|
I guess...
...I can leave my coat on
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
28 I have not heard of.
19 I have read (actually still reading War of the Worlds - really interesting descriptions of the area where we live).
|
|
|
|
|
I've read around 10, give or take a couple. Just can't remember. I've seen a few more as movies.
If I read them on Wikipedia, does that count?
|
|
|
|
|
I've read 17 of those.
I think the list is ridiculous.
First, Don Quixote is an enormous bore and terribly overrated.
Secondly, and I find it difficult to respect any list that doesn't have Dracula on it.
Thirdly, where is Kurt Vonnegut?
|
|
|
|
|
Only read one (39. Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe)
|
|
|
|
|
Good for you, that's probably the most important must-read book on that list.
|
|
|
|
|
..merely a place-holder to justify the ads.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I've read 8, seen few more as movies, if you count watching the movie.
I think there are a number of books that should have been mentioned over what was presented. Other than HG Wells, Mary Shelly or Douglas Adams where were the some of the other notable Sci Fi writers? Phillip K Dick, Robert A. Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, Ray Bradbury.
Too many books, too many books...
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be hard pressed to keep my list down to only 100 if we were listing the 'must read' science fiction novels.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: 100 novels everyone should read normal people only read under duress
FTFY
|
|
|
|
|
21. I'm appalled that the Foundation Trilogy by Asimov (or Asimov's I Robot series) is not on that list!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Come now, Marc. This list was for serious literature, not that populist tripe.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Wheeler wrote: This list was for serious literature, not that populist tripe.
And that's why Lord of the Rings was on the list? Serious literature? Well, maybe the elven poems could be considered such. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
You'll note that Lord of the Rings was entry #100, the bottom of the list. I have a feeling the only reason it was included was that Tolkien was English, and his trilogy has earned more money been read more times than the rest of the entries on the list combined.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Wheeler wrote: been read more times than the rest of the entries on the list combined.
Or at least watched.  I'm constantly surprised by how few people I meet haven't actually read the books, even The Hobbit. I obviously run in the wrong crowds!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I'll admit I haven't read them recently... well, since 1985. That's more of a reflection that I've been reading a lot of 'hard' science fiction lately, and haven't been interested in reading fantasy.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
19!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
I've read magister ludi when I was on a Herman Hesse binge in college, but I'd never put it on a must read list.
|
|
|
|
|
With my reading habits I was surprised that I have read about nine and started (add abandoned) another three.
|
|
|
|
|
10; normally on a list like that I'd score around 20....
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
The list title is incorrect. It should be "Books that I want everyone to think I personally have read, so they will have to show me respect as a smarter man than they".
I'll bet the compiler has read even less than you have.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
17
No more than that because
a) never heard of it
b) feeling barfish just contemplating it
or
c) too busy with better books
Saw the movie "Crash". Can't bear Ballard's writing, so didn't rad the book, but the story was good.
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't they just say "Everyone should read 100 novels"?
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Don't feel bad. I have a private library of nearly 13,000 volumes -- yes, I've read them all; I'm a novelist as well as a software engineer, and reading widely is a novelist's occupational requirement -- and of the 100 books on the Telegraph's list I've read only 23. But the list contains quite a number of novels I consider garbage, having read snatches of them and tossed them aside with a snort.
What comes to mind in this connection is Ambrose Bierce's definition of a classic: "A book everyone wants to have read, but no one wants to read." That applies to quite a number of the most frequently cited "classics," and sometimes for very good reasons!
(This message is programming you in ways you cannot detect. Be afraid.)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
