|
Vs.Net is not officially supported on 98 at all. thats why a lot of vb 'homebrew' programmers are crying over their keyboards! 
---Guy H ( ---
|
|
|
|
|
GuyHarwood wrote:
Vs.Net is not officially supported on 98 at all. thats why a lot of vb 'homebrew' programmers are crying over their keyboards!
I suppose that's one benefit on VS.net, keep the homebrew VB programmers off the scene 
To iterate is human, to recurse is devine.
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the release date 2003-04-23? ASAP after that date would be optimal for me.
|
|
|
|
|
You can get it now, its available on MSDN. im installing it at the mo 
---Guy H ( ---
|
|
|
|
|
Where, where, where? Is it the final version?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes full version, after the Final Beta in the Subscribers Downloads section.
I'm using it and it's good
-
kromozom@msn.com for MSN Messenger
-
|
|
|
|
|
The installation went well.
I got some INTERNAL COMPILER ERRORs though when compiling, but after some fixing they went away.
I got some erronious warning details, often for unused params saying something in the lines of:
see std::basic_string<_Ty, allocator<blabla>, blablabla>
with:
[
_Ty = sometype
]
But the details were totally wrong, the unused param could be an int but it would complain on std::basic_string anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
I assume we are talking about upgrading for production use. Upgrading existing code bases and the like.
I'll be using VC2003 for any new projects when my MSDN subscription disks arrive. However all my current codebase will remain on VC6, just as it did when VC2002 came out.
I have only migrated one application from VC6 to VS2002, and that was an app that I last worked on in 2000. The only reason I upgraded it was because it was so old, I knew it would be getting a full system test before being shipped.
Michael
'War is at best barbarism...Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.' - General William Sherman, 1879
|
|
|
|
|
do you think questions cover all possible cases?
t!
|
|
|
|
|
At least two were missed:
- Someday... *sniff* Someday we'll move away from VS v.5
- just as soon as HELL FREEZES OVER!
S • H • O • G • N • I • N • E
I can't believe it... the way you look sometimes.
And i don't want it... the things you're offering me.
|
|
|
|
|
What reasonable other cases are there?
Turbo Pascal to VS.NET 2003 by 3042?
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Macbeth muttered:
I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er
Shog9:
Paul "The human happy pill" Watson
|
|
|
|
|
How about:
Compiled MS-Basic 7 for MS-DOS to C++ sometime real soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Watson wrote:
Turbo Pascal to VS.NET 2003 by 3042?
lol. What about those of us who are still using GW-BASIC? 
Ryan
Being little and getting pushed around by big guys all my life I guess I compensate by pushing electrons and holes around. What a bully I am, but I do enjoy making subatomic particles hop at my bidding - Roger Wright (2nd April 2003, The Lounge)
Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late - John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Watson wrote:
What reasonable other cases are there?
There is one :-
I am using VS.NET 2003 Final Beta now and will move to the Release version as soon as MS ships the CDs to me (prolly in 3-4 weeks time). I didnt know whether to select the "I already use it" option or the "I'll move from VS.NET 2002 to VS.NET 2003 by June" option. Finally I took the latter but am still unsatisfied with my vote. Because I am not using VS.NET 2002 now 
Nish
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
Review by Shog9
Click here for review[NW]
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody will die, so don't worry
I have a meg to go in the VS.NET 2003 RTM download. But I chose "by June." *shrug*
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Macbeth muttered:
I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er
Shog9:
Paul "The human happy pill" Watson
|
|
|
|
|
How about, I don't know? I picked no current plans, since that was the closest. I guess the "No current plans" should be broken down into "Possibly, but I don't know when", and "No way I'll ever upgrade".
"When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it's longer than any hour. That's relativity." - Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Nuff said.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Macbeth muttered:
I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er
Shog9:
Paul "The human happy pill" Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Watson wrote:
What reasonable other cases are there?
* will it be better than the previous release? if not, no way.
-c
Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler
|
|
|
|
|
Tibor Blazko wrote:
do you think questions cover all possible cases?
N + O = NO
Z. None of the above.
Later,
JoeSox
www.joeswammi.com
"we'll make great pets!"[lyrics^]
Pets - Porno for Pyros
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
