|
I use to use UK2.net, put then many years ago switched over to 1and1. I switched to them because of their hosting packages, then moved up to virtual server etc.
Never had any problem with them.
|
|
|
|
|
My thoughts at this moment are that I should have a separate host and a separate registrar.
The idea of being legally responsible to only one party, and that party having such a strong influence of both the hosting and the registration; that's just too creepy for me at this moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clicked, looked, saw everything about hosting, nothing about registration.
Evidently, the money is this biz comes from hosting, not registering, not renewing.
|
|
|
|
|
I look after an organisation that is registered through Newnet. The other one is actually registered through http://www.lcn.com/[^], (not EUK) sorry about that. Most of these companies do web hosting as their main business and registration as a side issue. Whether you do everything through one organisation or split between two is your (free) choice.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting idea; renewing with a company outside the USA.
Others who have done that; please post your personal experience.
|
|
|
|
|
C-P-User-3 wrote: renewing with a company outside the USA. Each country has an official registrar responsible for all its domains. Other (hosting) companies provide the actual registration service and maintenance. The UK registrar is http://www.nominet.org.uk/whoweare/whatwedo/overview[^].
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
C-P-User-3 wrote: Comments that suggest asking any internet search site will be summarily ignored. Only because you added the comment... Google[^]
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Whut? Whut? Did someone say summat?
|
|
|
|
|
Google said it, you believe it, that settles it.
|
|
|
|
|
Even after the advice I found for you, you couldn't resist?
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Stupid quiz[^]. Sensible answers got 31, but intentionally stupid got 10!
How high/low can you go?
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently, I have done it before: 25
But the highest I could get it even trying hard to be boring was 40...and the lowest I could get was 10.
|
|
|
|
|
Something is wrong as it says 25. I thought it would be 10 or 60!
|
|
|
|
|
I did nothing, no questions were asked, didn't provide any answers, and my mental age was 25. Sounds appropriate, but makes absolutely no sense.
I don't get it...
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Go to the site, cut the "/result.html" part off the address, and load it again - it'll go through the questions (but don't expect anything "in depth", or even interesting)
|
|
|
|
|
That is what I ended up doing, now I'm 20. You're right, nothing in depth, all were questions that concern the "socially connected".
Bah humbug! Young whippersnappers [^]...
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually rather closer than I'd predicted. 40
Thanks Nagy.
|
|
|
|
|
Meh, I hate quizzes where the answers are laser focused and irrelevant. For example, on the weekends, I neither do chores, go to bed early or go and get drunk. Where is stay up all night gaming? Huh, huh?
|
|
|
|
|
Trying for the lowest score I got:
"Your mental age is 13"
Trying for the highest score I only got 34.
I wonder what highest mental age that test will ever give.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
I believe answering the survey in itself removes a lot of years from your score.
|
|
|
|
|
Sensible answers taking into consideration I'm offshore and my birthday lands this week while i'm out here, resulted in a 37.
|
|
|
|
|
So you'll be having a wild night on the Iron Bru then?
|
|
|
|
|
You mean IRN-BRU
Sure will, that and a box of Ferrero Rocher that the kids put in my offshore bag.
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: You mean IRN-BRU
Sorry - I don't speak Scottish!
|
|
|
|