|
mikepwilson wrote: It's like Tyson, the dude has become nothing more than a professional interviewee.
And cameo appearances on B movies.
|
|
|
|
|
Mike "Cheese Wiz" Hankey wrote: And cameo appearances on B movies.
I didn't think Neil had progressed beyond TV?
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1183205/[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
mikepwilson wrote: Physicists really need to get a hobby.
They should start working on the infinite improbability drive .
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
They might as well at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
It is infinitely improbable that they will do so....
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Why would anyone doubt that god is a programmer?
|
|
|
|
|
Shirley that's been posted before? Did you notice the date - 12th December 2012.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly the Matrix is affected by the Millennium Bug.
Going to have to switch you all off for a few minutes while I fix it.
But you won't notice. Your snapshot files will save state and you'll carry on where you left off.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Shirley that's been posted before? Nice Airplane reference. Wonder how many in the audience are too young to even get it?
|
|
|
|
|
I do sometimes feel this is all just a computer simulation, but then the mice come along and tell me otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory.Gadow wrote: I do sometimes feel this is all just a computer simulation, but then the mice hamsters come along and tell me otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hamsters were an upgrade, after the Mice discovered Brockian Ultra-Cricket and lost interest in the Question to the Ultimate Answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting just scanned it but will look at it later...I've actually started the project I've been putting off forever. Went and got materials yesterday and started the actual project today!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
In any simulation of an infinite universe the simulation would run into finite limits since the simulation, being smaller than the real universe, would have limits. Fortunately, our universe has no such number of smallest resolution ... so we know that we are not in a simulation ... oh.
|
|
|
|
|
But since the "real' universe is infinite, a simulation could be so big we couldn't tell the difference between really, really, really big and infinite.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the simulation is smart than you. it would perceive what you are doing and automatically increase the resolution only for you.
|
|
|
|
|
So post-human automatically means universal-scale? Any species that evolves to a universal scale could be able to predict what such a universe could be without having to develop one. Maybe they could create their own pocket universe instead. Since it's all conjecture, I conjecture that I am right.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: could be able to predict what such a universe could be without having to develop one
Not so sure about that: emergent properties can be extremely unobvious.
Take the game of Life for example - the rules are extremely simple and fully known.
Every cell interacts with its eight neighbours, which are the cells that are horizontally, vertically, or diagonally adjacent. At each step in time, the following transitions occur:
Any live cell with fewer than two live neighbours dies, as if caused by under-population.
Any live cell with two or three live neighbours lives on to the next generation.
Any live cell with more than three live neighbours dies, as if by overcrowding.
Any dead cell with exactly three live neighbours becomes a live cell, as if by reproduction.
Despite the rules being fully known, the existence of Gliders, Destroyers and Glider Guns are not obvious unless they actual game is run - these are emergent properties of a system.
Life is a simple game, with simple rules. Assuming that the universe run of rules at least as complicated as the ones we currently believe it does (or even if there are an order or two of magnitude less complex) the emergent properties of such a system are going to be even less obvious. Dinosaurs for example, or us, or quasars.
Sometimes, you do have to run the code just to see what happens!
|
|
|
|