|
|
This forum[^] still has the old voting mechanism in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris said that was intentional. Can't remember his reason though.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
I believe this is the Chris version of "it works on my machine".
|
|
|
|
|
That's because it's for tools and so 1-5 voting has been kept in place.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: That's because it's for tools
There are sooo many jokes; I'll bite my tongue.
|
|
|
|
|
Always a pleasure 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Got an email for participating in a CodeProject Internet of Everything survey 2014. (link: [^]) Clicked the link. Got "Server Error in '/' Application." Looks a lot like an IIS error. Been trying to click through for a while now. The details are sparse, but it may help:
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.
Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customerrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customerrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="Off"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customerrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
|
|
|
|
|
I have reported an answer in the Q&A section as not an answer. Afterwards my name was shown in the Quick Answers list as the (last) one who updated.
Is this by intention or a bug?
|
|
|
|
|
Jochen Arndt wrote: the (last) one who updated.
I dont see anything like this?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed the same, but it looks like it only happens if your report is the last report necessary to delete the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: it only happens if your report is the last report necessary to delete the answer.
Yes
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My report was the second one and the answer was still there after reporting.
The answer is gone now and the list shows probably the name of the last one who reported because that name does not occur as poster or editor.
|
|
|
|
|
With almost every (every new) article there is a problem of missing images. It seems to me a problem of the submission wizard...
[edit]
Just spotted that after posting a comment on the article the images are show, but page refresh do not help...
[/edit]
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure ProgramFOX already nailed it here[^].
Just like you mention in your edit, I have found that once you post a message in the Comment section, you get redirected to the actual revision that is up for moderation - you can see the URL change in the address bar.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that he talks about the content of the moderation queue - that it contains already approved and still editing articles (that was also reported a few times in the last weeks). But I'm talking about the images inside an article...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that is because the images are in a temporary subfolder and are moved to the article folder once the article is approved. The article link in the queue is the URL the article will have once it is approved and there, the images are expected to be in the article folder.
I am sorry if my explanation is confusing, but I believe it is correct.
To confuse matters even more, you will occasionally come across a brand new article in the queue where the images are showing up just fine (such as this one[^]), but that seems to be because the article links to off-site images.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I think I got you, after all...
But to summarize it - we are in trouble...I reported about 10 articles as 'Missing images' because of that, so maybe we have to send some seeds out to Canada...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
You'll need to redirect them to Australia. I'm on the other side of the planet this weekend.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
And you took the poor hamsters with you!? How cruel of you! 
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I am with you on this one, good spot from M.ProgramFOX.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I've just gone through every article in the pending queue and all images are in place. Dammit.
I'm keeping an eye on the issue and, assuming I can spot it happen in the next day or so, should have a fix out.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It happening only for new article that really need approval. But in the queue there are also articles that already approved or still not published...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
It looks like you have fixed the problem with the Moderation Queue (I hope my "article" helped), but it is not 100% fixed. It works correctly on Web02, Web03 and Web04, but Web01 is still exhibiting the bug.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
