|
Seeing that some articles like this one[^] get some great reviews and consistent high scores, by a large number of CPians, could we see a "Code Project Seal Of Approval"
For example, an article that gets over an hundred votes and an average score of of 4.5, would get the seal of approval.
Max
Maximilien Lincourt
For success one must aquire one's self
|
|
|
|
|
|
(I just saw the popularity link...)
Max.
Maximilien Lincourt
For success one must aquire one's self
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote:
could we see a "Code Project Seal Of Approval"
Actually I suggested Chris that articles which won the monthly competitions should have "MFC / C++ : March Article of the Month" plaque image or something like that in recognition.
Don't ![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) and drive.
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea 
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|
|
|
How about some sort of reward for Message Voting? Seems little incentive to click 12345
Or is message voting on meant to be used in the extremes of good/bad?
Davy
Blog for Software Testing, Bugs, Quality, Security and Stability - www.latedecember.com
News From Angus, Scotland - The Angus Blog
My Personal Blog - Homepage.
|
|
|
|
|
voting seems to go like this:
5: the post was funny, well put, or you agree with the content.
4: it was pretty good, but not worth a 5. or, you know if you give it a 5, someone will come along and give it a 1, out of spite.
3: used only rarely: usually when you want to bring a post's rating back to normal levels, gently.
2: used when you can't find the "1"
1: the post was incoherent, a flame or troll, or you simply disagree with the content but lack the ability to put that disagreement into words. it can also be used when you don't like the person who posted. it's not uncommon to see 1's applied to every post made by a particular person, regardless of content.
(i am sure this was not the intent of implementing the voting system)
-c
(p.s. , yes, that's a rather cynical way of looking at it. )
Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
it can also be used when you don't like the person who posted. it's not uncommon to see 1's applied to every post made by a particular person, regardless of content
Hey, who authorized you to discuss my personal issues in public? Oops! You didnt mention me by name eh? Sorry 
Nish 
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
Review by Shog9
Click here for review[NW]
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant S wrote:
Hey, who authorized you to discuss my personal issues in public?
I think he is talking about himself, b'cos lot of his posts (90%) in soapbox get default 1 rating. 
Don't ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) and drive.
|
|
|
|
|
Kant wrote:
I think he is talking about himself, b'cos lot of his posts (90%) in soapbox get default 1 rating.
Chris L and I are the 1-brothers  We both have a very similar CP past where articles have been 1-downed by people and now posts too.
Nish
Author of the romantic comedy
Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win]
Review by Shog9
Click here for review[NW]
|
|
|
|
|
Could anyone please give the CP mail server its weekly kick to get the mails out?
Seems that on tuesday and wednesday there is no hope to get mail notifications.
Off to in ~62 days
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one using the Send to a friend feature?
However, I'll give it a try again: http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=457912&forumid=1645#xx457912xx[^]
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer:
Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw the post - it's on the TODO list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
 Ok then, thanks.
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer:
Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
I saw the post - it's on the TODO list.
You know, I use the same excuse here about not doing any work! 
Roger Allen
Sonork 100.10016
Were you different as a kid? Did you ever say "Ooohhh, shiny red" even once? - Paul Watson 11-February-2003
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Freudenberg wrote:
Am I the only one using the Send to a friend feature?
Probably. Who needs it anyway? If anyone is worth to be called a friend he/she knows and uses CP (and thus the article) anyway. So? 
Off to in ~60 days
|
|
|
|
|
Because I am a friend of myself Sometimes I am reading an interesting article while at home, which might be helpful at my job, therefore I often send links to myself 
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer:
Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Freudenberg wrote:
therefore I often send links to myself
Then maybe you should checkout the "My Bookmark" functionality? Works really nice.
Off to in ~60 days
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas Saurwein wrote:
Then maybe you should checkout the "My Bookmark" functionality? Works really nice.
I know that feature. However, it works nice only if you have less than 30 bookmarks set
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer:
Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Freudenberg wrote:
However, it works nice only if you have less than 30 bookmarks set
Doh, didnt know that. Well then, forget it and use that[^] instead, this solves your problem with bookmarks (and some others too).
Off to in ~60 days
|
|
|
|
|
a post with 1 or more "1" votes will be colored normally. the gray color doesn't appear until the rating goes above 1.0 but below 2.5 (? some magic number).
don't understand. feel dumb. need nap.
-c
Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler
|
|
|
|
|
Naw, it just takes 3 or more votes to show. They can be all 1s or just end up <2.5 (or whatever).
---
But, oh god / Under the weight of life / Things seem / Brighter on the other side
- David Matthews, Big Eyed Fish
|
|
|
|
|
From the FAQ:
The Noise level drop-down allows you to specify the minimum score a message must have in order for it to appear normally on the boards.
If a message has been given a score that is below your noise threshold then it will appear dimmed out on the boards. A message must have at least 5 votes and be below your threshold to be grayed out.
Messages that have been voted greater than 4.5 will be marked as red regardless of the the number of votes it has.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
A message must have at least 5 votes and be below your threshold to be grayed out.
looks like the limit is actually (as Shog points out) 3 votes, not 5.
and, what are the numeric levels of the thresholds?
-c
Image tools: ThumbNailer, Bobber, TIFFAssembler
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
