Bugs and Suggestions

13-Oct-13 22:51

Bug with the funny face with the tongue when i chose it from right menu it post it as question marks > Poke tongue | ;-P

Testing:

contracting199013-Oct-13 22:54

13-Oct-13 22:54

$Shucks | :-\$ Blush | :O

After testing 2 faces are now showing the one with the tongue and the one with poker face.

Marco Bertschi13-Oct-13 23:23

Marco Bertschi

13-Oct-13 23:23

Guess this one was already posted below.[^]

You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colon."

contracting199013-Oct-13 23:30

13-Oct-13 23:30

If it's not fixed yet we will keep reminding them to do it. You know how developers work D'Oh! | :doh:

Marco Bertschi13-Oct-13 23:33

Marco Bertschi

13-Oct-13 23:33

It was posted after midnight, last friday - Between last friday and today was something called weekend.
Whatsoever, Chris (Or a prolific member) replies to every bug report in here, so as long as you can't see an answer below the OP you can assume that Chris hadn't the time to check for new bugs yet.

Thanks787213-Oct-13 23:42

Thanks7872

13-Oct-13 23:42

contracting1990 wrote:
we will keep reminding them to do it

The site builders and Admin here at Code Project goes through almost each and every message posted here. They also change the status of the suggestion posted (Symbol against the title).

This is not something about to forget. No need to remind them. They will respond to your suggestion once reviewed.

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad

I think you know what they say about RegEx...

Matthew Dennis15-Oct-13 7:03

Matthew Dennis

15-Oct-13 7:03

Should be fixed after next deploy. I re-wrote the emoticon substitution code for performance reasons, but had a couple of problems with the RegEx.

Rajesh R Subramanian15-Oct-13 8:42

Rajesh R Subramanian

15-Oct-13 8:42

You have a problem, and you decide to solve it with RegEx. Now you have two problems. Smile | :)

"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

contracting199016-Oct-13 19:25

Author's picture not showing in Google search results

16-Oct-13 19:25

It is solved now.

Testing:

Poke tongue | ;-P

$Shucks | :-\$ Blush | :O

You can now update my subject icon.

Pablo Aliskevicius13-Oct-13 20:17

Pablo Aliskevicius

13-Oct-13 20:17

Lately, Codeproject results in Google searches no longer show star ratings and author info.

I searched for:
https://www.google.co.il/search?q=inurl%3Acodeproject.com+pointer[^]
Got five pages, no author pics, no ratings. A few weeks ago, they were showing.

A blog page I found (http://fnfweb.com/how-to-make-your-face-show-up-beside-google-search-results/[^]) says that the link should look like this:

HTML

<a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/114348963186279690859/?rel=author">+Kaitlin Reeves</a>

That is, the content begins with a plus sign, then the author's name.
In one of my articles, I found this:

HTML

<a href="https://plus.google.com/112066885820314203788?rel=author" rel="author" class="small-text">Google</a>

Maybe the '+' character in the content is the one that makes the difference?

Pablo.

"Accident: An inevitable occurrence due to the action of immutable natural laws." (Ambrose Bierce, circa 1899).

modified 15-Oct-13 2:37am.

Re: Author's picture not showing in Google search results

Chris Maunder1-Nov-13 17:21

Chris Maunder

1-Nov-13 17:21

The old (numbered) URL should still work.

The webmaster tools show that our tagging and microformat data is correct. google, in its wisdom, has just decided to ditch the eye candy.

It's incredibly frustrating

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

Votes Count Wrong

contracting199013-Oct-13 19:57

13-Oct-13 19:57

There is something wrong with the vote count in the weekly survey.

[Edit]
Ok I now see the legend "Respondents were allowed to choose more than one answer; totals may not add up to 100%"
[/Edit]

modified 14-Oct-13 5:09am.

SoMad13-Oct-13 21:57

SoMad

13-Oct-13 21:57

I don't see a problem, but since you currently have 666 points, all bets are off.
[Mumbling to myself...Where did I put all my crosses and the holy water?]

On a serious note, you do realize that you can check more than one checkbox in the survey, right?

Soren Madsen

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty

contracting199013-Oct-13 22:34

13-Oct-13 22:34

SoMad wrote:
I don't see a problem, but since you currently have 666 points, all bets are off.

[Mumbling to myself...Where did I put all my crosses and the holy water?]

Are you scared?

SoMad wrote:
you do realize that you can check more than one checkbox in the survey, right?

So the total votes represent the number of unique voters

SoMad13-Oct-13 22:42

SoMad

13-Oct-13 22:42

contracting1990 wrote:
So the total votes represent the number of unique voters

Yes, the Responses (currently 114) is the number of people that pushed the Vote button.

I see why you are asking the question - if you tally up the numbers in the Votes column, the result is not the number in bold on the last line.

Soren Madsen

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty

SoMad13-Oct-13 22:43

SoMad

13-Oct-13 22:43

contracting1990 wrote:
Are you scared?

Not anymore. 667 just does not have the same ring to it. Smile | :)

Soren Madsen

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty

contracting199013-Oct-13 22:47