|
Ah, alright. 
|
|
|
|
|
That should never happen. We've specifically blocked political ads.
Please ensure you click the X at the top left to report this ad. We can then track it down and block it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Check this screenshot. Clickety[^] Found bunch of off-topic ads.
I was loading random CP pages randomly for last 20-30 mins for you to get those ads. I have reported all those ads except that lipstick ad because there's no option & that's a video ad. And check the red circle inside image, I think that could help you on some way.
|
|
|
|
|
In the Forum, when you click Bookmark with Fluid Layout active, you get an icon that appears lower and behind some other icons.
I have uploaded an image of this Here[^], and I have replicated the glitch on both FireFox and Chrome (Up to date as of 04-18-2014).
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the report. All fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
how come it's just a little head now?
it was a Bob of some kind for over a decade!
|
|
|
|
|
That is something active for some months. There are new cathegories for the users.
The little head is for the people that just registered.
The other ones you can see them here[^]
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: The little head is for the people that just registered.
my CP ID is 42. i think i joined the day the site started. maybe the second day.
|
|
|
|
|
In that case, I would expect that you simply haven't "done enough" to merit being classified in one of the other "icon categories".
I am in no way trying to say that you have done nothing since the site was created, so please, take no offence to that, but the "new" icons are specific to different things, and I would guess that is the reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, and I think what Nelek meant by "just registered" was that that is all they did, not that they had done it recently.
|
|
|
|
|
Zachery Hysong wrote: what Nelek meant by "just registered" was that that is all they did,
that might be true.
though it's not true that all i did was register. but, i guess what i did to get my old Bob icon isn't considered worthy any more.
so sad.
(ok look, i have a Bob now! the world is right again!)
|
|
|
|
|
As I am pretty new here. Can you tell me what the Bob icon was for?
What did you do to get it?
|
|
|
|
|
i think i got it because i bought a copy of VS 2002 through CP (they were a reseller). i had a 'supporter' icon, IIRC.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, well you got it back now! YAY!
Apparently there is no Supporter Icon anymore, the closest thing to it seems to be the Premium, which I have because I have a Paid Account in ::Workspaces.
|
|
|
|
|
As Zachery said, with "just registered" I was not meaning the time, I was meaning the content (a.k.a. "only" registered).
Now that you have filled your profile, you have the "professional" bob with the suit.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: As Zachery said, with "just registered" I was not meaning the time, I was meaning the content (a.k.a. "only" registered).
yep. sorry about the misunderstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
No problem, enjoy your suit-dressed bob (or future improvements) 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The supporter Icon was deprecated several months ago - and about 10 years too late.
The original supporter icon (which you earned back in - what was it? - 2003? - was only meant to be an annual thing. We never got around to deactivating them until this year.
However, you now have a nice suit on. It's a little small, but that's the style with the kinds these days...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
)
Phew![^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Many of us visit this site on regular basis.
we have lots of theory material on this site.
but sometimes many developer stuck at practical implementation level.
it will be good if any of us create any practical assignments/step by step implementation including examples for learning purpose for technologies like mvc,jquery etc.
|
|
|
|
|
There are lots of samples in the Articles section[^]. If you need help with any of them then you can post a question in the forum at the end of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
Now a days I am going through so many posts in Spam And Abuse regarding site driving spam. Should it really be banned? My question is, if I found some solution which best work for some issue, why not to suggest it?
I agree that is should be warned or banned if it continues, but I saw so many posts pointing out them as Site driving spam just after two or three posts.
I am lil bit confused about am I right or not? because here at Codeproject, we are not entitled to post answers which points to free stuffs only. If some one suggests some paid products, he will get kicked in minutes [in many cases, not all]. Should we really consider them as site driving spam?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know the others, but I don't report every commercial product.
If the person answering says it is commercial but it really fits the requirements of the question, I don't say anything and let it be.
What I do report are the messages that are suggesting sites that don't really fit the needs of the OP.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: it really fits the requirements of the question
That's what I am trying to say. If its relevant then it should not be reported.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
