|
Hi Team,
i am getting some error on an answer which was posted to my Question. when i suppose to click on the answer link it expands all the other links in that page. it looks like there was a bug please have a look
the link on which i am getting error
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4749967/Re-IMultiValueConverter-and-IValueConverter-Interf.aspx[^]
follow this link and click on the reply from Pete O'Hanlon. you will see all the other link in that page get expanded.
Note: i am getting this issue for this particular link( answer from the abobe member) and only in IE 9.
_AKA_KSN_
|
|
|
|
|
If you reached the link from a search result then this is by design. Search (eg Google) may provide a link to a question, but the content it thinks you want could be in a different question, so we expand them all to help you scan a little easier.
|
|
|
|
|
Let me clear hear, i am opening my questions for which i have got reply. this issue is only for my current post. if this was the actual behaviour am ok with that. you can close this bug.
_AKA_KSN_
|
|
|
|
|
I am using IE 11.
If I reply to the following link
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4752784/Ethernet-code-for-talking-to-Hardware-I-O.aspx[^]
And then I select the entire line that is in bold and hit the "Quote Selected Text" button it gives me a popup that says "You did not select any text to quote".
If I select part of that line, and do the same process then it works.
This has been happening to me for a while but this is first time where it was easily identified as to how it did and didn't work for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Works fine for me. 
<voice type="Ebeneezer Scrooge"> Bah. dumb bugs </voice>
|
|
|
|
|
With IE 11?
I just tried Firefox and it works.
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: IE 11
I see the problem. (CP has issues with IE 11)
<voice type="Ebeneezer Scrooge"> Bah. dumb bugs </voice>
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed the same[^] and I've come to the conclusion that I can't quote anything containing markup code.
|
|
|
|
|
Just a thought: the APOD postings appear quite popular: perhaps a link on the home page to the image of the day would be nice.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way I can block a member? Make him/her unable to view my account or reply to my posts?
|
|
|
|
|
Have I offended you? 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Not you
|
|
|
|
|
Not on your own no. You would require others to help you get them thrown off the forums. Seems a bit extreme to me. If someone is irritating you, just ignore them. If you don't respond people usually give up.
|
|
|
|
|
The thing is he/she keeps reporting me for no reason and I'm afraid of the worst...
|
|
|
|
|
So what good would blocking them from replying to you do. They would still be able to report you.
|
|
|
|
|
Blocking them from replying to me andalso blocking them from reporting me
|
|
|
|
|
So, potentially a clever spammer could set it so that NO members could report them. Not a good idea.
A better bet is to have a word with Chris/Sean to ask them to take a look and possibly have a quiet word with the person who is reporting you.
|
|
|
|
|
have you seen Sean lately 
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: a clever spammer could set it so that NO members could report them. Not a good idea.
He will be very lonely if he blocked all members. Not a good idea also.
|
|
|
|
|
The best way is not to respond to their posts.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Can I know who is the member that reported me?
|
|
|
|
|
No. To prevent "revenge" downvoting that information is not shown
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Marty wrote: To prevent "revenge" downvoting that information is not shown
|
|
|
|
|
These things happen on an open forum like CodeProject. Don't fret about it, it isn't doing you any real harm.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
For the past too days I noticed that articles that approved - and had images and linked files then, are missing all here files when came out to the public. The authors have to go back for a second round...
What I saw that the link changes from image.png to 12345/image.png (the number is seems to be the article no) and the physical image is gone.
It's possible that the hamsters didn't got their seeds so eating our files?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
