|
Yeah - I thought about doing it that way but it wasn't fun to write! I'm sure I overcomplicated it, but - whatever - I had fun!
|
|
|
|
|
True -0 but the likelihood of the number system changing any time soon is low
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
1. Why not?
2. To learn the language. Beats the heck out of "Hello World".
3. For the same reason people draw doodles.
4. Why not?
|
|
|
|
|
That's it - it's a doodle!
|
|
|
|
|
Marc A. Brown wrote: 1. Why not?
Well he said he did it at work, so I assumed it was something required for the business rather than being done as a leisure activity. So re-inventing the wheel is not generally a good thing for a business to do with so trivial a thing.
Marc A. Brown wrote: To learn the language. Beats the heck out of "Hello World".
Again - he was doing it at work & I assumed that he wasn't doing it for fun but for a business requirement.
Marc A. Brown wrote: 4. Why not?
Because
MVVM # - I did it My Way
___________________________________________
Man, you're a god. - walterhevedeich 26/05/2011
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: he said he did it at work, so I assumed it was something required for the
business
I did most of my Turing Machine experiments at a previous job.
|
|
|
|
|
I love code reviews. Very brave. The hyenas are moving in.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
P.S.
Maybe look into using a StringBuilder
It's too early for a Friday Programming Quiz.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh oh, that's not how you do phone numbers.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Phone numbers aren't numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
How about to roman numerals
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, yeah - that's fun - actually quite difficult!
|
|
|
|
|
Only as difficult as you like.
|
|
|
|
|
I added that to my version last night.
And today I wondered about adding support for doing thousands as hundreds, e.g. "twenty-five hundred".
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for a few days' exercise. I made one that can be used like:
2345L.ToString<ShortScale>() ==> Two Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Five
Where ShortScale is:
public enum ShortScale : long
{
Zero = 0 , One = 1 , Two = 2 , Three = 3 , Four = 4 , Five = 5 , Six = 6 , Seven = 7 , Eight = 8
, Nine = 9 , Ten = 10 , Eleven = 11 , Twelve = 12 , Thirteen = 13 , Fourteen = 14 , Fifteen = 15
, Sixteen = 16 , Seventeen = 17 , Eighteen = 18 , Nineteen = 19
, [PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.HyphenatedAttribute] Twenty = 20
...
, [PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.CountedAttribute] Hundred = 100
...
}
I also have an enum that will yield Twenty-Three Hundred Forty-Five , but it needs work.
Here's another:
2345L.ToString<Roman>() ==> MMCCCXLV
public enum Roman
{
Nulla = 0
, [PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.RepeatedAttribute] I = 1
, [PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.RepeatedAttribute] IV = 4
, [PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.RepeatedAttribute] V = 5
, [PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.RepeatedAttribute] IX = 9
, [PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.RepeatedAttribute] X = 10
...
}
But this technique tops out at Quintillion (short scale) or Trillion (long scale), so another technique would be necessary to work with greater numbers.
It should be possible to define a class of BigInteger constants and use that instead.
Added:
public sealed class TestClass
{
public static readonly System.Numerics.BigInteger Zero = 0 ;
public static readonly System.Numerics.BigInteger One = 1 ;
...
[PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.HyphenatedAttribute]
public static readonly System.Numerics.BigInteger Twenty = 20 ;
...
[PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.CountedAttribute]
public static readonly System.Numerics.BigInteger Hundred = 100 ;
...
[PIEBALD.Types.NumNuts.CountedAttribute]
public static readonly System.Numerics.BigInteger Decillion = Thousand * Nonillion ;
...
}
modified 30-Sep-13 23:49pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That's really interesting... I completely didn't think about doing it like that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliant! That put a grin on my face this morning!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm thinking about starting an open project, and I've been looking for a site to write about it, to include code. I've noticed a lot of blogs don't deal well with code.
Would articles here be an acceptable way to share the project?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I've been a fan of the Japanese flavor of Magjong for a while. It's a some that neatly combines luck and strategy.
The project I'm thinking of is making an app that will be playing the game.
I'll be using .Net (C#) as my language of choice. The overhead of .Net shouldn't be an issue for performance.
I'll start with the core of the game with a simple command-line interface, staying with that until the game can be played. From there, I'll work on the user interface to make the playing the game enjoyable.
I'm not sure if I'll go with a networked game or not.
There's a lot of things to cover, so there will be plenty of articles.
|
|
|
|