|
Are you saying my handle is cute?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Not while you are holding that gun...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Be careful what you say to him. He strikes me as the kind who doesn't bother to call 911
|
|
|
|
|
He dials while the gun barrel cools...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot first, dial second.
|
|
|
|
|
When in trouble he doesn't call 911, he calls 1911
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Are you saying my handle is cute?
I think I shall not answer that.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, I expect stupid posts from people who do put in their real name or some sort of cutsey handle when signing up as well.
Especially if the handle implies they are ÜberCoderz
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, I'm definition 1.
Or more probably 3.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
That would make you either rich or having lots of heritage.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: people who can't even put in their real name
I am a private person. Is it bad that I don't want the world out their to know my real name?
You are safe using your real name as long as you don't attach any comments/posts to that real name, that may hurt you in the future (i.e. political, religious, or possibly offensive).
This could also hurt you when looking for work. All I have to do is Google Marc Clifton, and I can see everything you posted publicly. This is fine for you as long as you are not offending anyone.
With all that said, I have posted too many offensive and stupid things here, in the past, and by changing my handle to my real name "would" hurt me.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: All I have to do is Google Marc Clifton, and I can see everything you posted publicly. And who's to say that is his real name anyway?
Just because someone uses what looks like a real name does not mean it is their real name.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Is it bad that I don't want the world out their to know my real name?
No, I was just noticing how people who use the default username seem to ask, well, the default questions, as it were.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: people who use the default username
Ah, I see.
I guess they are people who don't plan on coming back to the site, or have a different sense of individuality, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good stuff, there.
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I use your name.
|
|
|
|
|
I do as well - but not on these sites!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I guess I will resist the temptation of asking anything else...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's fine: I use your real name for the...um...specialist sites...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I know understand the phone calls I get late in the night... so it was you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Conditional probability is not a bad thing. Nor is it a good thing. It's just knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: And if this post is too stoopid to bother replying to, then don't. I have a feeling somewhere around 11,000,000+ members will consider this stoopid then.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|