|
My motivation is to have the Menu and the Ribbon together.
Right now they are 2 distinct controls. But in my app (the one I plan to use that control) I want, for example, a "Windows" menu very much like the VS Window menu item: Showing open tool windows as checked menu items. I also want a Ribbon bar for image editing tools.
Finally I like the button drop down in Word2013, some times they looks like a menu item, but sometimes there are custom control in it. I want my MenuItem to support any kind of content with little work (if you put, say a slider, in a .NET SDK MenuItem it will be wrapped in a menu item, I don't wan any item container)
modified 21-Dec-14 10:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
I bookmarked your work - if I ever will do a WPF project I will consider to use it...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Cool!
By then it will be even super duper awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
QA Comment: tay fir answer tay dey day , repost respost na karye tay fir ki karye...
Anyone, please?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: I need some translation...
ta na ywd iqa hsnaop gklsm izxta hqvlx
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
The same for you
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Ixnay on the ranslationstay!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I thought no CCC today!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
That's not a CCC - it's a PLCC1!
1: Pig Latin[^] Crosword Clue
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
ph'nglui mglw'nafh repost R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say that's in the dialect of Nonsense called 'Pidgin.
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
WTF?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
It's the language of Mordor, that which I shall not utter here.
That particular piece of text you have seems to be part of an ancient ritual to summon the depth lord Cthulhu.
Beware, you know not of the dark forces that are at work here... (probably QA).
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
It is in Hindi and it is written as a parody to a Hindi Song from movie "Chak De India"...
Translation
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: tay fir answer tay dey day
Then at least give an answer
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: repost respost na karye tay fir ki karye...
Don't keep on saying its a report... else what one can do
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
virang_21 wrote: Chak De India is a very good movie indeed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry, we feel like you're an idiot too
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Wow ! That's like such a relief to know ! I feel the nights of cold-sweats, tremors, and deleria, gliding away from me like the clouds from a clearing-off storm because even though that smart Susan Schneider ... who's a professor of philosophy ... said:
"I’m not saying that we’re going to be running into IBM processors in outer space. In all likelihood, this intelligence will be way more sophisticated than anything humans can understand," ... which jangled my synapses like all over my neocortex and sent tidal waves of adrenalin right smack into my limbic system ... well, then that same Susan soothed me a bit by saying:
"If they were interested in us, we probably wouldn’t be here," said Schneider. "My gut feeling is their goals and incentives are so different from ours, they’re not going to want to contact us." And, then, that real intelligent Seth Shostak, who's a Director of Seti, and possibly a High Priest of Amon Ra, and a paid-up member of the Secret Illuminati, said right back:
"I’d have to agree with Susan on them not being interested in us at all," Shostak said. We're just too simplistic, too irrelevant. "You don’t spend a whole lot of time hanging out reading books with your goldfish. On the other hand, you don’t really want to kill the goldfish, either." So, I don't know about you, but I'm going to try and fall asleep repeating: "I am a goldfish," and maybe, just maybe, I won't wake the neighbors up screaming as usual.
Now, if you go ahead and read the whole story on this here 'Motherboard web-site, don't blame me for whatever effect it might have on you ! And, don't say you weren't warned: [^].
By the way, I'd like to wish you and yours (biological, or non-biological) a happy Holiday Season, sacred and/or profane as you autonomously choose based on your personal values, traditions, and culture. Not being in America, I can't really experience the efflorescence-of-shopping that so epitomizes the culture I was born bored in.
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
Inter stellar space travel might just not be feasible either, that's another possibility...
|
|
|
|
|
If you follow the nano-diamond trail, the answer is, possibly, yes [^].
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
I think the only reasonable assumption is that we and any "nearby" civilizations are all about average and the likelyhood of meeting a significantly superior civilization any time soon is very small.
And then, they will obviously be out looking either to party or to gather slaves for their mines.
|
|
|
|
|
The idea with a 15 billions years old universe on a youngling planet of only 4.5 billions years old planet is that, if life is common, we are the very late and backward newcomers...
|
|
|
|
|
The issue of the relationship between time and the rate of evolutionary transformation is a fascinating subject area.
Some scientists believe that evolution is not linear over time (for many different reasons), but "quantum" in nature with periods of remarkable elaboration that almost defy reason (such as the rapid evolution of the human neo-cortext and the proliferation of our species); some scientists. and too many air-headed mystics. believe (panspermia) that there is inter-stellar transmission of genetic materials via comets, asteroids, aliens, etc.
I consider it possible that some much "younger" solar-system than our own might have planets with life-forms that are quite advanced compared to ours; they might have invented Super Mario eons before we did
Seriously, I also consider it possible that what we experience as our "real lives" are dreams in the mind of some God, gods, extra-corporeal but not robotic entity, rock, blade of grass, or dog.
I sleep easier thinking these thoughts and smiling, because I know I'll never know the truth ... at least not in this present incarnation.
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
I find it very interesting to ask the questions: is asking if evolution is "reasonable" reasonable; or, is asking any question, including this one, simply anthropomorphic asininity ?
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution is a universal law of the same caliber than thermodynamic.
All you need for its mathematically evident presence to be felt is things (say living creature) which, at least once, make imperfect copies of themselves...
|
|
|
|