|
Dilbert[^]
Strange, my filter blocks both of those... 
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
The one about chocolate also ?
(He meant chocolate for the second, didn't he ?)
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Judging by the eyeballs, it wasn't Dairy Milk... 
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
I am so glad I swallowed the coffee before that image popped up!
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
I feel so all alone...
|
|
|
|
|
i thought you have always been alone like every one else....or are you some times possessed?
|
|
|
|
|
littleGreenDude wrote: I feel so all alone...
Really, when it said there were 40,000 people online you felt connected? 
It's all an illusion. The matrix has you.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris answered that question in S&B, but I cannot seem to find it anymore.
And I do not remember what it was 
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it was actually a count of members who were signed in. And since most of us never sign out, it was not considered a very accurate value.
|
|
|
|
|
So ... you can sign out ? Really ? 
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Well you can try ... mwa ha ha ha ha
|
|
|
|
|
True, I never sign out ...
|
|
|
|
|
It's a count of the current number of sessions. It's accurate (and will be back in the next couple of days).
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it was accurate. I could be wrong, though.
modified 30-Aug-14 6:56am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the problems starts already at how to define online member count
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote:
I don't think it was accurate. Could be wrong, though. |
Make your mind up -- is it inaccurate or wrong?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Alright, grumpy, I fixed it for you. 
|
|
|
|
|
Id be a great grammar nazi, if I weren't so busy taking the mick.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Something something about redundancy and people never really logging off anymore....
|
|
|
|
|
Because it doesn't matter
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
The counts will be back in the next couple of days.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
How do you google for Google? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's easy[^]
--
"My software never has bugs. It just develops random features."
|
|
|
|
|
Um, is it worth noting that Bing returned google.com in its results, but Google didn't?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
