|
|
|
|
That's awful. Much easier to just write (and faster to execute) as:
MessageBox (hWnd,
(LPCTSTR) "Warning"
(LPCTSTR) "Please open the state procedure with a lock."
MB_ICONINFORMATION | MB_OK);
The heck with localization.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: The heck with localization.
Yes, but it's so much fun, Ravi...
Been there, done that, got the UNICODE/UTF-8 scars to prove it.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Coder For Hire wrote: I've been working at this place about a month now, and EVERYTHING is way too abstracted out...
Are you being required to write sh*t like that, too? If so, then leave.
|
|
|
|
|
Already looking
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
You're put off pretty quickly I have to say, this is really just superficial. Looks like the messages are localized, but other than that doesn't seem unnecessarily verbose.
Wout
|
|
|
|
|
There is no good reason to code a messagebox like that. I'm put off because, like I said, EVERYTHING in this app is way over cooked. It takes FOREVERY to find something, and then FOREVER to make a small change.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they can switch one compile time flag or library and... Voila! it works on Mac or Linux?
Create your own wrapper/adpater on any vendor specific API.
|
|
|
|
|
You think that's bad, how about working with a class named VirtualEthernetCardDistributedVirtualPortBackingInfo ?
|
|
|
|
|
This reminds me of my current workplace. All the C++ class are heavily templated(The one I am working on, 20 data members are generic), even integer type are templated(can use int32 or int64). Very versatile but very difficult to find and read code because intellisense is not working as it does not know the type used; F12 is not working. Development time is impacted. PITA everyday!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
