|
Michael Martin wrote: Only yours Jeremy, only yours. You need to cut back on the oil mate.
Ironically, I have deeper connections with women that most people ever will, simply because I'm open and honest with them. Most guys aren't. When it comes to guys, they're all fake with me. Go figure.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Are you still using horses as an argument against gay marriage?
|
|
|
|
|
If I had any idea what you're talking about I could answer this.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
95% of my FB friends are people I know in real life. The rest are friends of friends who share common interests with me, and the only reason I haven't met them yet is geographical inconvenience.
If you have a problem with fake relationships on FB, the problem is with you, not with FB.
|
|
|
|
|
RASPeter wrote: If you have a problem with fake relationships on FB, the problem is with you, not with FB.
 OK.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Now, I have to admit that I'm a frequent user of Facebook so I don't fall into the active dislike camp, but one thing that really gets on my chest-ends is the ever changing security and privacy on FB. Is this private? Yep, but how about tomorrow? How about next week? Oh look, they changed their security policy and my previously private posts are now public.
|
|
|
|
|
Been there. It is not really intuitive but it is not that difficult as well. Hell, way better than doing anything in SAP for God's sake.
|
|
|
|
|
d@nish wrote: but it is not that difficult as wel
If you're technically capable, it's not that difficult - providing you can find which particular update security setting you're meant to be changing, but how about those who just know how to log into FB? This never ending series of twiddles and flubs make it very confusing for the neophyte.
|
|
|
|
|
Totally agree to that. That is the reason why these stupid apps, hoax and other shite prevail. But that is common with internet. It is just that FB is insane user base and hence liable for scrutiny.
|
|
|
|
|
d@nish wrote: way better than doing anything in SAP
As is brain surgery. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Off to nearest hospital I am. It does seem simple. 
|
|
|
|
|
Because it saves time? 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Of course wit and humor is the way to go but there has to be a substantial reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
Apparently an interview is passed or failed in the first 12 seconds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMmfJWITrR0[^] so why would we need a substantial reason to dislike a website or service?
LINK: NSFW if you have your speakers turned on. It's QI, it has Jo Brand on the panel, it starts with rude words.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I use it to stay in touch with friends and family but I post very little as I have no desire to live my life on line. Except, of course, for CP.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
I am not questioning amount of usage. I am questioning why people crib about it. A reason please. A valid one.
|
|
|
|
|
d@nish wrote: I am questioning why people crib about it.
Because people live out their entire lives online. Dumb. I pretty much said that - guess you missed it.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
I know that but that is not a reason to call amazingly well performing web application.
|
|
|
|
|
d@nish wrote: I know that but that is not a reason to call amazingly well performing web application.
That sentence makes no sense.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
[Homer voice]D'oh[/Homer voice]
It is not a reason blame an amazingly well performing web application.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't blaming it for anything. You can't blame an application for the way that people choose to use it.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Poke.
Is that still a thing?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I've never poked anyone!
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
mark merrens wrote:
They make pills for that.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think people who aren't on Facebook actually hate it, they just don't think it's for them.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
